Literature DB >> 29078666

Developing a robotic pancreas program: the Dutch experience.

Carolijn L Nota1,2, Maurice J Zwart3, Yuman Fong2, Jeroen Hagendoorn1, Melissa E Hogg4, Bas Groot Koerkamp5, Marc G Besselink3, I Quintus Molenaar1.   

Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery has been developed to overcome limitations of conventional laparoscopy aiming to further optimize minimally invasive surgery. Despite the fact that robotics already have been widely adopted in urology, gynecology, and several gastro-intestinal procedures, like colorectal surgery, pancreatic surgery lags behind. Due to the complex nature of the procedure, surgeons probably have been hesitant to apply minimally invasive techniques in pancreatic surgery. Nevertheless, the past few years pancreatic surgery has been catching up. An increasing number of procedures are being performed laparoscopically and robotically, despite it being a highly complex procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. Since the complex nature and extensiveness of the procedure, the start of a robotic pancreatic program should be properly prepared and should comply with several conditions within high-volume centers. Robotic training plays a significant role in the preparation. In this review we discuss the different aspects of preparation when working towards the start of a robotic pancreas program against the background of our nationwide experience in the Netherlands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic surgery; robotic surgery; training in robotic surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078666      PMCID: PMC5638300          DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2017.07.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Surg        ISSN: 2221-2965


  21 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghunandan Venkat; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Anne O Lidor; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Use of a mobile tower-based robot--The initial Xi robot experience in surgical oncology.

Authors:  Bertram Yuh; Xian Yu; John Raytis; Michael Lew; Yuman Fong; Clayton Lau
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 3.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Cohort and Registry Studies.

Authors:  Thijs de Rooij; Martijn Z Lu; M Willemijn Steen; Michael F Gerhards; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Olivier R Busch; Daan J Lips; Sebastiaan Festen; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Validation of a structured training and assessment curriculum for technical skill acquisition in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Neil Orzech; Richard K Reznick; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Impact of a Nationwide Training Program in Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy (LAELAPS).

Authors:  Thijs de Rooij; Jony van Hilst; Djamila Boerma; Bert A Bonsing; Freek Daams; Ronald M van Dam; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Casper H van Eijck; Sebastiaan Festen; Michael F Gerhards; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Erwin van der Harst; Ignace H de Hingh; Geert Kazemier; Joost Klaase; Ruben H de Kleine; Cornelis J van Laarhoven; Daan J Lips; Misha D Luyer; I Quintus Molenaar; Gijs A Patijn; Daphne Roos; Joris J Scheepers; George P van der Schelling; Pascal Steenvoorde; Menno R Vriens; Jan H Wijsman; Dirk J Gouma; Olivier R Busch; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Mastery-Based Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Curriculum: The First Step Toward Operative Robotic Proficiency.

Authors:  Melissa E Hogg; Vernissia Tam; Mazen Zenati; Stephanie Novak; Jennifer Miller; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy Biotissue Curriculum has Validity and Improves Technical Performance for Surgical Oncology Fellows.

Authors:  Vernissia Tam; Mazen Zenati; Stephanie Novak; Yong Chen; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Deepa Magge; William Gooding; Haroon Choudry; Jennifer Steve; Jennifer Steel; Amer Zureikat; Alyssa Krasinskas; Mustapha Daouadi; Kenneth K W Lee; Steven J Hughes; Herbert J Zeh; A James Moser
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Benjamin Menahem; Lydia Guittet; Andrea Mulliri; Arnaud Alves; Jean Lubrano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for T3 adenocarcinoma: A multivariable analysis from the UK Vascular Resection for Pancreatic Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  H Elberm; R Ravikumar; C Sabin; M Abu Hilal; A Al-Hilli; S Aroori; G Bond-Smith; S Bramhall; C Coldham; J Hammond; R Hutchins; C Imber; G Preziosi; A Saleh; M Silva; J Simpson; G Spoletini; D Stell; J Terrace; S White; S Wigmore; G Fusai
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.424

View more
  10 in total

1.  National Trends in Robotic Pancreas Surgery.

Authors:  Richard S Hoehn; Ibrahim Nassour; Mohamed A Adam; Sharon Winters; Alessandro Paniccia; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: trends in technique and training challenges.

Authors:  Catherine H Davis; Miral S Grandhi; Victor P Gazivoda; Alissa Greenbaum; Timothy J Kennedy; Russell C Langan; H Richard Alexander; Henry A Pitt; David A August
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 3.  Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Hepatic Surgery: An Historical Review.

Authors:  Atsushi Shimizu; Miwa Ito; Alan Kawarai Lefor
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  500 Minimally Invasive Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies: One Decade of Optimizing Performance.

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; Joal D Beane; Mazen S Zenati; Amr I Al Abbas; Brian A Boone; A James Moser; David L Bartlett; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 13.787

5.  Will It Play in Peoria? A Pilot Study of a Robotic Skills Curriculum for Surgical Oncology Fellows.

Authors:  Sarwat B Ahmad; MaryJoe Rice; Cecilia Chang; Ahmad Hamad; T Peter Kingham; Jin He; Jose M Pimiento; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection.

Authors:  Jony van Hilst; Nine de Graaf; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Prophylactic total pancreatectomy in individuals at high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PROPAN): systematic review and shared decision-making programme using decision tables.

Authors:  Lianne Scholten; Anouk Ej Latenstein; Cora M Aalfs; Marco J Bruno; Olivier R Busch; Bert A Bonsing; Bas Groot Koerkamp; I Quintus Molenaar; Dirk T Ubbink; Jeanin E van Hooft; Paul Fockens; Jolanda Glas; J Hans DeVries; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Surgical training model and safe implementation of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Japan: a technical note.

Authors:  Kosei Takagi; Yuzo Umeda; Ryuichi Yoshida; Takahito Yagi; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara; Amer H Zureikat; Melissa E Hogg; Bas Groot Koerkamp
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Performance with robotic surgery versus 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy during pancreatic and biliary anastomoses in a biotissue model: pooled analysis of two randomized trials.

Authors:  Maurice J W Zwart; Leia R Jones; Ignacio Fuente; Alberto Balduzzi; Kosei Takagi; Stephanie Novak; Luna A Stibbe; Thijs de Rooij; Jony van Hilst; L Bengt van Rijssen; Susan van Dieren; Aude Vanlander; Peter B van den Boezem; Freek Daams; J Sven D Mieog; Bert A Bonsing; Camiel Rosman; Sebastiaan Festen; Misha D Luyer; Daan J Lips; Arthur J Moser; Olivier R Busch; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Melissa E Hogg; Martijn W J Stommel; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.453

10.  Robotic Dual-Console Distal Pancreatectomy: Could it be Considered a Safe Approach and Surgical Teaching even in Pancreatic Surgery? A Retrospective Observational Study Cohort.

Authors:  M De Pastena; R Salvia; S Paiella; G Deiro; E Bannone; A Balduzzi; T Giuliani; L Casetti; M Ramera; C Filippini; G Montagnini; L Landoni; A Esposito
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.