Literature DB >> 25912664

Mechanical analysis of the human cadaveric thoracic spine with intact rib cage.

Erin M Mannen1, John T Anderson2, Paul M Arnold3, Elizabeth A Friis4.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to characterize the overall in-plane and basic coupled motion of a cadaveric human thoracic spine with intact true ribs. Researchers are becoming increasingly interested in the thoracic spine due to both the high prevalence of injury and pain in the region and also innovative surgical techniques that utilize the rib cage. Computational models can be useful tools to predict loading patterns and understand effects of surgical procedures or medical devices, but they are often limited by insufficient cadaveric input data. In this study, pure moments to ±5 Nm were applied in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation to seven human cadaveric thoracic spine specimens (T1-T12) with intact true ribs to determine symmetry of in-plane motion, differences in neutral and elastic zone motion and stiffness, and significance of out-of-plane rotations and translations. Results showed that lateral bending and axial rotation exhibited symmetric motion, neutral and elastic zone motion and stiffness values were significantly different for all modes of bending (p<0.05), and out-of-plane rotations and translations were greater than zero for most rotations and translations. Overall in-plane rotations were 7.7±3.4° in flexion, 9.6±3.7° in extension, 23.3±8.4° in lateral bending, and 26.3±12.2° in axial rotation. Results of this study could provide inputs or validation comparisons for computational models. Future studies should characterize coupled motion patterns and local and regional level biomechanics of cadaveric human thoracic spines with intact true ribs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Human cadaver; Range of motion; Rib cage; Thoracic spine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25912664     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  The rib cage stiffens the thoracic spine in a cadaveric model with body weight load under dynamic moments.

Authors:  Erin M Mannen; Elizabeth A Friis; Hadley L Sis; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-05-16

2.  IMPAIRMENT BASED EXAMINATION AND TREATMENT OF COSTOCHONDRITIS: A CASE SERIES.

Authors:  Richard A Zaruba; Eric Wilson
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-06

3.  Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.

Authors:  Sriram Balasubramanian; James R Peters; Lucy F Robinson; Anita Singh; Richard W Kent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical Evaluation of a Growth-Friendly Rod Construct.

Authors:  Sarah Galvis; Josh Arnold; Erin Mannen; Benjamin Wong; Hadley Sis; Eileen Cadel; John Anderson; Dennis Anderson; Paul Arnold; Elizabeth Friis
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2017-01

5.  How Does the Rib Cage Affect the Biomechanical Properties of the Thoracic Spine? A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Christian Liebsch; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-15

6.  Effect of follower load on motion and stiffness of the human thoracic spine with intact rib cage.

Authors:  Hadley L Sis; Erin M Mannen; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Effects of follower load and rib cage on intervertebral disc pressure and sagittal plane curvature in static tests of cadaveric thoracic spines.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; Erin M Mannen; Hadley L Sis; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Elizabeth A Friis; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The rib cage reduces intervertebral disc pressures in cadaveric thoracic spines by sharing loading under applied dynamic moments.

Authors:  Dennis E Anderson; Erin M Mannen; Rebecca Tromp; Benjamin M Wong; Hadley L Sis; Eileen S Cadel; Elizabeth A Friis; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  A Novel Spinal Implant for Fusionless Scoliosis Correction: A Biomechanical Analysis of the Motion Preserving Properties of a Posterior Periapical Concave Distraction Device.

Authors:  Roderick M Holewijn; Marinus de Kleuver; Albert J van der Veen; Kaj S Emanuel; Arno Bisschop; Agnita Stadhouder; Barend J van Royen; Idsart Kingma
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07

10.  Planning the Surgical Correction of Spinal Deformities: Toward the Identification of the Biomechanical Principles by Means of Numerical Simulation.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Tito Bassani; Luigi La Barbera; Claudia Ottardi; Benedikt Schlager; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Tomaso Villa; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-11-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.