OBJECTIVES: To improve and broaden the applicability of performance-based measures of function for use in clinical and research settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional repeated-measures study. SETTING: Research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Population-based sample of Japanese Americans without significant functional impairments aged 35 to 55 and 56 to 71 (N=203). MEASUREMENTS: Performance-based measures of physical function, including range of standard tests, newer automated measures of balance and strength and data on cognitive function, lifestyle, medical history, and physical activity. RESULTS: Of the nonplatform balance measures, only the one-leg stand was reliable (reliability coefficient (rc) =0.69) and able to discriminate between functional levels. Combining the Fourth National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey protocol of folded arm position while standing on a foam pad with the more-sophisticated balance platform test had the highest reliability and discrimination. With the strength chair, high rcs (0.88-0.96) were found for upper and lower extremity tests. Timed chair stands, a test of lower extremity and central strength were reliable. The 6-minute walk had a high rc (0.90). CONCLUSION: Many performance tests used today are not reliable. Only a few discriminate between the most highly functioning individuals and individuals with good function. Thus, a new recommended battery includes unassisted single-leg stand, balance platform "foam pad, eyes closed," elbow flexion and knee extension strength (strength chair), grip strength, timed chair stands, and the 6-minute walk. These simple performance-based tests have good reliability and discrimination across the range of function and can be used in most clinical and research settings to quickly assess global functional level.
OBJECTIVES: To improve and broaden the applicability of performance-based measures of function for use in clinical and research settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional repeated-measures study. SETTING: Research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Population-based sample of Japanese Americans without significant functional impairments aged 35 to 55 and 56 to 71 (N=203). MEASUREMENTS: Performance-based measures of physical function, including range of standard tests, newer automated measures of balance and strength and data on cognitive function, lifestyle, medical history, and physical activity. RESULTS: Of the nonplatform balance measures, only the one-leg stand was reliable (reliability coefficient (rc) =0.69) and able to discriminate between functional levels. Combining the Fourth National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey protocol of folded arm position while standing on a foam pad with the more-sophisticated balance platform test had the highest reliability and discrimination. With the strength chair, high rcs (0.88-0.96) were found for upper and lower extremity tests. Timed chair stands, a test of lower extremity and central strength were reliable. The 6-minute walk had a high rc (0.90). CONCLUSION: Many performance tests used today are not reliable. Only a few discriminate between the most highly functioning individuals and individuals with good function. Thus, a new recommended battery includes unassisted single-leg stand, balance platform "foam pad, eyes closed," elbow flexion and knee extension strength (strength chair), grip strength, timed chair stands, and the 6-minute walk. These simple performance-based tests have good reliability and discrimination across the range of function and can be used in most clinical and research settings to quickly assess global functional level.
Authors: Meghan B Mitchell; L Stephen Miller; John L Woodard; Adam Davey; Peter Martin; Molly Burgess; Leonard W Poon Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2010-10-25
Authors: Shabbir M H Alibhai; Sara O'Neill; Karla Fisher-Schlombs; Henriette Breunis; Joseph M Brandwein; Narhari Timilshina; George A Tomlinson; Heidi D Klepin; S Nicole Culos-Reed Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Daniel K White; Yuqing Zhang; Jingbo Niu; Julie J Keysor; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Tuhina Neogi Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Lu Tian; David Green; Kiang Liu; Jin Tan; Yihua Liao; William H Pearce; Joseph R Schneider; Paul Ridker; Nader Rifai; Frederick Hoff; Michael H Criqui Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-08-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Philip Ades; Jack M Guralnik; Alan Dyer; Luigi Ferrucci; Kiang Liu; Miriam Nelson; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Linda Van Horn; Daniel Garside; Melina Kibbe; Kathryn Domanchuk; James H Stein; Yihua Liao; Huimin Tao; David Green; William H Pearce; Joseph R Schneider; David McPherson; Susan T Laing; Walter J McCarthy; Adhir Shroff; Michael H Criqui Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 56.272