Literature DB >> 29075161

Calvarial Reconstruction.

Arvind Badhey1, Sameep Kadakia2, Moustafa Mourad2, Jared Inman3, Yadranko Ducic2.   

Abstract

Calvarial reconstruction is a challenge to reconstructive surgeons, especially considering protection of intracranial contents. In recent years, the advent of multiple reconstructive materials adds tools to the surgical armamentarium. Options include autologous split calvarial and rib grafts and alloplastic materials such as titanium mesh, methyl methacrylate, calcium hydroxyapatite, and polyetheretherketone. The most important aspect of cranial reconstruction still lies in finding the most aesthetic, safe, and reliable means of filling a defect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autologous cranioplasty; calvarium reconstruction; cranioplasty; hydroxyapatite; methyl methacrylate; synthetic cranioplasty

Year:  2017        PMID: 29075161      PMCID: PMC5656441          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Plast Surg        ISSN: 1535-2188            Impact factor:   2.314


  48 in total

1.  Cranioplasty in prehistoric times.

Authors:  C B COURVILLE
Journal:  Bull Los Angel Neuro Soc       Date:  1959-03

2.  The surgical anatomy of the scalp.

Authors:  D E Tolhurst; M H Carstens; R J Greco; D J Hurwitz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  J P Rubin; M J Yaremchuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  [The history of cranioplasty].

Authors:  J L Durand; D Renier; D Marchac
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 0.660

5.  Cerebrospinal fluid fistula from fractured acrylic cranioplasty plate. Case report.

Authors:  H M Henry; C Guerrero; R A Moody
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  A new technique for cranioplasty with L-shaped titanium plates and combination ceramic implants composed of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate (Ceratite).

Authors:  H Miyake; T Ohta; H Tanaka
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Cranioplasty using acrylic material: a new technical procedure.

Authors:  Luigi Chiarini; Sabina Figurelli; Giuseppe Pollastri; Elio Torcia; Francesca Ferrari; Massimo Albanese; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Long-term experience with methylmethacrylate cranioplasty in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  D Marchac; A Greensmith
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Computer-aided design and manufacture and rapid prototyped polymethylmethacrylate reconstruction.

Authors:  Gürsel Turgut; Özay Özkaya; Mahmut Ulvi Kayali
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Split Rib Cranioplasty for Frontal Osteoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Vaner Koksal; Selim Kayaci; Recep Bedir
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 0.611

View more
  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of Cranioplasty Strategies for High-Risk Complex Cranial Defects: A 10-Year Experience.

Authors:  Edgar Soto; Ryan D Restrepo; John H Grant; René P Myers
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Porous polyetheretherketone microcarriers fabricated via hydroxylation together with cell-derived mineralized extracellular matrix coatings promote cell expansion and bone regeneration.

Authors:  Shuo Sun; Zixue Jiao; Yu Wang; Zhenxu Wu; Haowei Wang; Qingming Ji; Yi Liu; Zongliang Wang; Peibiao Zhang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-03-19

Review 3.  Dental stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles as promising therapeutic agents in the treatment of diseases.

Authors:  Ye Li; Xu Duan; Yinxue Chen; Bingyun Liu; Gang Chen
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.344

4.  Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants.

Authors:  Adam Binhammer; Josie Jakubowski; Oleh Antonyshyn; Paul Binhammer
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

5.  Mesenchymal stem cells and three-dimensional-osteoconductive scaffold regenerate calvarial bone in critical size defects in swine.

Authors:  Zoe M Johnson; Yuan Yuan; Xiangjia Li; Tea Jashashvili; Michael Jamieson; Mark Urata; Yong Chen; Yang Chai
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.940

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.