| Literature DB >> 31710682 |
Lynne Benavides1, Vivian Shie2, Brennan Yee2, Miranda Yelvington3, Laura C Simko2, Audrey E Wolfe2, Kara McMullen4, Janelle Epp5, Ingrid Parry6, Rachel Shon7, Radha Holavanahalli8, David Herndon9, Marta Rosenberg10, Laura Rosenberg9, Walter Meyer9, Nicole Gibran10, Shelley Wiechman10, Colleen M Ryan11, Jeffrey C Schneider2.
Abstract
While disparities in healthcare outcomes and services for vulnerable populations have been documented, the extent to which vulnerable burn populations demonstrate disparities in long-term care is relatively underexplored. This study's goal was to assess for differences in long-term occupational or physical therapy (OT/PT) and psychological service use after burn injury in vulnerable populations. Data from the Burn Model System National Database (2006-2015) were analyzed. The vulnerable group included participants in one or more of these categories: 65 years of age or older, nonwhite, no insurance or Medicaid insurance, preinjury receipt of psychological therapy or counseling, preinjury alcohol and/or drug misuse, or with a preexisting disability. Primary outcomes investigated were receipt of OT/PT and psychological services. Secondary outcomes included nine OT/PT subcategories. Outcomes were examined at 6, 12, and 24 months postinjury. One thousand one hundred thirty-six burn survivors (692 vulnerable; 444 nonvulnerable) were included. The vulnerable group was mostly female, unemployed at time of injury, and with smaller burns. Both groups received similar OT/PT and psychological services at all time points. Adjusted regression analyses found that while the groups received similar amounts services, some vulnerable subgroups received significantly more services. Participants 65 years of age or older, who received psychological therapy or counseling prior to injury, and with a preexisting disability received more OT/PT and psychological or peer support services at follow-up. Overall, vulnerable and nonvulnerable groups received comparable OT/PT and psychological services. The importance of long-term care among vulnerable subgroups of the burn population is highlighted by this study. Future work is needed to determine adequate levels of follow-up services. © American Burn Association 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31710682 PMCID: PMC9306190 DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irz185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Burn Care Res ISSN: 1559-047X Impact factor: 1.819