Literature DB >> 26346183

Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for T3 adenocarcinoma: A multivariable analysis from the UK Vascular Resection for Pancreatic Cancer Study Group.

H Elberm1, R Ravikumar2, C Sabin3, M Abu Hilal4, A Al-Hilli4, S Aroori5, G Bond-Smith6, S Bramhall7, C Coldham7, J Hammond8, R Hutchins6, C Imber2, G Preziosi2, A Saleh9, M Silva10, J Simpson8, G Spoletini10, D Stell5, J Terrace11, S White9, S Wigmore11, G Fusai2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most resectable pancreatic cancers are classified as T3, including those involving the porto-mesenteric vein. Survival and perioperative morbidity for venous resection have been found to be comparable to standard resection. We investigate factors associated with short and long term outcomes in pancreaticoduodenectomy with (PDVR) and without (PD) venous resection exclusively for T3 adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.
METHODS: This is a UK multicenter retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes in patients undergoing PD and PDVR. All consecutive patients with T3 only adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas undergoing surgery between December 1998 and June 2011 were included. Multivariable logistic and proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine the association between the surgical groups and in-hospital mortality (IHM) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: 1070 patients were included of whom 840 (78.5%) had PD and 230 (21.5%) had PDVR. Factors independently associated with IHM were a high creatinine (aHR 1.14, p = 0.02), post-operative bleeding (aHR 2.86, p = 0.04) and a re-laparotomy (aHR 8.42, p = 0.0001). For OS, multivariable analyses identified R1 resection margin status (aHR 1.22, p = 0.01), N1 nodal status (aHR 1.92, p = 0.0001), perineural invasion (aHR 1.37, p = 0.002), tumour size >20mm (aHR 0.63, p = 0.0001) and a relaparotomy (aHR 1.84, p = 0.0001) to be independently associated with overall mortality.
CONCLUSION: This study on T3 adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas suggests that IHM is strongly associated with perioperative complications whilst OS is affected by histological parameters. Detailed pre-operative disease evaluation and advances in oncological treatment have the potential to improve OS.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; Multivariable analysis; Outcomes; Pancreas cancer; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; T3 pancreatic cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26346183     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.08.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  11 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  Thijs de Rooij; Sjors Klompmaker; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Michael L Kendrick; Olivier R Busch; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Re-evaluation of classical prognostic factors in resectable ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  Daniel Åkerberg; Daniel Ansari; Roland Andersson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Developing a robotic pancreas program: the Dutch experience.

Authors:  Carolijn L Nota; Maurice J Zwart; Yuman Fong; Jeroen Hagendoorn; Melissa E Hogg; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Marc G Besselink; I Quintus Molenaar
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-08-21

4.  Surgical Margin Status of Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Surgery with Radical Intent: Risk Factors for the Survival Impact of Positive Margins.

Authors:  Chun-Chi Lai; Shang-Yu Wang; Chien-Hung Liao; Jun-Te Hsu; Kun-Chun Chiang; Ta-Sen Yeh; Tsann-Long Hwang; Chun-Nan Yeh
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats of Centralized Pancreatic Surgery: a Single-Center Analysis of 3000 Consecutive Pancreatic Resections.

Authors:  Fritz Klein; Uwe Pelzer; Rosa Bianca Schmuck; Thomas Malinka; Matthäus Felsenstein; Timm Denecke; Johann Pratschke; Marcus Bahra
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Xiao-Long Liu; Guang-Yi Jiang; Di Wu; Hendi Maher; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Venous occlusion test applied to the tributaries of the superior mesenteric veins of the pancreas head infiltrated by tumor.

Authors:  Enio Campos Amico; José Roberto Alves; Samir Assi João; Joafran Alexandre Costa de Medeiros; Rogério Lacerda Sousa
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-23

8.  Impact of tumor size on survival of patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Debang Li; Bin Hu; Yanming Zhou; Tao Wan; Xiaoying Si
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection favors the survival time of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Bo Xie; Ji Li; Ji-Chun Gu; Chen Jin; Cai-Feng Zou; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Early reoperation following pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact on morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival.

Authors:  Yonatan Lessing; Niv Pencovich; Nadav Nevo; Nir Lubezky; Yaacov Goykhman; Richard Nakache; Guy Lahat; Joseph M Klausner; Ido Nachmany
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.