Literature DB >> 32556266

Interpreting Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation Profile Scores for Use by Clinicians, Burn Survivors, and Researchers.

Mary D Slavin1, Colleen M Ryan2, Jeffrey C Schneider3,4,5, Amy Acton6, Flor Amaya1, Cayla Saret1, Emily Ohrtman3, Audrey Wolfe3, Pengsheng Ni1, Lewis E Kazis1.   

Abstract

The Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile is a patient-reported outcome measure developed to assess social participation in adult burn survivors. This study identified numeric score cut-points that define different levels of social participation ability and described each level. An expert panel identified numeric score cut-points that distinguish different levels of social participation for the six LIBRE Profile domains. Methods employed an iterative, modified-Delphi approach, and bookmarking to review calibrated item banks. Analyses (using calibration sample data and repeated in a validation sample) examined means, SDs, and sample distributions for each level. Analyses of variance examined score differences between levels. The panel developed descriptions for each established level. Initial cut-points resulted in four levels for five domains (Social Activities, Social Interactions, Romantic Relationships, Sexual Relationships, and Work & Employment) and five levels for the sixth domain (Relationships with Family & Friends). Comparisons demonstrated significant differences between level mean scores for all domains (P < .05) except Relationships with Family & Friends. Based on follow-up surveys, Relationships with Family & Friends score cut-points were adjusted to identify four levels with significant score differences between all levels. Panelists reached consensus for level descriptions. Score cut-points and descriptions identify different levels of social participation, providing a relevant context for interpreting LIBRE Profile numeric scores. LIBRE Profile Social Participation levels will help clinicians and persons with burn injury interpret LIBRE Profile numeric scores and promote use of this important new assessment.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32556266      PMCID: PMC8265741          DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  32 in total

1.  Psychosocial adjustments 5 years after burn injury.

Authors:  N Pallua; H W Künsebeck; E M Noah
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Interpreting physical and behavioral health scores from new work disability instruments.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Marfeo; Pengsheng Ni; Leighton Chan; Elizabeth K Rasch; Christine M McDonough; Diane E Brandt; Kara Bogusz; Alan M Jette
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Interpreting rehabilitation outcome measurements.

Authors:  Alan M Jette; Wei Tao; Anna Norweg; Stephen Haley
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 4.  The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Nan E Rothrock; Esi M DeWitt; Brennan Spiegel; Carole A Tucker; Heidi M Crane; Christopher B Forrest; Donald L Patrick; Rob Fredericksen; Lisa M Shulman; David Cella; Paul K Crane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Measuring the Social Impact of Burns on Survivors.

Authors:  Molly Marino; Marina Soley-Bori; Alan M Jette; Mary D Slavin; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Amy Acton; Flor Amaya; Melinda Rossi; Rene Soria-Saucedo; Linda Resnik; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

6.  Psychological and social problems in burn patients after discharge. A follow-up study.

Authors:  A W Faber; H J Klasen; E W Sauër; F M Vuister
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  1987

7.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008.

Authors:  David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Functional ability level development and validation: providing clinical meaning for Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index scores.

Authors:  Richa Sinha; Mary D Slavin; Pamela A Kisala; Pengsheng Ni; David S Tulsky; Alan M Jette
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Establishing clinical severity for PROMIS® measures in adult patients with rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Vivek Nagaraja; Constance Mara; Puja P Khanna; Rajaie Namas; Amber Young; David A Fox; Timothy Laing; William J McCune; Carol Dodge; Debra Rizzo; Maha Almackenzie; Dinesh Khanna
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Social Participation of Burn Survivors and the General Population in Work and Employment: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Profile Study.

Authors:  Cayla J Saret; Pengsheng Ni; Molly Marino; Emily Dore; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 1.819

View more
  1 in total

1.  Developing trajectories of social recovery after burn injury: Preliminary results from the LIBRE Journey Study.

Authors:  Brian M Kelter; Lauren J Shepler; Pengsheng Ni; Mary D Slavin; Amy Acton; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.609

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.