Literature DB >> 2909089

Liver metastases: detection with MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T.

J W Reinig1, A J Dwyer, D L Miller, J A Frank, G W Adams, A E Chang.   

Abstract

Nineteen patients with known liver metastases were examined with two magnetic resonance (MR) pulse sequences at 0.5 T and three pulse sequences at 1.5 T. In addition, the patients were studied with computed tomography (CT) enhanced with ethiodized oil emulsion-13 (EOE-13). At 0.5 T a spin-echo (SE) 300/22 (repetition time/echo time, msec) sequence prospectively demonstrated 92.4% of the detectable liver metastases, while an SE 2,000/80 sequence showed 52.1% of the lesions. At 1.5 T, an SE 300/25 sequence depicted 68.3% and an SE 2,000/80 sequence 71.6%, while the more T1-weighted inversion recovery (IR) 2,000/600 (repetition time/inversion time, msec) sequence demonstrated 89.5% of the lesions. EOE-13 CT scans depicted 93.3%. These findings suggest that T1-weighted imaging is as successful at demonstrating liver metastases at 1.5 T with an IR 2,000/600 sequence as at 0.5 T with an SE 300/22 sequence. At both field strengths, MR imaging of the liver is comparable to state-of-the-art CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2909089     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.170.1.2909089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison between turbo spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences.

Authors:  A Giovagnoni; E Paci; P Ercolani; B Kiefer; P Santino; A Piga
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1995 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Hepatic metastases: CT versus MR imaging at 1.5T.

Authors:  V G Vassiliades; W D Foley; J Alarcon; T Lawson; S Erickson; J B Kneeland; H V Steinberg; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

3.  Breath-hold MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison of fast and ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  J Gaa; H Fischer; G Laub; M Georgi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Liver MR imaging: comparison of respiratory triggered fast spin echo with T2-weighted spin-echo and inversion recovery.

Authors:  M T Keogan; C E Spritzer; E K Paulson; S S Paine; L Harris; J L Dahlke; J R MacFall
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

5.  Hepatic MR imaging: comparison of RARE derived sequences with conventional sequences for detection and characterization of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  P Reimer; E J Rummeny; M Wissing; G M Bongartz; G Schuierer; P E Peters
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

6.  Liver lesion detection: comparison between excitation-spoiling fat suppression and regular spin-echo at 1.5T.

Authors:  R C Semelka; H Hricak; K G Bis; W C Werthmuller; C B Higgins
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1993
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.