Brian Grieve1, Gabriel D Shapiro2, Lucy Wibbenmeyer1, Amy Acton3, Austin Lee4, Molly Marino5, Alan Jette5, Jeffrey C Schneider6, Lewis E Kazis5, Colleen M Ryan7. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Phoenix Society for Burn Survivors, Grand Rapids, MI. 4. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 5. Department of Health, Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 6. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 7. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Shriners Hospitals for Children-Boston, Boston, MA. Electronic address: cryan@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in long-term social reintegration outcomes for burn survivors with and without peer support attendance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Community-dwelling burn survivors. PARTICIPANTS: Burn survivors (N=601) aged ≥18 years with injuries to ≥5% total body surface area (TBSA) or burns to critical areas (hands, feet, face, or genitals). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation Profile was used to examine the following previously validated 6 scale scores of social participation: Family and Friends, Social Interactions, Social Activities, Work and Employment, Romantic Relationships, and Sexual Relationships. RESULTS: Burn support group attendance was reported by 330 (55%) of 596 respondents who responded to this item. Attendees had larger burn size (43.4%±23.6% vs 36.8%±23.4% TBSA burned, P<.01) and were more likely to be >10 years from injury (50% vs 42.5%, P<.01). Survivors who attended at least 1 support group scored significantly higher on 3 of the scales: Social Interactions (P=.01), Social Activities (P=.04), and Work and Employment (P=.05). In adjusted analyses, peer support attendance was associated with increased scores on the Social Interactions scale, increasing scores by 17% of an SD (95% confidence interval, 1%-33%; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Burn survivors who reported peer support attendance had better social interaction scores than those who did not. This is the first reported association between peer support group attendance and improvements in community reintegration in burn survivors. This cross-sectional study prompts further exploration into the potential benefits of peer support groups on burn recovery with future intervention studies.
OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in long-term social reintegration outcomes for burn survivors with and without peer support attendance. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Community-dwelling burn survivors. PARTICIPANTS: Burn survivors (N=601) aged ≥18 years with injuries to ≥5% total body surface area (TBSA) or burns to critical areas (hands, feet, face, or genitals). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation Profile was used to examine the following previously validated 6 scale scores of social participation: Family and Friends, Social Interactions, Social Activities, Work and Employment, Romantic Relationships, and Sexual Relationships. RESULTS: Burn support group attendance was reported by 330 (55%) of 596 respondents who responded to this item. Attendees had larger burn size (43.4%±23.6% vs 36.8%±23.4% TBSA burned, P<.01) and were more likely to be >10 years from injury (50% vs 42.5%, P<.01). Survivors who attended at least 1 support group scored significantly higher on 3 of the scales: Social Interactions (P=.01), Social Activities (P=.04), and Work and Employment (P=.05). In adjusted analyses, peer support attendance was associated with increased scores on the Social Interactions scale, increasing scores by 17% of an SD (95% confidence interval, 1%-33%; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Burn survivors who reported peer support attendance had better social interaction scores than those who did not. This is the first reported association between peer support group attendance and improvements in community reintegration in burn survivors. This cross-sectional study prompts further exploration into the potential benefits of peer support groups on burn recovery with future intervention studies.
Authors: Renan C Castillo; Stephen T Wegener; Mary Zadnik Newell; Anthony R Carlini; Anna N Bradford; Sara E Heins; Elizabeth Wysocki; Andrew N Pollak; Harry Teter; Ellen J Mackenzie Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Benjamin Levi; Casey T Kraft; Gabriel D Shapiro; Nhi-Ha T Trinh; Emily C Dore; James Jeng; Austin F Lee; Amy Acton; Molly Marino; Alan Jette; Elizabeth A Armstrong; Jeffrey C Schneider; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Erin E Ross; Rachel A Colbath; Jeremy Yu; Naikhoba Munabi; T Justin Gillenwater; Haig A Yenikomshian Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 1.819
Authors: Randy D Kearns; Amanda P Bettencourt; William L Hickerson; Tina L Palmieri; Paul D Biddinger; Colleen M Ryan; James C Jeng Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Emily A Ohrtman; Gabriel D Shapiro; Audrey E Wolfe; Nhi-Ha T Trinh; Pengsheng Ni; Amy Acton; Mary D Slavin; Colleen M Ryan; Lewis E Kazis; Jeffrey C Schneider Journal: Burns Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Mary D Slavin; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Amy Acton; Flor Amaya; Cayla Saret; Emily Ohrtman; Audrey Wolfe; Pengsheng Ni; Lewis E Kazis Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Benjamin B Wang; Khushbu F Patel; Audrey E Wolfe; Shelley Wiechman; Kara McMullen; Nicole S Gibran; Karen Kowalske; Walter J Meyer; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider Journal: Burns Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Colleen M Ryan; Gabriel D Shapiro; Camerin A Rencken; Cornelia Griggs; James C Jeng; William L Hickerson; Molly Marino; Jeremy Goverman; Lewis E Kazis; Jeffrey C Schneider Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Lynne Benavides; Vivian Shie; Brennan Yee; Miranda Yelvington; Laura C Simko; Audrey E Wolfe; Kara McMullen; Janelle Epp; Ingrid Parry; Rachel Shon; Radha Holavanahalli; David Herndon; Marta Rosenberg; Laura Rosenberg; Walter Meyer; Nicole Gibran; Shelley Wiechman; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 1.819
Authors: Emily A Ohrtman; Gabriel D Shapiro; Laura C Simko; Emily Dore; Mary D Slavin; Cayla Saret; Flor Amaya; J Lomelin-Gascon; Pengsheng Ni; Amy Acton; Molly Marino; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 1.819