Literature DB >> 29098355

Superior glenoid inclination and glenoid bone loss : Definition, assessment, biomechanical consequences, and surgical options.

L Favard1, J Berhouet2, G Walch3, J Chaoui4, C Lévigne5.   

Abstract

Correct anatomical alignment of the glenoid component is of central importance for wear and loosening in shoulder endoprostheses. The aim of this article is to review and clarify the biomechanical and clinical effects of incorrect glenoid inclination in reverse and anatomical joint replacements. Based on the literature and on our own work, statements are made about the following: (1) the glenoid inclination of a normal glenoid, a degenerative glenoid and a glenoid implant, and the consequences if superior inclination is too large, and (2) the surgical technique as well as tips and tricks for correct adjustment of the inclination. The inclination of the glenoid plane is a morphological parameter of the scapula with high individual variation and is best measured using reformatted computed tomography using three-dimensional software for reconstruction and evaluation. The standard value is between 0 and 10°. Excessive superior inclination promotes translation of the humeral head and the formation of rotator cuff tears-in a degenerative glenoid, to superior wear. The correct amount of superior inclination of the glenoid component is essential for the survival of the implant. Positioning without excessive superior inclination is therefore mandatory. Precise preoperative determination of glenoid inclination and wear is important in order to correctly plan the positioning of an implant. This serves as the basis for deciding whether a bone graft or patient-specific instrumentation is necessary. Thus, the surgeon also has prognostic parameters for the anticipation of possible complications as a result of the bone defect and abnormal orientation. However, the evaluation must always include the position of the scapula in these considerations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone transplantation; Humeral head; Imaging, three-dimensional; Rotator cuff; Shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29098355     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-017-3496-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  30 in total

1.  Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder.

Authors:  Alexander Maurer; Sandro F Fucentese; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Stephan H Wirth; Ali Djahangiri; Bernhard Jost; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Three-dimensional glenoid deformity in patients with osteoarthritis: a radiographic analysis.

Authors:  P Habermeyer; P Magosch; V Luz; S Lichtenberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Age-dependent variation of glenohumeral anatomy: a radiological study.

Authors:  Benjamin Bockmann; Sonja Soschynski; Philipp Lechler; Steffen Ruchholtz; Florian Debus; Tim Schwarting; Michael Frink
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Matthew Walker; Matthew Willis; Derek R Pupello; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Birgit S Werner; Robert Hudek; Klaus J Burkhart; Frank Gohlke
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Dane Salazar; Aaron Chamberlain; Jay D Keener
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is it important to avoid it and how?

Authors:  Christophe Lévigne; Jérome Garret; Pascal Boileau; Ghassan Alami; Luc Favard; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study.

Authors:  R S Churchill; J J Brems; H Kotschi
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G Walch; R Badet; A Boulahia; A Khoury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Prosthetic overhang is the most effective way to prevent scapular conflict in a reverse total shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Lieven F de Wilde; Didier Poncet; Bart Middernacht; Anders Ekelund
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Glenoid bony morphology of osteoarthritis prior to shoulder arthroplasty: what the surgeon wants to know and why.

Authors:  Lawrence Lo; Scott Koenig; Natalie L Leong; Brian B Shiu; S Ashfaq Hasan; Mohit N Gilotra; Kenneth C Wang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Tomographic Analysis of Positioning of Reverse Baseplates Positioning.

Authors:  Alexandre Almeida; Daniel C Agostini; Pietro Ft Nesello; Nayvaldo C de Almeida; Rafael Mioso; Ana Paula Agostini
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2021-02-15

3.  The implications of the glenoid angles and rotator cuff status in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Omer Ozel; Robert Hudek; Mohamed S Abdrabou; Birgit S Werner; Frank Gohlke
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  The Evolution of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty-From the First Steps to Novel Implant Designs and Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Julia K Frank; Paul Siegert; Fabian Plachel; Philipp R Heuberer; Stephanie Huber; Jakob E Schanda
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.