PURPOSE: In this study, we examined the effects of a 30-week community-based exercise program on cancer-related fatigue, quality of life, and other health-related outcomes in a sample of adults with mixed cancer diagnoses. METHODS: This prospective cohort study looked at outcomes for participants involved in the Wellspring Cancer Exercise Program in southern Ontario. The program consisted of an initial phase of two supervised sessions weekly for 10 weeks and a transition phase of one supervised session weekly for the subsequent 20 weeks. Outcomes were measured at baseline and every 10 weeks throughout the intervention, as well as at 16 weeks after program completion. RESULTS: During a period of 13 months, 229 of the 355 cancer survivors who enrolled in the exercise program consented to participate in the study. Participants attended 71% of the supervised exercise sessions in the initial phase and 49% in the transition phase. From baseline to the end of the initial phase, significant improvements in cancer-related fatigue, 6-minute walk test, social well-being, systolic blood pressure, balance, and physical activity volume were observed. During the transition phase, health-related quality of life and emotional well-being improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The Wellspring Cancer Exercise Program is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in cancer-related fatigue and functional aerobic capacity. Several other aspects of well-being in cancer survivors also improved for participants in the program. Community-based cancer exercise programs such as the Wellspring Cancer Exercise Program can improve well-being for cancer survivors and can provide an effective option that enhances sustainability and accessibility to exercise services for this population.
PURPOSE: In this study, we examined the effects of a 30-week community-based exercise program on cancer-related fatigue, quality of life, and other health-related outcomes in a sample of adults with mixed cancer diagnoses. METHODS: This prospective cohort study looked at outcomes for participants involved in the Wellspring Cancer Exercise Program in southern Ontario. The program consisted of an initial phase of two supervised sessions weekly for 10 weeks and a transition phase of one supervised session weekly for the subsequent 20 weeks. Outcomes were measured at baseline and every 10 weeks throughout the intervention, as well as at 16 weeks after program completion. RESULTS: During a period of 13 months, 229 of the 355 cancer survivors who enrolled in the exercise program consented to participate in the study. Participants attended 71% of the supervised exercise sessions in the initial phase and 49% in the transition phase. From baseline to the end of the initial phase, significant improvements in cancer-related fatigue, 6-minute walk test, social well-being, systolic blood pressure, balance, and physical activity volume were observed. During the transition phase, health-related quality of life and emotional well-being improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The Wellspring Cancer Exercise Program is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in cancer-related fatigue and functional aerobic capacity. Several other aspects of well-being in cancer survivors also improved for participants in the program. Community-based cancer exercise programs such as the Wellspring Cancer Exercise Program can improve well-being for cancer survivors and can provide an effective option that enhances sustainability and accessibility to exercise services for this population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Exercise; cancer-related fatigue; community programs; survivorship
Authors: Ali Vazir; Brian Claggett; Pardeep Jhund; Davide Castagno; Hicham Skali; Salim Yusuf; Karl Swedberg; Christopher B Granger; John J V McMurray; Marc A Pfeffer; Scott D Solomon Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-11-02 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: J David Curb; Clementina D Ceria-Ulep; Beatriz L Rodriguez; John Grove; Jack Guralnik; Brad J Willcox; Tim A Donlon; Kamal H Masaki; Randi Chen Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sandra C Hayes; Sheree Rye; Tracey Disipio; Patsy Yates; John Bashford; Chris Pyke; Christobel Saunders; Diana Battistutta; Elizabeth Eakin Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kelley R Covington; Timothy Marshall; Grace Campbell; Grant R Williams; Jack B Fu; Tiffany D Kendig; Nancy Howe; Catherine M Alfano; Mackenzi Pergolotti Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Margaret L McNeely; Christopher Sellar; Tanya Williamson; Melissa Shea-Budgell; Anil Abraham Joy; Harold Y Lau; Jacob C Easaw; Albert D Murtha; Jeffrey Vallance; Kerry Courneya; John R Mackey; Matthew Parliament; Nicole Culos-Reed Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jordan T Lee; Chad W Wagoner; Stephanie A Sullivan; Dean J Amatuli; Kirsten A Nyrop; Erik D Hanson; Lee Stoner; Brian C Jensen; Hyman B Muss; Claudio L Battaglini Journal: World J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-06-24
Authors: Scott C Adams; Anika Petrella; Catherine M Sabiston; Madison F Vani; Abha Gupta; Linda Trinh; Andrew G Matthew; Robert J Hamilton; Daniel Santa Mina Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 3.359