Literature DB >> 35368232

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Biological Essentialism, Heuristic Thinking, Need for Closure, and Conservative Values: Insights From a Survey and Twin Study.

J J Morosoli1,2, F K Barlow3, L Colodro-Conde4, S E Medland4,3.   

Abstract

Biological essentialism, the belief that human attributes are determined by biology, is a core component of essentialist thinking. Previous studies have shown that individual differences in essentialist thinking are associated with heuristic thinking, cognitive ability and style, conservative values, and prejudice. None, however, have examined whether biological essentialism is itself heritable, or the extent to which familial aggregation explains associations with core correlates. In order to do this, we analyzed data from a genetically informative sample of families with twins in Australia (N = 2,103), as well as general population samples from the UK (N = 501) and the US (N = 500). Genetic factors had little influence in individual differences in biological essentialism or in its relationship with heuristic thinking. Conservative values were genetically correlated with cognitive styles (i.e., need for closure and heuristic thinking). These findings support a bigger role of genes in explaining the relationship between cognitive processes and moral reasoning and ideology than they do the association between cognitive processes and essentialist thinking.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological essentialism; Heuristics; Moral foundations; Motivated cognition; Need for closure; Twin study

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35368232     DOI: 10.1007/s10519-022-10101-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  28 in total

1.  Zygosity diagnosis in the absence of genotypic data: an approach using latent class analysis.

Authors:  Andrew C Heath; Dale R Nyholt; Rosalind Neuman; Pamela A F Madden; Kathleen K Bucholz; Richard D Todd; Elliot C Nelson; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2003-02

2.  A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS.

Authors:  J L HORN
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Low-effort thought promotes political conservatism.

Authors:  Scott Eidelman; Christian S Crandall; Jeffrey A Goodman; John C Blanchar
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-16

4.  Cognitive Abilities Explain Wording Effects in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.

Authors:  Timo Gnambs; Ulrich Schroeders
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 5.  Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA.

Authors:  Ilan Dar-Nimrod; Steven J Heine
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Mapping the moral domain.

Authors:  Jesse Graham; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Haidt; Ravi Iyer; Spassena Koleva; Peter H Ditto
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-08

Review 7.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Testing causality in the association between regular exercise and symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Authors:  Marleen H M De Moor; Dorret I Boomsma; Janine H Stubbe; Gonneke Willemsen; Eco J C de Geus
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2008-08

9.  The effects of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences.

Authors:  Victoria L Brescoll; Eric Luis Uhlmann; George E Newman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-12

10.  The inherence heuristic: an intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism.

Authors:  Andrei Cimpian; Erika Salomon
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 12.579

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.