Literature DB >> 27976495

Detection of DNA double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Yuri Kawashima1,2, Nahomi Yamaguchi1, Rie Teshima1, Hisashi Narahara3, Yoshio Yamaoka1, Hirofumi Anai2, Yoshihiro Nishida3, Katsuhiro Hanada1,2.   

Abstract

A DNA double-strand break (DSB) is one of the most cytotoxic DNA lesions because unrepaired DSBs cause chromosomal aberrations and cell death. Although many physiological DSBs occur at DNA replication sites, the molecular mechanisms underlying this remain poorly understood. There was therefore a need to develop a highly specific method to detect DSB fragments containing DNA replication sites. Here we investigated whether pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) combined with visualization of DNA replication sites by immunoblotting using halogenized deoxyuridines, such as BrdU and IdU, was sufficient for this detection. Our methodology enabled us to reproduce previously reported data. In addition, this methodology was also applied to the detection of bacterial infection-induced DSBs on human chromosomal DNA. Based on our findings, we propose that this strategy combining PFGE with immunoblot analysis will be applicable to studies analyzing the mechanistic details of DNA repair, the DNA damage response and the activity of DNA-damaging agents.
© 2016 Molecular Biology Society of Japan and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27976495     DOI: 10.1111/gtc.12457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Cells        ISSN: 1356-9597            Impact factor:   1.891


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of DNA Double-Stranded Breaks Using the Comet Assay in Planarians.

Authors:  Paul G Barghouth; Salvador Rojas; Lacey R O'Dell; Andrew M Betancourt; Néstor J Oviedo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Quantification of radiation-induced DNA double strand break repair foci to evaluate and predict biological responses to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Sébastien Penninckx; Eloise Pariset; Egle Cekanaviciute; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2021-12-22

3.  The food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni depends on the AddAB DNA repair system to defend against bile in the intestinal environment.

Authors:  Christopher R Gourley; Nicholas M Negretti; Michael E Konkel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Measuring radiation-induced DNA damage in Cryptococcus neoformans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae using long range quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Wanchang Cui; XiangHong Li; Lisa Hull; Mang Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The benzylisoquinoline alkaloids, berberine and coptisine, act against camptothecin-resistant topoisomerase I mutants.

Authors:  Naomi Inoue; Takeshi Terabayashi; Yuri Takiguchi-Kawashima; Daisuke Fujinami; Shigeru Matsuoka; Masanori Kawano; Kazuhiro Tanaka; Hiroshi Tsumura; Toshimasa Ishizaki; Hisashi Narahara; Daisuke Kohda; Yoshihiro Nishida; Katsuhiro Hanada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The H. pylori CagA Oncoprotein Induces DNA Double Strand Breaks through Fanconi Anemia Pathway Downregulation and Replication Fork Collapse.

Authors:  Arun Mouli Kolinjivadi; Haresh Sankar; Ramveer Choudhary; Lavina Sierra Tay; Tuan Zea Tan; Naoko Murata-Kamiya; Dominic Chih-Cheng Voon; Dennis Kappei; Masanori Hatakeyama; Vaidehi Krishnan; Yoshiaki Ito
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  AOP report: Development of an adverse outcome pathway for oxidative DNA damage leading to mutations and chromosomal aberrations.

Authors:  Eunnara Cho; Ashley Allemang; Marc Audebert; Vinita Chauhan; Stephen Dertinger; Giel Hendriks; Mirjam Luijten; Francesco Marchetti; Sheroy Minocherhomji; Stefan Pfuhler; Daniel J Roberts; Kristina Trenz; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.579

8.  Mechanism of action of non-camptothecin inhibitor Genz-644282 in topoisomerase I inhibition.

Authors:  Masahiro Nishida; Takeshi Terabayashi; Shigeru Matsuoka; Tomoko Okuma; Sawako Adachi; Tadashi Tomo; Masanori Kawano; Kazuhiro Tanaka; Hiroshi Tsumura; Hirofumi Anai; Toshimasa Ishizaki; Yoshihiro Nishida; Katsuhiro Hanada
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-09-16

Review 9.  Adverse outcome pathways for ionizing radiation and breast cancer involve direct and indirect DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, genomic instability, and interaction with hormonal regulation of the breast.

Authors:  Jessica S Helm; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.153

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.