Haijun Gui1, Huawei Yang, ShiLei Zhang, Steve G F Shen, Ming Ye, Rainer Schmelzeisen. 1. *Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine †Department of Dentistry, Tenth People's Hospital, Tong Ji University ‡Shanghai UEG Medical Devices Corporation, Shanghai, China §Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to present our experience in the use of the mirroring tool in computer-aided simulation (CAS) as well as to describe its diversified uses and indications systematically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2012, 144 patients underwent preoperative CAS with mirroring tool developed by our department called Accu-Navi System. Various mirroring methods were performed and classified systemically. The outcome was evaluated thru its performance intraoperatively and the results postoperatively. RESULTS: The optimal preoperative plans were achieved for all 144 patients using the mirroring tool. This provided the surgeon with accurate surgical information preoperatively and intraoperatively. There were 138 operations performed based on the preoperative plan. The duration of the operations was significantly shortened with improved surgical accuracy and safety. The mean discrepancy was confirmed to be less than 1.0 mm by comparing postoperative computed tomography with the preoperative plan. Postoperative esthetics improved remarkably along with patients' satisfaction without complications thru long-term follow-up evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: The mirroring tool with its many uses can be a valuable CAS procedure for craniofacial surgery.
PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to present our experience in the use of the mirroring tool in computer-aided simulation (CAS) as well as to describe its diversified uses and indications systematically. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2012, 144 patients underwent preoperative CAS with mirroring tool developed by our department called Accu-Navi System. Various mirroring methods were performed and classified systemically. The outcome was evaluated thru its performance intraoperatively and the results postoperatively. RESULTS: The optimal preoperative plans were achieved for all 144 patients using the mirroring tool. This provided the surgeon with accurate surgical information preoperatively and intraoperatively. There were 138 operations performed based on the preoperative plan. The duration of the operations was significantly shortened with improved surgical accuracy and safety. The mean discrepancy was confirmed to be less than 1.0 mm by comparing postoperative computed tomography with the preoperative plan. Postoperative esthetics improved remarkably along with patients' satisfaction without complications thru long-term follow-up evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: The mirroring tool with its many uses can be a valuable CAS procedure for craniofacial surgery.
Authors: Marc Anton Fuessinger; Steffen Schwarz; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Marc Christian Metzger; Edward Ellis; Florian Probst; Wiebke Semper-Hogg; Mathieu Gass; Stefan Schlager Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-10-28 Impact factor: 2.924