| Literature DB >> 29089518 |
Aleksandra Wlodek1, Steve G Kendrew2,3, Nigel J Coates1,2, Adam Hold1, Joanna Pogwizd1, Steven Rudder1, Lesley S Sheehan1,2, Sarah J Higginbotham1, Anna E Stanley-Smith1,2, Tony Warneck2, Mohammad Nur-E-Alam2,4, Markus Radzom2,5, Christine J Martin2, Lois Overvoorde1, Markiyan Samborskyy6, Silke Alt7, Daniel Heine7, Guy T Carter8, Edmund I Graziani8,9, Frank E Koehn8, Leonard McDonald8, Alexander Alanine10, Rosa María Rodríguez Sarmiento10, Suzan Keen Chao10, Hasane Ratni10, Lucinda Steward10, Isobel H Norville11, Mitali Sarkar-Tyson11,12, Steven J Moss1,2, Peter F Leadlay6, Barrie Wilkinson13,14,15, Matthew A Gregory16,17.
Abstract
Erythromycin, avermectin and rapamycin are clinically useful polyketide natural products produced on modular polyketide synthase multienzymes by an assembly-line process in which each module of enzymes in turn specifies attachment of a particular chemical unit. Although polyketide synthase encoding genes have been successfully engineered to produce novel analogues, the process can be relatively slow, inefficient, and frequently low-yielding. We now describe a method for rapidly recombining polyketide synthase gene clusters to replace, add or remove modules that, with high frequency, generates diverse and highly productive assembly lines. The method is exemplified in the rapamycin biosynthetic gene cluster where, in a single experiment, multiple strains were isolated producing new members of a rapamycin-related family of polyketides. The process mimics, but significantly accelerates, a plausible mechanism of natural evolution for modular polyketide synthases. Detailed sequence analysis of the recombinant genes provides unique insight into the design principles for constructing useful synthetic assembly-line multienzymes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29089518 PMCID: PMC5663706 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01344-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 17.694
Fig. 1Pathway for the biosynthesis of 1 and organisation of the rapamycin PKS. The repetitive, modular nature of each PKS protein is clearly evident. The circles represent individual catalytic domains: CoL = CoA ligase like; KS = β-ketoacyl-ACP synthase; AT = acyltransferase; DH = dehydratase; ER = enoyl reductase; KR = β-ketoacyl-ACP reductase; ACP = acylcarrier protein. Filled circles represent inactive domains. hCHCA = trans-4-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid which is fed to the strain ISOM-4010 to initiate the biosynthesis of 1 and rapalogs 2–8
Fig. 2Structures of isolated rapalogs (2–8) encompassing a range of macrolactone ring sizes. C32 of rapamycin is labelled and is the site of the chemical change expected from the attempted rational bioengineering experiment via a reductive loop swap
Biological activity of rapalogs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapamycin | Natural | 5.4 | <1 | <0.25 |
|
| Natural | 2.5 | N/A | <0.25 |
|
| +1 | 6.5 | N/A | <2 |
|
| −1 | 7.9 | 100 | <2 |
|
| −3 | 370 | 300 | <64 |
|
| −5 | 460 | >1900 | >64 |
|
| −6 | >1000 | 1000 | >64 |
Comparison of FKBP12 PPIase inhibition, mTORC1 pathway inhibition (p-S6) and S. cerevisiae MIC values for a selection of rapalogs.
Fig. 3Comparison of the chemical structures isolated from each of the novel strains and the rapamycin PKS modular alignment for each of the sequenced PKS genes. Circles show enzymatic domains in each module. Modules 11–14 encoded by RapC are not shown
Fig. 4a Analysis of junctions at contraction regions found following analysis of the rapamycin PKS genes present in strains producing high titres of ring contracted rapalogs. Potential recombination hotspots are shown with red boxes, strain numbers are shown above the junctions. Domain boundaries corresponding to the Ketosynthase (KS), Acyltransferase (AT), Enoyl Reductase (ER), Ketoreductase (KR) and Acylcarrier Protein (ACP) are highlighted. b A similarity graph generated using Plotcon (http://emboss.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/emboss/plotcon, generated via comparison of all of the modules in the native rapamycin PKS