Kosei Takagi1,2, Yuzo Umeda3, Ryuichi Yoshida3, Takahito Yagi3, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara3, Amer H Zureikat4, Melissa E Hogg5, Bas Groot Koerkamp6. 1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan. kotakagi15@gmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. kotakagi15@gmail.com. 3. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan. 4. Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. Department of Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Growing evidence for the advantages of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been demonstrated internationally. However, there has been no structured training program for RPD in Japan. Herein, we present the surgical training model of RPD and a standardized protocol for surgical technique. METHODS: The surgical training model and surgical technique were standardized in order to implement RPD safely, based on the Dutch training system collaborated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. RESULTS: The surgical training model included various trainings such as basic robotic training, simulation training, biotissue training, and a surgical video review. Furthermore, a standardized protocol on the surgical technique was established to understand the tips, tricks, and pitfalls of RPD. CONCLUSIONS: Safe implementation of RPD can be achieved through the completion of a structured training program and learning surgical technique. A nationwide structured training system should be developed to implement the program safely in Japan.
BACKGROUND: Growing evidence for the advantages of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been demonstrated internationally. However, there has been no structured training program for RPD in Japan. Herein, we present the surgical training model of RPD and a standardized protocol for surgical technique. METHODS: The surgical training model and surgical technique were standardized in order to implement RPD safely, based on the Dutch training system collaborated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. RESULTS: The surgical training model included various trainings such as basic robotic training, simulation training, biotissue training, and a surgical video review. Furthermore, a standardized protocol on the surgical technique was established to understand the tips, tricks, and pitfalls of RPD. CONCLUSIONS: Safe implementation of RPD can be achieved through the completion of a structured training program and learning surgical technique. A nationwide structured training system should be developed to implement the program safely in Japan.
Entities:
Keywords:
Pancreatoduodenectomy; Robotic surgery; Training
Authors: Melissa E Hogg; Marc G Besselink; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Abe Fingerhut; D Rohan Jeyarajah; David A Kooby; A James Moser; Henry A Pitt; Oliver A Varban; Charles M Vollmer; Herbert J Zeh; Paul Hansen Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Horacio J Asbun; Alma L Moekotte; Frederique L Vissers; Filipe Kunzler; Federica Cipriani; Adnan Alseidi; Michael I D'Angelica; Alberto Balduzzi; Claudio Bassi; Bergthor Björnsson; Ugo Boggi; Mark P Callery; Marco Del Chiaro; Felipe J Coimbra; Claudius Conrad; Andrew Cook; Alessandro Coppola; Christos Dervenis; Safi Dokmak; Barish H Edil; Bjørn Edwin; Pier C Giulianotti; Ho-Seong Han; Paul D Hansen; Nicky van der Heijde; Jony van Hilst; Caitlin A Hester; Melissa E Hogg; Nicolas Jarufe; D Rohan Jeyarajah; Tobias Keck; Song Cheol Kim; Igor E Khatkov; Norihiro Kokudo; David A Kooby; Maarten Korrel; Francisco J de Leon; Nuria Lluis; Sanne Lof; Marcel A Machado; Nicolas Demartines; John B Martinie; Nipun B Merchant; I Quintus Molenaar; Cassadie Moravek; Yi-Ping Mou; Masafumi Nakamura; William H Nealon; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Patrick Pessaux; Henry A Pitt; Patricio M Polanco; John N Primrose; Arab Rawashdeh; Dominic E Sanford; Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Shailesh V Shrikhande; John A Stauffer; Kyoichi Takaori; Mark S Talamonti; Chung N Tang; Charles M Vollmer; Go Wakabayashi; R Matthew Walsh; Shin-E Wang; Michael J Zinner; Christopher L Wolfgang; Amer H Zureikat; Maurice J Zwart; Kevin C Conlon; Michael L Kendrick; Herbert J Zeh; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Marc G Besselink Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Thijs de Rooij; Jony van Hilst; Djamila Boerma; Bert A Bonsing; Freek Daams; Ronald M van Dam; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Casper H van Eijck; Sebastiaan Festen; Michael F Gerhards; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Erwin van der Harst; Ignace H de Hingh; Geert Kazemier; Joost Klaase; Ruben H de Kleine; Cornelis J van Laarhoven; Daan J Lips; Misha D Luyer; I Quintus Molenaar; Gijs A Patijn; Daphne Roos; Joris J Scheepers; George P van der Schelling; Pascal Steenvoorde; Menno R Vriens; Jan H Wijsman; Dirk J Gouma; Olivier R Busch; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Marc G Besselink Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Thijs de Rooij; Jony van Hilst; Baki Topal; Koop Bosscha; David J Brinkman; Michael F Gerhards; Ignace H de Hingh; Tom M Karsten; Daan J Lips; Misha D Luyer; Hendrik A Marsman; L Bengt van Rijssen; M Willemijn Steen; Olivier R Busch; Sebastiaan Festen; Marc G Besselink Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jae Pil Jung; Mazen S Zenati; Mashaal Dhir; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Richard L Simmons; Melissa E Hogg Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Brian A Boone; Mazen Zenati; Melissa E Hogg; Jennifer Steve; Arthur James Moser; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; Amer H Zureikat Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 14.766