| Literature DB >> 29089630 |
Christopher R Gourley1, Nicholas M Negretti1, Michael E Konkel2.
Abstract
Accurate repair of DNA damage is crucial to ensure genome stability and cell survival of all organisms. Bile functions as a defensive barrier against intestinal colonization by pathogenic microbes. Campylobacter jejuni, a leading bacterial cause of foodborne illness, possess strategies to mitigate the toxic components of bile. We recently found that growth of C. jejuni in medium with deoxycholate, a component of bile, caused DNA damage consistent with the exposure to reactive oxygen species. We hypothesized that C. jejuni must repair DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen species to restore chromosomal integrity. Our efforts focused on determining the importance of the putative AddAB DNA repair proteins. A C. jejuni addAB mutant demonstrated enhanced sensitivity to deoxycholate and was impaired in DNA double strand break repair. Complementation of the addAB mutant restored resistance to deoxycholate, as well as function of the DNA double strand break repair system. The importance of these findings translated to the natural host, where the AddAB system was found to be required for efficient C. jejuni colonization of the chicken intestine. This research provides new insight into the molecular mechanism utilized by C. jejuni, and possibly other intestinal pathogens, to survive in the presence of bile.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29089630 PMCID: PMC5665897 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14646-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Addition of C. jejuni recA and putative addAB genes functionally complement an E. coli recBCD mutant. Given the high level of identity in the addA and addB gene sequences amongst the C. jejuni strains, we arbitrarily selected the putative addA and addB genes from C. jejuni strain 81–176 for these experiments. E. coli strain V3060 was transformed with an empty vector, with recA from C. jejuni strain 81–176, or with addAB and recA from C. jejuni strain 81–176. The cultures were grown in triplicate in LB broth for 18.5 hours with or without 0.0025 µg/mL of ciprofloxacin. Shown is the mean ratio (with ciprofloxacin/without ciprofloxacin) and standard deviation of the OD600 between the two culture treatments. A significant difference was observed in ciprofloxacin resistance in the E. coli strain harboring the C. jejuni recA gene alone and the E. coli transformed with the C. jejuni recA and addAB genes (*p < 0.05) compared to E. coli with the empty vector. An ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was done to evaluate significance.
Figure 2There is a threshold concentration of deoxycholate (DOC) needed to induce DNA damage. C. jejuni strain F38011 was grown for 20 hours in MH broth with 0.025% to 0.3% (w/v) DOC. Samples were collected and subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to evaluate DNA integrity. Limited to no damage was observed at a concentration less than or equal to 0.05% DOC, while damage was apparent in 0.1% DOC. One asterisk (*) indicates intact DNA, and two asterisks (**) indicate DNA fragments. Contrast is enhanced for clarity, see Supplementary Figure 3 for original image.
Figure 3The C. jejuni addAB mutant demonstrates enhanced sensitivity to deoxycholate. Cultures of the C. jejuni F38011 wild-type strain, addAB mutant, and addAB mutant harboring addAB in cis (complemented isolate) were adjusted to an OD540 of 0.1. Ten-fold serial dilutions were spotted on to either MH agar or MH agar with 0.1% deoxycholate (DOC), and growth was evaluated after 48 hours of incubation.
Figure 4The C. jejuni addAB mutant is deficient in DNA double strand break repair. DNA double strand breaks were introduced by a 15-minute treatment with ciprofloxacin, after which the bacteria were transferred to MH broth. Aliquots were collected every 45 minutes to evaluate DNA double strand break repair by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. A bacterial sample was collected prior to ciprofloxacin treatment as a negative control (untreated sample). Intact DNA was quantitated using relative band intensity, with the untreated sample set to 100%. Three biological replicates ± standard deviation are plotted for each time point. Significance between the C. jejuni wild-type strain (•) and the addAB mutant (▪) was calculated for each time point by one-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test, and indicated by an asterisk (*p < 0.05).
Figure 5The AddAB DNA repair system of C. jejuni is essential for efficient colonization of chickens. The experiment was performed as outlined in ‘Materials and Methods.’ Panels (a) and (b): C. jejuni recovered from the duodenum, inoculated either alone (a) or in competition (b) with equal proportion of the C. jejuni wild-type strain and addAB mutant (∆addAB), or equal proportion of the C. jejuni wild-type strain and complemented addAB mutant (∆addAB + addAB). Panels (c) and (d): C. jejuni recovered from the cecum either inoculated alone (c) or in competition (d). ND indicates that no C. jejuni were detected (limit of detection > 102 CFU/g). The horizontal bar with whiskers represents the median level of colonization and the interquartile range. The asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the CFU recovered versus the C. jejuni addAB mutant, as judged by a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons. C. jejuni was not recovered from any of the uninoculated chickens.
Figure 6Infection of chickens does not alter the bile concentration in the intestine. Total bile concentration was determined in the duodenum (Panel a) and cecum (Panel b) of mock inoculated chickens (control) and chickens inoculated with C. jejuni wild-type strain using a bile acid assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich). The total CFU recovered from C. jejuni wild-type inoculated chickens was compared to the concentration of bile in the duodenum (Panel c) and the cecum (Panel d). The concentration of bile was independent from the number of live C. jejuni recovered. The horizontal bar with whiskers represents the median bile concentration and the interquartile range.
Bacterial strains, vectors, and oligonucleotides used in this study.
| Strain | |
|---|---|
|
| Outbreak associated with raw milk[ |
|
| Human case of diarrhea[ |
|
| Takara (Clontech) |
|
|
|
|
| |
| pBSK-Kan2 |
|
| pBSK- | This work |
| pBSK- | This work |
| pBSK- | This work |
| prRNA-Hygro- | This work |
| pacycDUETTM−1 | Novagen |
| pacycDUET- | This work |
| pacycDUET- | This work |
| Oligo name | Sequence |
| Mutant Generation Primers | |
|
| 5′-TATAGGGCGAATTGGGTACCCCTTCTTTAGCAATTTGCGCAG-3′ |
|
| 5′-GATCGGATCCGGAAAATGAAATTCAAATTTTGGAAATATAAAC-3′ |
|
| 5′-TTCATTTTCCGGATCCGATCTGCGCCCTTTAGT-3′ |
|
| 5′-ATTAAAATGACTGCAGGTGTTCCTTTCCAAGTTAATTGCG-3′ |
|
| 5′-ACACCTGCAGTCATTTTAATTCCTTTTTATAAATGAGTTTATAAGG-3′ |
|
| 5′-GGGAACAAAAGCTGGAGCTCAAATTTCACAACTTTCCCTTAGTG-3′ |
|
| 5′-TATAGGGCGAATTGGGTACCCTCTCTTACATCAAGCCTC-3′ |
|
| 5′-GATCGGATCCGATGAAAATGCAAGCGTGG-3′ |
|
| 5′-CATTTTCATCGGATCCGATCTGCGCCCTTTAGT-3′ |
|
| 5′-TGCTCAATGACTGCAGGTGTTCCTTTCCAAGTTAATTG-3′ |
|
| 5′-ACACCTGCAGTCATTGAGCATTTAATTCGTAGC-3′ |
|
| 5′-GGGAACAAAAGCTGGAGCTCTGGCCTTATGGTATTTTGC-3′ |
| Complementation Primers | |
| cysMprom XbaI FW | 5′-ATATATTCTAGACATCAGTTTTATTGGTTTTGGTACTTTTTCAACTC-3′ |
| cysMprom SphI BamHI RV | 5′-ATAGGATCCGCATGCAATTTTAATATCCTTTTTTGTTTAATAATGATAGTTTTATAAAAG-3′ |
| addBA F38011 sphI FW | 5′-ATATATGCATGCATGAAATTAAGAATTTTTAGTTCTTCAAGACAAATTAGAG-3′ |
| addBA_F38011 BamHI RV | 5′-ATATATGGATCCTTATATTTCCAAAATTTGAATTTCATTTTCCAAACAATAAAC-3′ |
| HygR EcoRI FW | 5′-ATATATGCATGCATGAAATTAAGAATTTTTAGTTCTTCAAGACAAATTAGAG-3′ |
| HygR PstI RV | 5′-ATATATCTGCAGTTATCATGCCTTTCTTTGTCTGTATTC-3′ |
| Cipro Sensitivity primers | |
| BamHI | 5′-TATATAGGATCCATGAAATTAAGAATTTTTAGCTCTTCAAGG-3′ |
| SacI | 5′-TATATAGAGCTCTTATATTTCCAAAATTTGAATTTCATTTTCC-3′ |
| NcoI | 5′-TATATACCATGGATGAAATTAAGAATTTTTAGCTCTTCAAGG-3′ |
| PstI | 5′-TATATACTGCAGTTATATTTCCAAAATTTGAATTTCATTTTCC-3′ |
| NdeI | 5′-TATATACATATGGATGATAATAAAAGAAAATCTCTAGAC-3′ |
| KpnI | 5′-TATATAGGTACCTTATTCTTCTCCTTCGTCATCTTC-3′ |
| RT-qPCR Primers | |
| RpoA RT-F | 5′-CGAGCTTGCTTTGATGAGTG-3′ |
| RpoA RT-R | 5′-AGTTCCCACAGGAAAACCTA-3′ |
| AddA_RT1F | 5′-GGGTTTGGAATTTGATCATGTG-3′ |
| AddA_RT1R | 5′-ATGGAGTTGCCAACCTTGATT-3′ |
| AddB_RT1F | 5′-CCTTTCGAGTTTCCGCTTTC-3′ |
| AddB_RT1R | 5′-CGCTTAAAACCCTAGGTTCTGC-3′ |