Literature DB >> 15779066

Maintaining your focus in focus groups: avoiding common mistakes.

Denise Côté-Arsenault1, Dianne Morrison-Beedy.   

Abstract

Focus groups are used frequently in nursing research as a method for collecting qualitative data. However, due to inadequate planning or execution, the results can be of poor quality or even worthless. A well-defined purpose, carefully planned environment, and well trained personnel are discussed as the cornerstones to focus group success. This article sets the stage with a description of a well conducted focus group, then provides examples and a critique of less-than-effective groups. Focus groups can be powerful and effective when their use is appropriate to the study purpose, the environment is non-judgmental and welcoming, and the personnel are skilled.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15779066     DOI: 10.1002/nur.20063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  23 in total

1.  Always, never, or sometimes: examining variation in condom-use decision making among Black adolescent mothers.

Authors:  LaRon E Nelson; Dianne Morrison-Beedy; Margaret H Kearney; Ann Dozier
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  A qualitative study to assess perceptions, barriers, and motivators supporting smokeless tobacco cessation in the US fire service.

Authors:  Nattinee Jitnarin; Walker S C Poston; Sara A Jahnke; Christopher K Haddock; Hannah N Kelley; Herbert H Severson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Youth physical activity opportunities in lower and higher income neighborhoods.

Authors:  Richard Robert Suminski; Ding Ding; Rebecca Lee; Linda May; Tonya Tota; David Dinius
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Coping strategies to manage stress related to vision loss and fluctuations in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Lori Edwards; Maureen George
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2010-06-29

5.  Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods.

Authors:  Michaela Coenen; Tanja A Stamm; Gerold Stucki; Alarcos Cieza
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Understanding sexual abstinence in urban adolescent girls.

Authors:  Dianne Morrison-Beedy; Michael P Carey; Denise Côté-Arsenault; Susan Seibold-Simpson; Kerry Anne Robinson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

7.  Using focus groups to adapt ethnically appropriate, information-seeking and recruitment messages for a prostate cancer screening program for men at high risk.

Authors:  Charlene J Bryan; Lindsay Wetmore-Arkader; Tammy Calvano; Janet A Deatrick; Veda N Giri; Deborah Watkins Bruner
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Black adolescent mothers' perspectives on sex and parenting in nonmarital relationships with the biological fathers of their children.

Authors:  LaRon E Nelson; Dianne Morrison-Beedy; Margaret H Kearney; Ann Dozier
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012-01

9.  An Assessment of a Shortened Consent Form for the Storage and Research Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Spots.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Aaron Goldenberg; Erin Johnson; Naomi Riches; Beth Tarini; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Residual newborn screening samples for research: parental information needs for decision-making.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Lauren Clark; Rebecca Anderson; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Spec Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 1.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.