Literature DB >> 29102819

Robust and transferable quantification of NMR spectral quality using IROC analysis.

Matthew A Zambrello1, Mark W Maciejewski1, Adam D Schuyler1, Gerard Weatherby1, Jeffrey C Hoch2.   

Abstract

Non-Fourier methods are increasingly utilized in NMR spectroscopy because of their ability to handle nonuniformly-sampled data. However, non-Fourier methods present unique challenges due to their nonlinearity, which can produce nonrandom noise and render conventional metrics for spectral quality such as signal-to-noise ratio unreliable. The lack of robust and transferable metrics (i.e. applicable to methods exhibiting different nonlinearities) has hampered comparison of non-Fourier methods and nonuniform sampling schemes, preventing the identification of best practices. We describe a novel method, in situ receiver operating characteristic analysis (IROC), for characterizing spectral quality based on the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve. IROC utilizes synthetic signals added to empirical data as "ground truth", and provides several robust scalar-valued metrics for spectral quality. This approach avoids problems posed by nonlinear spectral estimates, and provides a versatile quantitative means of characterizing many aspects of spectral quality. We demonstrate applications to parameter optimization in Fourier and non-Fourier spectral estimation, critical comparison of different methods for spectrum analysis, and optimization of nonuniform sampling schemes. The approach will accelerate the discovery of optimal approaches to nonuniform sampling experiment design and non-Fourier spectrum analysis for multidimensional NMR.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sensitivity metric; Spectral quality; Spectrum analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29102819      PMCID: PMC5731825          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  33 in total

Review 1.  Maximum entropy reconstruction, spectrum analysis and deconvolution in multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  J C Hoch; A S Stern
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Protein structure validation by generalized linear model root-mean-square deviation prediction.

Authors:  Anurag Bagaria; Victor Jaravine; Yuanpeng J Huang; Gaetano T Montelione; Peter Güntert
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  A Unique Tool for Cellular Structural Biology: In-cell NMR.

Authors:  Enrico Luchinat; Lucia Banci
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Abhaya Indrayan
Journal:  Indian Pediatr       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.411

5.  Deletion mutants of the herpes simplex virus type 1 UL8 protein: effect on DNA synthesis and ability to interact with and influence the intracellular localization of the UL5 and UL52 proteins.

Authors:  E C Barnard; G Brown; N D Stow
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1997-10-13       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  Quantification of maximum-entropy spectrum reconstructions.

Authors:  P Schmieder; A S Stern; G Wagner; J C Hoch
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  NMRbox: A Resource for Biomolecular NMR Computation.

Authors:  Mark W Maciejewski; Adam D Schuyler; Michael R Gryk; Ion I Moraru; Pedro R Romero; Eldon L Ulrich; Hamid R Eghbalnia; Miron Livny; Frank Delaglio; Jeffrey C Hoch
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Applications of NMR spectroscopy to systems biochemistry.

Authors:  Teresa W-M Fan; Andrew N Lane
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 9.795

9.  Exploring signal-to-noise ratio and sensitivity in non-uniformly sampled multi-dimensional NMR spectra.

Authors:  Sven G Hyberts; Scott A Robson; Gerhard Wagner
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Perspective: revisiting the field dependence of TROSY sensitivity.

Authors:  Koh Takeuchi; Haribabu Arthanari; Gerhard Wagner
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 2.835

View more
  4 in total

1.  Nonuniform sampling in multidimensional NMR for improving spectral sensitivity.

Authors:  Matthew A Zambrello; Adam D Schuyler; Mark W Maciejewski; Frank Delaglio; Irina Bezsonova; Jeffrey C Hoch
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  The influence of the probability density function on spectral quality in nonuniformly sampled multidimensional NMR.

Authors:  Matthew A Zambrello; D Levi Craft; Jeffrey C Hoch; David Rovnyak; Adam D Schuyler
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Fundamental and practical aspects of machine learning for the peak picking of biomolecular NMR spectra.

Authors:  Da-Wei Li; Alexandar L Hansen; Lei Bruschweiler-Li; Chunhua Yuan; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Improving the sensitivity of FT-NMR spectroscopy by apodization weighted sampling.

Authors:  Bernd Simon; Herbert Köstler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.835

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.