Literature DB >> 29078644

Technical considerations for the fully robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Daniel Galvez1, Rebecca Sorber1, Ammar A Javed1, Jin He1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, has become the standard of care for many abdominal procedures. However, the technical complexity associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) due to the anatomic location and oncologic characteristics of pancreatic tumors has hindered the widespread application of minimally invasive techniques to this procedure. Recent studies have reported that for experienced surgeons, the application of robotic techniques to PD is associated with equivalent oncologic outcomes and rates of complication when compared to an open operation, and may be associated with accelerated surgical recovery. Despite these encouraging results, robotic PD (RPD) is a procedure attempted by a small group of pancreatic surgeons, leading to the great heterogeneity in the techniques used to perform this operation. Herein we describe our technique for fully RPD and demonstrate its execution with a video supplement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD); Whipple procedure; robotic surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078644      PMCID: PMC5638600          DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2017.05.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Surg        ISSN: 2221-2965


  25 in total

Review 1.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Samuel W Ross; Ramanathan Seshadri; Ryan Z Swan; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; John B Martinie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chrysoula Doula; Ioannis D Kostakis; Christos Damaskos; Nikolaos Machairas; Dimitrios V Vardakostas; Themistoklis Feretis; Evangelos Felekouras
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  A Multi-institutional Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; Lauren M Postlewait; Yuan Liu; Theresa W Gillespie; Sharon M Weber; Daniel E Abbott; Syed A Ahmad; Shishir K Maithel; Melissa E Hogg; Mazen Zenati; Clifford S Cho; Ahmed Salem; Brent Xia; Jennifer Steve; Trang K Nguyen; Hari B Keshava; Sricharan Chalikonda; R Matthew Walsh; Mark S Talamonti; Susan J Stocker; David J Bentrem; Stephanie Lumpkin; Hong J Kim; Herbert J Zeh; David A Kooby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Robotic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: Technical considerations.

Authors:  Amilcare Parisi; Jacopo Desiderio; Stefano Trastulli; Roberto Cirocchi; Caudio Renzi; Carlo Boselli; Francesco De Santis; Adolfo Petrina; Mario Annecchiarico; Michele Di Marino; Lapo Bencini; Federico Perna; Daniele Pironi; Alberto Santoro; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Long Peng; Shengrong Lin; Yong Li; Weidong Xiao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  How I Do It: Hybrid Laparoscopic and Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  R Matthew Walsh; Sricharan Chalikonda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Mingjun Wang; He Cai; Lingwei Meng; Yunqiang Cai; Xin Wang; Yongbin Li; Bing Peng
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.071

8.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer: Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; Kingshuk Choudhury; Michaela A Dinan; Shelby D Reed; Randall P Scheri; Dan G Blazer; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: experience of 22 cases.

Authors:  Francesco Corcione; Felice Pirozzi; Diego Cuccurullo; Domenico Piccolboni; Valerio Caracino; Francesco Galante; Daniele Cusano; Antonio Sciuto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach.

Authors:  Vimal K Narula; Dean J Mikami; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.327

View more
  4 in total

1.  Robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy: results from Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Shyr; Shin-E Wang; Bor-Uei Shyr; Bor-Shiuan Shyr; Shih-Chin Chen
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-10-17

2.  First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore.

Authors:  Tze-Yi Low; Ye-Xin Koh; Brian Kp Goh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 3.  Review of emerging surgical robotic technology.

Authors:  Brian S Peters; Priscila R Armijo; Crystal Krause; Songita A Choudhury; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Propensity-Matched Analysis to Open and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  A Floortje van Oosten; Ding Ding; Joseph R Habib; Ahmer Irfan; Ryan K Schmocker; Elisabetta Sereni; Benedict Kinny-Köster; Michael Wright; Vincent P Groot; I Quintus Molenaar; John L Cameron; Martin Makary; Richard A Burkhart; William R Burns; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.