Literature DB >> 31647956

Patient navigator reported patient barriers and delivered activities in two large federally-funded cancer screening programs.

Wendy E Barrington1, Amy DeGroff2, Stephanie Melillo2, Thuy Vu3, Allison Cole3, Cam Escoffery4, Natoshia Askelson5, Laura Seegmiller5, Sarah Koopman Gonzalez6, Peggy Hannon3.   

Abstract

Few data are available on patient navigators (PNs) across diverse roles and organizational settings that could inform optimization of patient navigation models for cancer prevention. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) and the Colorectal Cancer and Control Program (CRCCP) are two federally-funded screening programs that support clinical- and community-based PNs who serve low-income and un- or underinsured populations across the United States. An online survey assessing PN characteristics, delivered activities, and patient barriers to screening was completed by 437 of 1002 identified PNs (44%). Responding PNs were racially and ethnically diverse, had varied professional backgrounds and practice-settings, worked with diverse populations, and were located within rural and urban/suburban locations across the U.S. More PNs reported working to promote screening for breast/cervical cancers (BCC, 94%) compared to colorectal cancer (CRC, 39%). BCC and CRC PNs reported similar frequencies of individual- (e.g., knowledge, motivation, fear) and community-level patient barriers (e.g., beliefs about healthcare and screening). Despite reporting significant patient structural barriers (e.g., transportation, work and clinic hours), most BCC and CRC PNs delivered individual-level navigation activities (e.g., education, appointment reminders). PN training to identify and champion timely and patient-centered adjustments to organizational policies, practices, and norms of the NBCCEDP, CRCCP, and partner organizations may be beneficial. More research is needed to determine whether multilevel interventions that support this approach could reduce structural barriers and increase screening and diagnostic follow-up among the marginalized communities served by these two important cancer-screening programs.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Cancer; Cervical; Colorectal; Navigation; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31647956      PMCID: PMC7055651          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  23 in total

1.  Impact of patient and navigator race and language concordance on care after cancer screening abnormalities.

Authors:  Marjory Charlot; M Christina Santana; Clara A Chen; Sharon Bak; Timothy C Heeren; Tracy A Battaglia; A Patrick Egan; Richard Kalish; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The origin, evolution, and principles of patient navigation.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brittany M Bernardo; Xiaochen Zhang; Chloe M Beverly Hery; Rachel J Meadows; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Briana Lawrence; Randy Elder; Shawna L Mercer; Katherine M Wilson; Barbara DeVinney; Stephanie Melillo; Michelle Carvalho; Stephen Taplin; Roshan Bastani; Barbara K Rimer; Sally W Vernon; Cathy Lee Melvin; Vicky Taylor; Maria Fernandez; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: 25 Years of public health service to low-income women.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Jewel Mullen
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  What are patient navigators doing, for whom, and where? A national survey evaluating the types of services provided by patient navigators.

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Patricia Valverde; Amy E Ustjanauskas; Elizabeth A Calhoun; Betsy C Risendal
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-08-31

7.  Evaluating the efficacy of lay health advisors for increasing risk-appropriate Pap test screening: a randomized controlled trial among Ohio Appalachian women.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; John M McLaughlin; Amy M Lehman; Mira L Katz; Cathy M Tatum; Jill M Oliveri
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Arica White; Trevor D Thompson; Mary C White; Susan A Sabatino; Janet de Moor; Paul V Doria-Rose; Ann M Geiger; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, Featuring Cancer in Men and Women Age 20-49 Years.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Recinda L Sherman; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; David A Siegel; Eric J Feuer; Albert U Firth; Betsy A Kohler; Susan Scott; Jiemin Ma; Robert N Anderson; Vicki Benard; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Use of Community Health Workers and Patient Navigators to Improve Cancer Outcomes Among Patients Served by Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Katherine B Roland; Erin L Milliken; Elizabeth A Rohan; Amy DeGroff; Susan White; Stephanie Melillo; William E Rorie; Carmita-Anita C Signes; Paul A Young
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2017-05-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  The Effect of Peer-Led Navigation Approach as a Form of Task Shifting in Promoting Cervical Cancer Screening Knowledge, Intention, and Practices Among Urban Women in Tanzania: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joanes Faustine Mboineki; Panpan Wang; Kamala Dhakal; Mikiyas Amare Getu; Changying Chen
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

2.  Evaluating Uptake of Evidence-Based Interventions in 355 Clinics Partnering With the Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2015-2018.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Amy DeGroff; Sarah D Hohl; Krishna P Sharma; Juzhong Sun; Cam Escoffery; Peggy A Hannon
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.354

3.  Evaluation of Patient-Reported Delays and Affordability-Related Barriers to Care in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas R Lenze; Jeannette T Bensen; Laura Farnan; Siddharth Sheth; Jose P Zevallos; Wendell G Yarbrough; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2021-12-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.