Literature DB >> 9718540

Cardiac rehabilitation: gender differences in factors influencing participation.

L Lieberman1, M Meana, D Stewart.   

Abstract

This study investigates gender differences in the barriers and incentives that are most influential in the coronary patient's decision to participate in cardiac rehabilitation programs (CRPs) and suggests strategies to counter these barriers. Patient surveys were administered to consecutive English-speaking attenders and referred nonattenders to a cardiac rehabilitation center at a university healthcare system in Toronto, Canada. A survey questionnaire, constructed from a literature review and advice from key informants, examined potential factors affecting decisions to engage in CRPs. One hundred twenty-nine attenders at a CRP and 61 referred nonattenders completed the questionnaire. Physician recommendation was reported to be the most important factor influencing both women's and men's decisions to participate in CRPs, followed by encouragement from family members. For women who had attended CRP, encouragement from their adult children was significantly more influential than it was for men. Attention to health promotion was also a significantly more powerful motivator for women than it was for men. For CRP nonattenders, concomitant illness, transportation problems, and inconvenient timing of the program were stated to be the three most important barriers to CRP participation in both sexes, although women rated concomitant illness as a significantly more powerful barrier than did men. The decision to participate in CRPs involves several factors, some of which are different or more important for women. As physician recommendations continue to be the single most important factor in motivating both men and women to attend, strengthened and increased physician endorsement will likely encourage higher levels of participation in CRPs. For women, permission should be sought to discuss the advantages of CRPs with adult children who are apparently influential in the decision. As women nonattenders are more concerned than men about the effects of concomitant illnesses, reassurance should be provided about customized programs and exercise targets that consider the needs and limitations of individuals with other health conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9718540     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health        ISSN: 1059-7115            Impact factor:   2.681


  27 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting levels of physical activity in adults.

Authors:  Vern Seefeldt; Robert M Malina; Michael A Clark
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Geographic issues in cardiac rehabilitation utilization: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yvonne W Leung; Janette Brual; Alison Macpherson; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 4.078

3.  Capacity and equity in cardiac rehabilitation in the eastern region: good and bad news.

Authors:  S Jennings; D Carey
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Effects of the community-based Wellspring Cancer Exercise Program on functional and psychosocial outcomes in cancer survivors.

Authors:  D Santa Mina; D Au; J Brunet; J Jones; G Tomlinson; N Taback; D Field; A Berlingeri; H Bradley; D Howell
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Predicting cardiac rehabilitation attendance in a gender-tailored randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Theresa M Beckie; Jason W Beckstead
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 6.  Cardiac Rehabilitation for Women: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Solutions.

Authors:  Marta Supervía; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Colin Yeung; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Ray W Squires; Carmen M Pérez-Terzic; LaPrincess C Brewer; Shawn E Leth; Randal J Thomas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Monitoring visual status: why patients do or do not comply with practice guidelines.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Derek S Brown; Emily Streyer Carlisle; Gabriel A Picone; Paul P Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  A multisite examination of sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers by participation status.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Shannon Gravely-Witte; Sheena Kayaniyil; Janette Brual; Neville Suskin; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Depression as a predictor of work resumption following myocardial infarction (MI): a review of recent research evidence.

Authors:  Adrienne O'Neil; Kristy Sanderson; Brian Oldenburg
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Disparities in women's referral to and enrollment in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jerilyn K Allen; Lisa Benz Scott; Kerry J Stewart; Deborah Rohm Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.