Literature DB >> 29080945

Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics.

Marc Anton Fuessinger1, Steffen Schwarz2, Carl-Peter Cornelius3, Marc Christian Metzger2, Edward Ellis4, Florian Probst3, Wiebke Semper-Hogg2, Mathieu Gass2, Stefan Schlager5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Virtual reconstruction of large cranial defects is still a challenging task. The current reconstruction procedures depend on the surgeon's experience and skills in planning the reconstruction based on mirroring and manual adaptation. The aim of this study is to propose and evaluate a computer-based approach employing a statistical shape model (SSM) of the cranial vault.
METHODS: An SSM was created based on 131 CT scans of pathologically unaffected adult crania. After segmentation, the resulting surface mesh of one patient was established as template and subsequently registered to the entire sample. Using the registered surface meshes, an SSM was generated capturing the shape variability of the cranial vault. The knowledge about this shape variation in healthy patients was used to estimate the missing parts. The accuracy of the reconstruction was evaluated by using 31 CT scans not included in the SSM. Both unilateral and bilateral bony defects were created on each skull. The reconstruction was performed using the current gold standard of mirroring the intact to the affected side, and the result was compared to the outcome of our proposed SSM-driven method. The accuracy of the reconstruction was determined by calculating the distances to the corresponding parts on the intact skull.
RESULTS: While unilateral defects could be reconstructed with both methods, the reconstruction of bilateral defects was, for obvious reasons, only possible employing the SSM-based method. Comparing all groups, the analysis shows a significantly higher precision of the SSM group, with a mean error of 0.47 mm compared to the mirroring group which exhibited a mean error of 1.13 mm. Reconstructions of bilateral defects yielded only slightly higher estimation errors than those of unilateral defects.
CONCLUSION: The presented computer-based approach using SSM is a precise and simple tool in the field of computer-assisted surgery. It helps to reconstruct large-size defects of the skull considering the natural asymmetry of the cranium and is not limited to unilateral defects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D planning; Computer-assisted surgery (CAS); Statistical shape model (SSM); Virtual defect reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29080945     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1674-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  36 in total

1.  Navigation-aided reconstruction of medial orbital wall and floor contour in cranio-maxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Rainer Schmelzeisen; Nils Claudius Gellrich; Ralf Schoen; Ralf Gutwald; Christoph Zizelmann; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Mirroring Tool: The Simplest Computer-Aided Simulation Technology?

Authors:  Haijun Gui; Huawei Yang; ShiLei Zhang; Steve G F Shen; Ming Ye; Rainer Schmelzeisen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Development and first clinical application of automated virtual reconstruction of unilateral midface defects.

Authors:  Maximilian Eberhard Hermann Wagner; Jürgen Thomas Lichtenstein; Marcel Winkelmann; Hoen-Oh Shin; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Harald Essig
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Three-dimensional elastic matching of volumes.

Authors:  M Moshfeghi; S Ranganath; K Nawyn
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  Application of virtual surgical planning with computer assisted design and manufacturing technology to cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Linping Zhao; Pravin K Patel; Mimis Cohen
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-07-13

6.  Design and development of a virtual anatomic atlas of the human skull for automatic segmentation in computer-assisted surgery, preoperative planning, and navigation.

Authors:  M C Metzger; G Bittermann; L Dannenberg; R Schmelzeisen; N-C Gellrich; B Hohlweg-Majert; C Scheifele
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  [Computer-aided reconstruction of the facial skeleton : Planning and implementation in clinical routine].

Authors:  F Wilde; A Schramm
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Using three-dimensional multigrid-based snake and multiresolution image registration for reconstruction of cranial defect.

Authors:  Yuan-Lin Liao; Chia-Feng Lu; Chieh-Tsai Wu; Jiann-Der Lee; Shih-Tseng Lee; Yung-Nien Sun; Yu-Te Wu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Feasibility of preoperative planning using anatomical facsimile models for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Corrado Toro; Massimo Robiony; Fabio Costa; Nicoletta Zerman; Massimo Politi
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Mandibular reconstruction using fibula free flap harvested using a customised cutting guide: how we do it.

Authors:  A Tarsitano; L Ciocca; R Cipriani; R Scotti; C Marchetti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.124

View more
  10 in total

1.  A Novel Method for Digital Reconstruction of the Mucogingival Borderline in Optical Scans of Dental Plaster Casts.

Authors:  Leonard Simon Brandenburg; Stefan Schlager; Lara Sophie Harzig; David Steybe; René Marcel Rothweiler; Felix Burkhardt; Benedikt Christopher Spies; Joachim Georgii; Marc Christian Metzger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Automatic virtual reconstruction of maxillofacial bone defects assisted by ICP (iterative closest point) algorithm and normal people database.

Authors:  Bimeng Jie; Boxuan Han; Baocheng Yao; Yi Zhang; Hongen Liao; Yang He
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Combining statistical shape modeling, CFD, and meta-modeling to approximate the patient-specific pressure-drop across the aortic valve in real-time.

Authors:  M J M M Hoeijmakers; I Waechter-Stehle; J Weese; F N Van de Vosse
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Synthetic skull bone defects for automatic patient-specific craniofacial implant design.

Authors:  Jianning Li; Christina Gsaxner; Antonio Pepe; Ana Morais; Victor Alves; Gord von Campe; Jürgen Wallner; Jan Egger
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  Virtual reconstruction of orbital floor defects using a statistical shape model.

Authors:  Mathieu Gass; Marc Anton Füßinger; Marc Christian Metzger; Steffen Schwarz; Johannes Daniel Bähr; Leonard Brandenburg; Julia Weingart; Stefan Schlager
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  The 3D skull 0-4 years: A validated, generative, statistical shape model.

Authors:  Eimear O' Sullivan; Lara S van de Lande; Anne-Jet C Oosting; Athanasios Papaioannou; N Owase Jeelani; Maarten J Koudstaal; Roman H Khonsari; David J Dunaway; Stefanos Zafeiriou; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2021-11-29

7.  MUG500+: Database of 500 high-resolution healthy human skulls and 29 craniotomy skulls and implants.

Authors:  Jianning Li; Marcell Krall; Florian Trummer; Afaque Rafique Memon; Antonio Pepe; Christina Gsaxner; Yuan Jin; Xiaojun Chen; Hannes Deutschmann; Ulrike Zefferer; Ute Schäfer; Gord von Campe; Jan Egger
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2021-11-04

8.  Reconstruction of dental roots for implant planning purposes: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Leonard Simon Brandenburg; Lukas Berger; Steffen Jochen Schwarz; Hans Meine; Julia Vera Weingart; David Steybe; Benedikt Christopher Spies; Felix Burkhardt; Stefan Schlager; Marc Christian Metzger
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.421

9.  Cranial reconstruction evaluation - comparison of European statistical shape model performance on Chinese dataset.

Authors:  Marc Anton Fuessinger; Marc Christian Metzger; Rene Rothweiler; Leonard Simon Brandenburg; Stefan Schlager
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2022-08-13

10.  Thickness accuracy of virtually designed patient-specific implants for large neurocranial defects.

Authors:  Claudia Wittner; Markus Borowski; Lukas Pirl; Johann Kastner; Andreas Schrempf; Ute Schäfer; Klemens Trieb; Sascha Senck
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.610

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.