BACKGROUND: Many physical interventions can improve locomotor function in individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), although the training parameters that maximize recovery are not clear. Previous studies in individuals with other neurologic injuries suggest the intensity of locomotor training (LT) may positively influence walking outcomes. However, the effects of intensity during training of individuals with iSCI have not been tested. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this pilot, blinded-assessor randomized trial was to evaluate the effects of LT intensity on walking outcomes in individuals with iSCI. METHODS: Using a crossover design, ambulatory participants with iSCI >1 year duration performed either high- or low-intensity LT for ≤20 sessions over 4 to 6 weeks. Four weeks following completion, the training interventions were alternated. Targeted intensities focused on achieving specific ranges of heart rate (HR) or ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), with intensity manipulated by increasing speeds or applying loads. RESULTS: Significantly greater increases in peak treadmill speeds (0.18 vs 0.02 m/s) and secondary measures of metabolic function and overground speed were observed following high- versus low-intensity training, with no effects of intervention order. Moderate to high correlations were observed between differences in walking speed or distances and differences in HRs or RPEs during high- versus low-intensity training. CONCLUSION: This pilot study provides the first evidence that the intensity of stepping practice may be an important determinant of LT outcomes in individuals with iSCI. Whether such training is feasible in larger patient populations and contributes to improved locomotor outcomes deserves further consideration.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Many physical interventions can improve locomotor function in individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), although the training parameters that maximize recovery are not clear. Previous studies in individuals with other neurologic injuries suggest the intensity of locomotor training (LT) may positively influence walking outcomes. However, the effects of intensity during training of individuals with iSCI have not been tested. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this pilot, blinded-assessor randomized trial was to evaluate the effects of LT intensity on walking outcomes in individuals with iSCI. METHODS: Using a crossover design, ambulatory participants with iSCI >1 year duration performed either high- or low-intensity LT for ≤20 sessions over 4 to 6 weeks. Four weeks following completion, the training interventions were alternated. Targeted intensities focused on achieving specific ranges of heart rate (HR) or ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), with intensity manipulated by increasing speeds or applying loads. RESULTS: Significantly greater increases in peak treadmill speeds (0.18 vs 0.02 m/s) and secondary measures of metabolic function and overground speed were observed following high- versus low-intensity training, with no effects of intervention order. Moderate to high correlations were observed between differences in walking speed or distances and differences in HRs or RPEs during high- versus low-intensity training. CONCLUSION: This pilot study provides the first evidence that the intensity of stepping practice may be an important determinant of LT outcomes in individuals with iSCI. Whether such training is feasible in larger patient populations and contributes to improved locomotor outcomes deserves further consideration.
Authors: Natalia Alexeeva; Carol Sames; Patrick L Jacobs; Lori Hobday; Marcello M Distasio; Sarah A Mitchell; Blair Calancie Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2011 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Steven A Kautz; Pamela W Duncan; Subashan Perera; Richard R Neptune; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Michael L Jones; Eric Harness; Paula Denison; Candy Tefertiller; Nicholas Evans; Cathy A Larson Journal: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil Date: 2012
Authors: Carey L Holleran; Don D Straube; Catherine R Kinnaird; Abigail L Leddy; T George Hornby Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2014-02-10 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Jennifer K Lotter; Christopher E Henderson; Abbey Plawecki; Molly E Holthus; Emily H Lucas; Marzieh M Ardestani; Brian D Schmit; T George Hornby Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Tanya Onushko; Gordhan B Mahtani; Gabrielle Brazg; T George Hornby; Brian D Schmit Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Marzieh M Ardestani; Christopher E Henderson; Seyed H Salehi; Gordhan B Mahtani; Brian D Schmit; T George Hornby Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Stephanie A Martinez; Nhuquynh D Nguyen; Eric Bailey; Denis Doyle-Green; Henry A Hauser; John P Handrakis; Steven Knezevic; Casey Marett; Jennifer Weinman; Angelica F Romero; Tiffany M Santiago; Ajax H Yang; Lok Yung; Pierre K Asselin; Joseph P Weir; Stephen D Kornfeld; William A Bauman; Ann M Spungen; Noam Y Harel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Syed Faraz Kazim; Christian A Bowers; Chad D Cole; Samantha Varela; Zafar Karimov; Erick Martinez; Jonathan V Ogulnick; Meic H Schmidt Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 5.590