Literature DB >> 22113924

Protein structure validation by generalized linear model root-mean-square deviation prediction.

Anurag Bagaria1, Victor Jaravine, Yuanpeng J Huang, Gaetano T Montelione, Peter Güntert.   

Abstract

Large-scale initiatives for obtaining spatial protein structures by experimental or computational means have accentuated the need for the critical assessment of protein structure determination and prediction methods. These include blind test projects such as the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP) and the critical assessment of protein structure determination by nuclear magnetic resonance (CASD-NMR). An important aim is to establish structure validation criteria that can reliably assess the accuracy of a new protein structure. Various quality measures derived from the coordinates have been proposed. A universal structural quality assessment method should combine multiple individual scores in a meaningful way, which is challenging because of their different measurement units. Here, we present a method based on a generalized linear model (GLM) that combines diverse protein structure quality scores into a single quantity with intuitive meaning, namely the predicted coordinate root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) value between the present structure and the (unavailable) "true" structure (GLM-RMSD). For two sets of structural models from the CASD-NMR and CASP projects, this GLM-RMSD value was compared with the actual accuracy given by the RMSD value to the corresponding, experimentally determined reference structure from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The correlation coefficients between actual (model vs. reference from PDB) and predicted (model vs. "true") heavy-atom RMSDs were 0.69 and 0.76, for the two datasets from CASD-NMR and CASP, respectively, which is considerably higher than those for the individual scores (-0.24 to 0.68). The GLM-RMSD can thus predict the accuracy of protein structures more reliably than individual coordinate-based quality scores.
Copyright © 2011 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22113924      PMCID: PMC3324767          DOI: 10.1002/pro.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  32 in total

1.  Protein structural alignments and functional genomics.

Authors:  J A Irving; J C Whisstock; A M Lesk
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-02-15

2.  Modeling of loops in protein structures.

Authors:  A Fiser; R K Do; A Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation.

Authors:  Simon C Lovell; Ian W Davis; W Bryan Arendall; Paul I W de Bakker; J Michael Word; Michael G Prisant; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-02-15

4.  Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles.

Authors:  R Lüthy; J U Bowie; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Prediction of homology model quality with multivariate regression.

Authors:  Kristin Tøndel
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

6.  WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program.

Authors:  G Vriend
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1990-03

7.  Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins.

Authors:  M J Sippl
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1993-12

8.  Microscopic stability of cold shock protein A examined by NMR native state hydrogen exchange as a function of urea and trimethylamine N-oxide.

Authors:  V A Jaravine; K Rathgeb-Szabo; A T Alexandrescu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  The solution structure of eglin c based on measurements of many NOEs and coupling constants and its comparison with X-ray structures.

Authors:  S G Hyberts; M S Goldberg; T F Havel; G Wagner
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Objective identification of residue ranges for the superposition of protein structures.

Authors:  Donata K Kirchner; Peter Güntert
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  20 in total

1.  Structural determinants of the interaction between the TpsA and TpsB proteins in the Haemophilus influenzae HMW1 two-partner secretion system.

Authors:  Susan Grass; Katherine A Rempe; Joseph W St Geme
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Profiling of rotavirus 3'UTR-binding proteins reveals the ATP synthase subunit ATP5B as a host factor that supports late-stage virus replication.

Authors:  Lili Ren; Siyuan Ding; Yanhua Song; Bin Li; Muthukumar Ramanathan; Julia Co; Manuel R Amieva; Paul A Khavari; Harry B Greenberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Recommendations of the wwPDB NMR Validation Task Force.

Authors:  Gaetano T Montelione; Michael Nilges; Ad Bax; Peter Güntert; Torsten Herrmann; Jane S Richardson; Charles D Schwieters; Wim F Vranken; Geerten W Vuister; David S Wishart; Helen M Berman; Gerard J Kleywegt; John L Markley
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  De novo design of a hyperstable non-natural protein-ligand complex with sub-Å accuracy.

Authors:  Nicholas F Polizzi; Yibing Wu; Thomas Lemmin; Alison M Maxwell; Shao-Qing Zhang; Jeff Rawson; David N Beratan; Michael J Therien; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 24.427

5.  Modeling of babesipain-1 and identification of natural and synthetic leads for bovine babesiosis drug development.

Authors:  Potshangbam Angamba Meetei; R S Rathore; N Prakash Prabhu; Vaibhav Vindal
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 6.  Quality assessment of protein NMR structures.

Authors:  Antonio Rosato; Roberto Tejero; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Robust and transferable quantification of NMR spectral quality using IROC analysis.

Authors:  Matthew A Zambrello; Mark W Maciejewski; Adam D Schuyler; Gerard Weatherby; Jeffrey C Hoch
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 8.  An overview of tools for the validation of protein NMR structures.

Authors:  Geerten W Vuister; Rasmus H Fogh; Pieter M S Hendrickx; Jurgen F Doreleijers; Aleksandras Gutmanas
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  CING: an integrated residue-based structure validation program suite.

Authors:  Jurgen F Doreleijers; Alan W Sousa da Silva; Elmar Krieger; Sander B Nabuurs; Christian A E M Spronk; Tim J Stevens; Wim F Vranken; Gert Vriend; Geerten W Vuister
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Highly efficient NMR assignment of intrinsically disordered proteins: application to B- and T cell receptor domains.

Authors:  Linnéa Isaksson; Maxim Mayzel; Maria Saline; Anders Pedersen; Joakim Rosenlöw; Bernhard Brutscher; B Göran Karlsson; Vladislav Y Orekhov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.