| Literature DB >> 29084532 |
Jéssica Alonso-Molero1, Carmen González-Donquiles2, Camilo Palazuelos3, Tania Fernández-Villa1, Elena Ramos1, Marina Pollán4,5, Nuria Aragonés4,5, Javier Llorca3,4, M Henar Alonso4,6,7,8, Adonina Tardón4,9, Pilar Amiano4,10, José Juan Jiménez Moleon4,11, Rosana Peiró Pérez4,12, Rocío Capelo13, Antonio J Molina1, Inés Gómez Acebo3,4, Marcela Guevara10, Beatriz Perez-Gomez4,5,14, Virginia Lope4,5, José María Huerta4,15, Gemma Castaño-Vinyals4,16,17,18, Manolis Kogevinas4,16,17,18,19, Victor Moreno4,6,7,8, Vicente Martín4,20.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of our investigation is to study the relationship between the rs4939827 SNP in the SMAD7 gene, Mediterranean diet pattern and the risk of colorectal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Gene-environment; Mediterranean diet; SMAD7; rs4939827
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29084532 PMCID: PMC5661920 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-017-0485-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Fig. 1Signaling pathway TGFβ-SMAD
Descriptive analysis results. Characteristics of cases and controls
| CONTROLS | CASES |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | |||
| 2409 | 1087 | – | ||||
| Age | (Mean/SD) | 63.13 | 11.5 | 66.64 | 10.4 | – |
| Sex | Men | 1300 | 54 | 708 | 65.1 | <0.0001 |
| Women | 1109 | 46 | 379 | 34.9 | ||
| First Degree Family History | No | 2081 | 90.6 | 855 | 82.1 | <0.0001 |
| Yes | 216 | 9.4 | 186 | 17.9 | ||
| Cultural level | Less than primary school | 409 | 17 | 288 | 26.5 | <0.0001 |
| Primary school | 803 | 33.3 | 458 | 42.1 | ||
| Secundary school | 698 | 29 | 221 | 20.3 | ||
| University | 499 | 20.7 | 120 | 11 | ||
| BMI | Normal weight | 759 | 31.5 | 259 | 23.8 | <0.0001 |
| Less than normal weight | 23 | 1 | 13 | 1.2 | ||
| Overweight | 873 | 36.2 | 399 | 36.7 | ||
| Obesity | 754 | 31.3 | 416 | 38.3 | ||
| Total energy (Kcal/Day) | Low | 795 | 33 | 296 | 27.2 | <0.0001 |
| Medium | 794 | 33 | 320 | 29.4 | ||
| High | 820 | 34 | 471 | 43.3 | ||
| METS | Sedentarism | 855 | 35.5 | 468 | 43.1 | <0.0001 |
| Low physical activity | 385 | 16 | 134 | 12.3 | ||
| Moderate physical activity | 313 | 13 | 109 | 10 | ||
| High physical activity | 856 | 35.5 | 376 | 34.6 | ||
N Number, BMI Body Mass Index, METS Metabolic Equivalent of Task. The cut point for category of total energy are <1586.3 Kcal/day, ≥ 1586.3 Kcal/day & < 2046.4 Kcal/day and ≤2046.4 for low, medium and high level respectively.For the physical activity, the cut points are 0 when the there is no physical activity, < 8 METS*hours/week for low physical activity, ≥ 8 and < 16 METS*hours/week for moderated physical activity and >16 METS*hours/week for high physical activity (according to American College of Sport Medicine)
Fig. 2Algorithm for cases and controls for this study, selected from the population which participated in the project
Association between intake levels of food components in the Mediterranean diet anc case (affection) status. The cut points are based on the score criteria for Sofi’s Mediterranean diet pattern
| CONTROLS | CASES | OR minimally adjusted | CI (95%) | OR adjusted | CI (95%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | ||||||
| 2409 | 1087 | ||||||||
| Alcohol | Moderate intake (12 g/day-24 g/day) | 612 | 25.4 | 386 | 35.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Hight intake (>24 g/day) | 1471 | 61.1 | 537 | 49.4 | 1.17 | 0.92–1.49 | 0.76 | 0.60–0.97 | |
| Low intake (<12 g/day) | 326 | 13.5 | 164 | 15.1 | 0.77 | 0.61–0.98 | 1.04 | 0.81–1.33 | |
| Vegetables | Low intake (<100 g/day) | 563 | 23.4 | 306 | 28.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Moderate intake (100 g/day-250 g/day) | 1378 | 57.2 | 624 | 57.4 | 0.82 | 0.68–0.98 | 0.85 | 0.70–1.03 | |
| Hig/dayh intake (>250) | 468 | 19.4 | 157 | 14.4 | 0.54 | 0.42–0.70 | 0.55 | 0.42–0.72 | |
| Legumes | Low intake (<70 g/day) | 1561 | 64.8 | 670 | 61.6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Moderate intake (70 g/day-140 g/day) | 383 | 15.9 | 177 | 16.3 | 0.94 | 0.76–1.16 | 0.97 | 0.77–1.21 | |
| Hig/dayh intake (>140 g/day) | 465 | 19.3 | 240 | 22.1 | 0.75 | 0.60–0.92 | 0.77 | 0.61–0.96 | |
| Meat | Low intake (<80 g/day) | 185 | 7.7 | 152 | 14.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Moderate intake (80 g/day-120 g/day) | 442 | 18.3 | 236 | 21.7 | 1.4 | 1.15–1.70 | 1.29 | 1.05–1.60 | |
| Hig/dayh intake (>120 g/day) | 1782 | 74.0 | 699 | 64.3 | 1.98 | 1.54–2.55 | 1.74 | 1.32–2.30 | |
| Dairy products | Low intake (<180 g/day) | 1541 | 64.0 | 693 | 63.8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Moderate intake (180 g/day-270 g/day) | 557 | 23.1 | 250 | 23.0 | 0.95 | 0.74–1.23 | 0.97 | 0.74–1.28 | |
| Hig/dayh intake (>270 g/day) | 311 | 12.9 | 144 | 13.2 | 1.02 | 0.82–1.29 | 1.01 | 0.79–1.30 | |
| Fruits | Low intake (<150 g/day) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Moderate intake (150 g/day-300 g/day) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Hig/dayh intake (>300 g/day) | 2409 | 100 | 1087 | 100 | omitted | omitted | |||
| Cereals | Low intake (<130 g/day) | 2327 | 96.6 | 1047 | 96.3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Moderate intake (130 g/day-195 g/day) | 71 | 2.9 | 32 | 2.9 | 0.97 | 0.62–1.51 | 1.08 | 0.68–1.74 | |
| Hig/dayh intake (>195 g/day) | 11 | 0.5 | 8 | 0.7 | 1.57 | 0.62–4.01 | 1.42 | 0.50–4.02 | |
| Fish | Low intake (<100 g/day) | 169 | 7.0 | 91 | 8.4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Moderate intake (100 g/day-250 g/day) | 663 | 27.5 | 304 | 28.0 | 0.91 | 0.67–1.22 | 0.9 | 0.65–1.25 | |
| Hig/dayh intake (>250 g/day) | 1577 | 65.5 | 692 | 63.7 | 0.82 | 0.62–1.09 | 0.84 | 0.62–1.16 | |
| Olive oil | Low intake (<0.1 g/day) | 115 | 10.6 | 245 | 10.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Moderate intake (0.1 g/day-0.99 g/day) | 206 | 19.0 | 513 | 21.3 | 0.88 | 0.72–1.07 | 0.85 | 0.69–1.05 | |
| Hig/dayh intake (>1 g/day) | 766 | 70.5 | 1651 | 68.5 | 0.85 | 0.67–1.10 | 0.91 | 0.70–1.21 | |
The minimally adjusted odds ratio (OR) was calculated adjusting by sex, age (as continuous variable) and educational level from a multivariate logistic mixed model.Area was used as random variable. The adjusted odds ratios were calculating taking into account the variables mentioned before and BMI, total energy intake, family history fist degree, race and METS. (N: Number; CI: Confidence Interval). Cut-offs are based on score criteria of Sofi’s Mediterranean Pattern [19]
Association between SNP rs4939827 and the Mediterranean dietary pattern adherence in relation with colorectal cancer taking into account the genotype
| Cases | Controls | Adjusted OR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | OR | CI 95% | |
| Low | 341 | 31.4 | 594 | 24.7 | 1 | – |
| TT | 110 | 32.2 | 171 | 28.8 | 1 | – |
| CT | 169 | 49.6 | 302 | 50.8 | 0.83 | 0.59–1.17 |
| CC | 62 | 18.2 | 121 | 20.4 | 0.70 | 0.44–1.08 |
| Medium | 431 | 39.7 | 1010 | 41.9 | 0.85 | 0.70–1.03 |
| TT | 154 | 35.7 | 316 | 31.29 | 1 | – |
| CT | 211 | 49 | 478 | 47.2 | 0.87 | 0.65–1.15 |
| CC | 66 | 15.3 | 216 | 21.38 | 0.64 | 0.44–0.93 |
| High | 315 | 29.0 | 805 | 33.4 | 0.64 | 0.51–0.79 |
| TT | 123 | 39.1 | 242 | 30.1 | 1 | – |
| CT | 144 | 45.7 | 405 | 50.3 | 0.75 | 0.55–1.02 |
| CC | 48 | 15.2 | 158 | 19.6 | 0.63 | 0.42–0.96 |
CT vs TT: Adjusted Odd Ratio (OR) = 0.82 and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.69–0.98
CC vs TT: OR = 0.65 and 95% CI = 0.51–0.81
The adjusted odds ratios (OR) was calculating taking into account the variables sex, age, educational level, BMI, total energy intake, family history fist degree, METS. Area was used as random variable (N: Number; CI: Confidence Interval)
Fig. 3Association between SNP rs4939827 and the Mediterranean dietary pattern adherence in relation with colorectal cancer taking into account the genotype. Reference: TT genotype. Vertical axis: Adjusted Odd Ratio (The adjusted odds ratios (OR) was calculating taking into account the variables sex, age, socioeconomic level, BMI, total energy intake, family history fist degree, METS and area was used as random variable). Abscissa axis: Mediterranean Diet Pattern Adherence