Literature DB >> 29080901

Genome-wide regression models considering general and specific combining ability predict hybrid performance in oilseed rape with similar accuracy regardless of trait architecture.

Christian R Werner1, Lunwen Qian1,2, Kai P Voss-Fels1, Amine Abbadi3, Gunhild Leckband3, Matthias Frisch4, Rod J Snowdon5.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Genomic prediction using the Brassica 60 k genotyping array is efficient in oilseed rape hybrids. Prediction accuracy is more dependent on trait complexity than on the prediction model. In oilseed rape breeding programs, performance prediction of parental combinations is of fundamental importance. Due to the phenomenon of heterosis, per se performance is not a reliable indicator for F1-hybrid performance, and selection of well-paired parents requires the testing of large quantities of hybrid combinations in extensive field trials. However, the number of potential hybrids, in general, dramatically exceeds breeding capacity and budget. Integration of genomic selection (GS) could substantially increase the number of potential combinations that can be evaluated. GS models can be used to predict the performance of untested individuals based only on their genotypic profiles, using marker effects previously predicted in a training population. This allows for a preselection of promising genotypes, enabling a more efficient allocation of resources. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of the Illumina Brassica 60 k SNP array for genomic prediction and compared three alternative approaches based on a homoscedastic ridge regression BLUP and three Bayesian prediction models that considered general and specific combining ability (GCA and SCA, respectively). A total of 448 hybrids were produced in a commercial breeding program from unbalanced crosses between 220 paternal doubled haploid lines and five male-sterile testers. Predictive ability was evaluated for seven agronomic traits. We demonstrate that the Brassica 60 k genotyping array is an adequate and highly valuable platform to implement genomic prediction of hybrid performance in oilseed rape. Furthermore, we present first insights into the application of established statistical models for prediction of important agronomical traits with contrasting patterns of polygenic control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29080901     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-017-3002-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  65 in total

1.  GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis.

Authors:  Yurii S Aulchenko; Stephan Ripke; Aaron Isaacs; Cornelia M van Duijn
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 4.  A user guide to the Brassica 60K Illumina Infinium™ SNP genotyping array.

Authors:  Annaliese S Mason; Erin E Higgins; Rod J Snowdon; Jacqueline Batley; Anna Stein; Christian Werner; Isobel A P Parkin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Conditional QTL mapping of oil content in rapeseed with respect to protein content and traits related to plant development and grain yield.

Authors:  Jianyi Zhao; Heiko C Becker; Dongqing Zhang; Yaofeng Zhang; Wolfgang Ecke
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Dissecting the genetic architecture of frost tolerance in Central European winter wheat.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Manje Gowda; Tobias Würschum; C Friedrich H Longin; Viktor Korzun; Sonja Kollers; Ralf Schachschneider; Jian Zeng; Rohan Fernando; Jorge Dubcovsky; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Effectiveness of genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance in different breeding populations and environments.

Authors:  Vanessa S Windhausen; Gary N Atlin; John M Hickey; Jose Crossa; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells; Babu Raman; Jill E Cairns; Amsal Tarekegne; Kassa Semagn; Yoseph Beyene; Pichet Grudloyma; Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Agronomic and Seed Quality Traits Dissected by Genome-Wide Association Mapping in Brassica napus.

Authors:  Niklas Körber; Anja Bus; Jinquan Li; Isobel A P Parkin; Benjamin Wittkop; Rod J Snowdon; Benjamin Stich
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Prediction of hybrid performance in maize with a ridge regression model employed to DNA markers and mRNA transcription profiles.

Authors:  Carola Zenke-Philippi; Alexander Thiemann; Felix Seifert; Tobias Schrag; Albrecht E Melchinger; Stefan Scholten; Matthias Frisch
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Genomic Prediction of Testcross Performance in Canola (Brassica napus).

Authors:  Habib U Jan; Amine Abbadi; Sophie Lücke; Richard A Nichols; Rod J Snowdon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  Genotyping marker density and prediction models effects in long-term breeding schemes of cross-pollinated crops.

Authors:  Júlio César DoVale; Humberto Fanelli Carvalho; Felipe Sabadin; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 5.574

Review 2.  Accelerating crop genetic gains with genomic selection.

Authors:  Kai Peter Voss-Fels; Mark Cooper; Ben John Hayes
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Strategies and considerations for implementing genomic selection to improve traits with additive and non-additive genetic architectures in sugarcane breeding.

Authors:  Kai P Voss-Fels; Xianming Wei; Elizabeth M Ross; Matthias Frisch; Karen S Aitken; Mark Cooper; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genomic prediction of hybrid crops allows disentangling dominance and epistasis.

Authors:  David González-Diéguez; Andrés Legarra; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau; Christina Lehermeier; Simon Teyssèdre; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Effect of breeding on nitrogen use efficiency-associated traits in oilseed rape.

Authors:  Andreas Stahl; Paul Vollrath; Birgit Samans; Matthias Frisch; Benjamin Wittkop; Rod J Snowdon
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Nonlinear phenotypic variation uncovers the emergence of heterosis in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  François Vasseur; Louise Fouqueau; Dominique de Vienne; Thibault Nidelet; Cyrille Violle; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola.

Authors:  Dominic Knoch; Christian R Werner; Rhonda C Meyer; David Riewe; Amine Abbadi; Sophie Lücke; Rod J Snowdon; Thomas Altmann
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 8.  Heterosis and Hybrid Crop Breeding: A Multidisciplinary Review.

Authors:  Marlee R Labroo; Anthony J Studer; Jessica E Rutkoski
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize.

Authors:  Xiaogang Liu; Hongwu Wang; Xiaojiao Hu; Kun Li; Zhifang Liu; Yujin Wu; Changling Huang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Genome-wide dissection of hybridization for fiber quality- and yield-related traits in upland cotton.

Authors:  Xiaoli Geng; Gaofei Sun; Yujie Qu; Zareen Sarfraz; Yinhua Jia; Shoupu He; Zhaoe Pan; Junling Sun; Muhammad S Iqbal; Qinglian Wang; Hongde Qin; Jinhai Liu; Hui Liu; Jun Yang; Zhiying Ma; Dongyong Xu; Jinlong Yang; Jinbiao Zhang; Zhikun Li; Zhongmin Cai; Xuelin Zhang; Xin Zhang; Guanyin Zhou; Lin Li; Haiyong Zhu; Liru Wang; Baoyin Pang; Xiongming Du
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.417

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.