Literature DB >> 29083221

Testing positive for a genetic predisposition to depression magnifies retrospective memory for depressive symptoms.

Matthew S Lebowitz1, Woo-Kyoung Ahn2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Depression, like other mental disorders and health conditions generally, is increasingly construed as genetically based. This research sought to determine whether merely telling people that they have a genetic predisposition to depression can cause them to retroactively remember having experienced it.
METHOD: U.S. adults (men and women) were recruited online to participate (Experiment 1: N = 288; Experiment 2: N = 599). After conducting a test disguised as genetic screening, we randomly assigned some participants to be told that they carried elevated genetic susceptibility to depression, whereas others were told that they did not carry this genetic liability or were told that they carried elevated susceptibility to a different disorder. Participants then rated their experience of depressive symptoms over the prior 2 weeks on a modified version of the Beck Depression Inventory-II.
RESULTS: Participants who were told that their genes predisposed them to depression generally reported higher levels of depressive symptomatology over the previous 2 weeks, compared to those who did not receive this feedback.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the central role of self-report in psychiatric diagnosis, these findings highlight potentially harmful consequences of personalized genetic testing in mental health. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29083221      PMCID: PMC5679424          DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  23 in total

Review 1.  Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.

Authors:  Michael D Robinson; Gerald L Clore
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm.

Authors:  L Ross; M R Lepper; M Hubbard
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1975-11

3.  Science and commerce. Gene tests for psychiatric risk polarize researchers.

Authors:  Jennifer Couzin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risks of illness: a systematic review.

Authors:  C Shaw; K Abrams; T M Marteau
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Anticipating the Ethical Challenges of Psychiatric Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Shawna Benston
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 6.  Cognition and depression: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Ian H Gotlib; Jutta Joormann
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 18.561

7.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Authors:  Michael Buhrmester; Tracy Kwang; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

8.  Self-stigma and its correlates among outpatients with depressive disorders.

Authors:  Cheng-Fang Yen; Cheng-Chun Chen; Yu Lee; Tze-Chun Tang; Ju-Yu Yen; Chih-Hung Ko
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Psychiatrist attitudes towards pharmacogenetic testing, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, and integrating genetic counseling into psychiatric patient care.

Authors:  Carmela Thompson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.222

10.  Harm, hype and evidence: ELSI research and policy guidance.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Yann Joly; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  9 in total

1.  An experiment assessing effects of personalized feedback about genetic susceptibility to obesity on attitudes towards diet and exercise.

Authors:  Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Matthew S Lebowitz
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Genetic and Environmental Influences on Biological Essentialism, Heuristic Thinking, Need for Closure, and Conservative Values: Insights From a Survey and Twin Study.

Authors:  J J Morosoli; F K Barlow; L Colodro-Conde; S E Medland
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 3.  Biomedical Explanations of Psychopathology and Their Implications for Attitudes and Beliefs About Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 18.561

Review 4.  The Implications of Genetic and Other Biological Explanations for Thinking about Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Impute.me: An Open-Source, Non-profit Tool for Using Data From Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing to Calculate and Interpret Polygenic Risk Scores.

Authors:  Lasse Folkersen; Oliver Pain; Andrés Ingason; Thomas Werge; Cathryn M Lewis; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Threats to epistemic agency in young people with unusual experiences and beliefs.

Authors:  Joseph W Houlders; Lisa Bortolotti; Matthew R Broome
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  The symptom discounting effect: what to do when negative genetic test results become risk factors for alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Annalise M Perricone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Self-rated amygdala activity: an auto-biological index of affective distress.

Authors:  Katherine E MacDuffie; Annchen R Knodt; Spenser R Radtke; Timothy J Strauman; Ahmad R Hariri
Journal:  Personal Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-13

9.  Perceptions of best practices for return of results in an international survey of psychiatric genetics researchers.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; Laura Torgerson; Hadley Stevens Smith; Stacey Pereira
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 4.246

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.