T D Rozental1, F Johannesdottir2, K C Kempland3, M L Bouxsein2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, 330 Brookline Avenue - Stoneman 10, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. trozenta@bidmc.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, RN 119, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, 330 Brookline Avenue - Stoneman 10, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Abstract
Individual trabecular segmentation was utilized to identify differences in trabecular bone structure in premenopausal women with wrist fractures and non-fracture controls. Fracture subjects had reduced trabecular plate volume, number, thickness, and connectivity. Identifying altered trabecular microarchitecture in young women offers opportunities for counseling and lifestyle modifications to reduce fracture risk. INTRODUCTION: Premenopausal women with distal radius fractures (DRF) have worse trabecular bone microarchitecture than non-fracture controls (CONT), yet the characteristics of their trabecular bone structure are unknown. METHODS: Premenopausal women with DRF (n = 40) and CONT (n = 80) were recruited. Primary outcome variables included trabecular structure at the distal radius and tibia, assessed by volumetric decomposition of individual trabecular plates and rods from high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT images. Trabecular morphology included plate and rod number, volume, thickness, and connectivity. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the femoral neck (FN aBMD), and ultradistal radius (UDR aBMD) were measured by DXA. RESULTS: Trabecular morphology differed between DRF and CONT at the radius and tibia (OR per SD decline 1.58-2.7). At the radius, associations remained significant when adjusting for age and FN aBMD (ORs = 1.76-3.26) and age and UDR aBMD (ORs = 1.72-3.97). Plate volume fraction, number and axially aligned trabeculae remained associated with DRF after adjustment for trabecular density (ORs = 2.55-2.85). Area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating DRF was 0.74 for the proportion of axially aligned trabeculae, compared with 0.60 for FN aBMD, 0.65 for UDR aBMD, and 0.69 for trabecular density. Plate number, plate-plate junction, and axial bone volume fraction remained associated with DRF at the tibia (ORs = 2.14-2.77) after adjusting for age, FN aBMD, or UDR aBMD. AUCP.P.Junc.D was 0.72 versus 0.61 for FNaBMD, 0.66 for UDRaBMD, and 0.70 for trabecular density. CONCLUSION: Premenopausal women with DRF have lower trabecular plate volume, number, thickness, and connectivity than CONT. Identification of young women with altered microarchitecture offers opportunities for lifestyle modifications to reduce fracture risk.
Individual trabecular segmentation was utilized to identify differences in trabecular bone structure in premenopausal women with wrist fractures and non-fracture controls. Fracture subjects had reduced trabecular plate volume, number, thickness, and connectivity. Identifying altered trabecular microarchitecture in young women offers opportunities for counseling and lifestyle modifications to reduce fracture risk. INTRODUCTION: Premenopausal women with distal radius fractures (DRF) have worse trabecular bone microarchitecture than non-fracture controls (CONT), yet the characteristics of their trabecular bone structure are unknown. METHODS: Premenopausal women with DRF (n = 40) and CONT (n = 80) were recruited. Primary outcome variables included trabecular structure at the distal radius and tibia, assessed by volumetric decomposition of individual trabecular plates and rods from high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT images. Trabecular morphology included plate and rod number, volume, thickness, and connectivity. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the femoral neck (FN aBMD), and ultradistal radius (UDR aBMD) were measured by DXA. RESULTS: Trabecular morphology differed between DRF and CONT at the radius and tibia (OR per SD decline 1.58-2.7). At the radius, associations remained significant when adjusting for age and FN aBMD (ORs = 1.76-3.26) and age and UDR aBMD (ORs = 1.72-3.97). Plate volume fraction, number and axially aligned trabeculae remained associated with DRF after adjustment for trabecular density (ORs = 2.55-2.85). Area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating DRF was 0.74 for the proportion of axially aligned trabeculae, compared with 0.60 for FN aBMD, 0.65 for UDR aBMD, and 0.69 for trabecular density. Plate number, plate-plate junction, and axial bone volume fraction remained associated with DRF at the tibia (ORs = 2.14-2.77) after adjusting for age, FN aBMD, or UDR aBMD. AUCP.P.Junc.D was 0.72 versus 0.61 for FNaBMD, 0.66 for UDRaBMD, and 0.70 for trabecular density. CONCLUSION: Premenopausal women with DRF have lower trabecular plate volume, number, thickness, and connectivity than CONT. Identification of young women with altered microarchitecture offers opportunities for lifestyle modifications to reduce fracture risk.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone mineral density (BMD); Distal radius fracture (DRF); High-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT); Individual trabecular segmentation (ITS); Osteoporosis
Authors: Kristin L Popp; Julie M Hughes; Adriana Martinez-Betancourt; Matthew Scott; Victoria Turkington; Signe Caksa; Katelyn I Guerriere; Kathryn E Ackerman; Chun Xu; Ginu Unnikrishnan; Jaques Reifman; Mary L Bouxsein Journal: Bone Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Stacey A Wainwright; Lynn M Marshall; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Dennis M Black; Teresa A Hillier; Marc C Hochberg; Molly T Vogt; Eric S Orwoll Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-02-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Nicolas Vilayphiou; Stephanie Boutroy; Pawel Szulc; Bert van Rietbergen; Francoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas; Roland Chapurlat Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Yohann Bala; Quang Minh Bui; Xiao-Fang Wang; Sandra Iuliano; Qingju Wang; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; Tamara D Rozental; Mary L Bouxsein; Roger M D Zebaze; Ego Seeman Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Jill M Slade; C Scott Bickel; Christopher M Modlesky; Sharmila Majumdar; Gary A Dudley Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2004-08-28 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Stephanie Boutroy; Sundeep Khosla; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Maria Belen Zanchetta; Donald J McMahon; Chiyuan A Zhang; Roland D Chapurlat; Jose Zanchetta; Emily M Stein; Cesar Bogado; Sharmila Majumdar; Andrew J Burghardt; Elizabeth Shane Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Emily M Stein; X Sherry Liu; Thomas L Nickolas; Adi Cohen; Valerie Thomas; Donald J McMahon; Chiyuan Zhang; Perry T Yin; Felicia Cosman; Jeri Nieves; X Edward Guo; Elizabeth Shane Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 6.741