| Literature DB >> 29073242 |
Mi Sun Sung1, Tae Hee Lee1, Hwan Heo1, Sang Woo Park1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical features of peripapillary microvasculature in myopic eyes and investigate the association between the superficial and deep peripapillary microvascular density and the myopic optic disc characteristics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29073242 PMCID: PMC5658175 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Measurement of deep peripapillary microvascular density in the β-peripapillary atrophy (β-PPA) area.
(A) Boundaries of the optic disc, β-PPA, and overlying superficial large vessels delineated. After excluding the area occupied by overlying superficial large vessels, the β-PPA was divided into 7 areas. The choroidal vessel density of each area was automatically measured using the built-in drawing tool of Avanti OCT software. The average choroidal vessel density of 7 areas was calculated and referred to as deep peripapillary microvascular density. (B-C) Corresponding scanning laser ophthalmoscopy image (B) and fundus photography image (C).
Comparison of subject characteristics according to the myopic degree and optic disc rotation direction.
| Variables | Overall | Degree of myopia | Optic disc rotation direction | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-high myopia | High myopia | p value | Superior | Inferior | p value | ||
| 23.39 ± 3.85 | 23.80 ± 3.66 | 22.62 ± 4.11 | 0.074 | 23.44 ± 3.93 | 23.32 ± 3.78 | 0.851 | |
| 99 / 51 | 64 / 34 | 35 /17 | 0.476 | 55 / 24 | 44 / 27 | 0.389 | |
| -5.34 ± 2.72 | -3.72 ± 1.40 | -8.38 ± 1.83 | -4.96 ± 2.49 | -5.76 ± 2.91 | 0.077 | ||
| 14.87 ± 2.44 | 14.70 ± 2.35 | 15.17 ± 2.61 | 0.265 | 14.38 ± 2.58 | 15.41 ± 2.17 | ||
| 26.05 ± 1.25 | 25.46 ± 0.98 | 27.14 ± 0.96 | 25.96 ± 1.23 | 26.14 ± 1.29 | 0.379 | ||
| 558.21 ± 35.37 | 558.34 ± 37.64 | 557.96 ± 31.01 | 0.951 | 555.72 ± 30.52 | 260.97 ± 40.14 | 0.373 | |
| 1.86 ± 0.40 | 1.88 ± 0.45 | 1.80 ± 0.25 | 0.071 | 1.85 ± 0.33 | 1.87 ± 0.46 | 0.818 | |
| 0.48 ± 0.15 | 0.49 ± 0.16 | 0.45 ± 0.15 | 0.081 | 0.45 ± 0.14 | 0.61 ± 0.17 | 0.061 | |
| 1.31 ± 0.13 | 1.31 ± 0.12 | 1.33 ± 0.14 | 0.340 | 1.31 ± 0.13 | 1.32 ± 0.12 | 0.609 | |
| 1.57 ± 15.60 | -0.31 ± 15.07 | 5.12 ± 16.10 | -11.95 ± 4.66 | 16.62 ± 7.60 | |||
| 0.96 ± 0.42 | 0.90 ± 0.41 | 1.08 ± 0.41 | 0.86 ± 0.37 | 1.07 ± 0.45 | |||
| 98.71 ± 7.97 | 100.95 ± 6.79 | 94.48 ± 8.37 | 99.27 ± 7.09 | 98.08 ± 8.86 | 0.367 | ||
| 55.16 ± 2.40 | 55.74 ± 2.24 | 54.06 ± 2.35 | 55.46 ± 2.08 | 54.82 ± 2.69 | 0.100 | ||
| 47.66 ± 8.13 | 46.85 ± 8.51 | 49.17 ± 7.21 | 0.097 | 48.79 ± 7.99 | 46.39 ± 8.15 | 0.073 | |
| 62.14 ± 5.47 | 63.03 ± 2.56 | 60.49 ± 3.46 | 62.38 ± 2.90 | 61.88 ± 3.39 | 0.336 | ||
| 73.76 ± 4.02 | 73.60 ± 4.22 | 74.05± 3.64 | 0.525 | 75.05± 3.71 | 72.32± 3.89 | ||
SE = spherical equivalent; D = diopters; IOP = intraocular pressure; CDR = cup-to-disc ratio; PPA = peripapillary atrophy; pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; RPC = radial peripapillary capillary.
* Comparisons between the non-high myopia and high myopia groups using an independent-t test or chi-square test as appropriate.
† Comparisons between the superior rotation and inferior rotation groups using an independent-t test or chi-square test as appropriate.
‡ All IOP measurements were made between 4:00 and 6:00 pm.
§ The comparison was done with the unsigned value.
Factors associated with superficial peripapillary microvascular reduction (< 60%) in healthy myopic eyes.
| Variables | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio | 95% CI | p value | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | p value | |
| 0.919 | 0.824–1.025 | 0.130 | ||||
| 0.665 | 0.399–1.334 | 0.204 | ||||
| 1.187 | 1.005–1.400 | 1.214 | 0.980–1.504 | 0.076 | ||
| 3.305 | 2.069–5.280 | 2.756 | 1.600–4.749 | |||
| 0.997 | 0.986–1.008 | 0.566 | ||||
| 0.798 | 0.289–2.199 | 0.662 | ||||
| 0.556 | 0.457–3.521 | 0.407 | ||||
| 1.460 | 1.064–2.003 | 1.100 | 0.725–1.671 | 0.654 | ||
| 1.023 | 0.998–1.049 | 0.068 | 1.001 | 0.968–1.036 | 0.936 | |
| 10.465 | 3.418–32.037 | 3.636 | 0.983–13.449 | 0.053 | ||
| 0.889 | 0.839–0.941 | 0.927 | 0.866–0.992 | |||
| 1.071 | 0.881–1.415 | 0.320 | ||||
| 1.008 | 0.915–1.110 | 0.872 | ||||
CI = confidence interval; IOP = intraocular pressure; CDR = cup-to-disc ratio; PPA = peripapillary atrophy; pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; RPC = radial peripapillary capillary.
* Variables with p < 0.10 in the univariate model were entered in a multivariate model.
Factors associated with deep peripapillary microvascular reduction (< 70%) in healthy myopic eyes.
| Variables | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio | 95% CI | p value | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | p value | |
| 1.072 | 0.964–1.193 | 0.200 | ||||
| 1.034 | 0.425–2.516 | 0.942 | ||||
| 1.168 | 0.977–1.398 | 0.088 | 1.115 | 0.894–1.392 | 0.334 | |
| 0.966 | 0.688–1.356 | 0.842 | ||||
| 1.006 | 0.994–1.018 | 0.313 | ||||
| 2.534 | 0.561–5.242 | 0.210 | ||||
| 15.35 | 0.662–32.67 | 0.312 | ||||
| 1.496 | 1.060–2.111 | 1.664 | 1.058–2.618 | |||
| 1.049 | 1.019–1.080 | 1.041 | 1.006–1.076 | |||
| 3.937 | 1.486–10.428 | 1.653 | 0.487–5.615 | 0.420 | ||
| 0.958 | 0.907–1.011 | 0.116 | ||||
| 0.897 | 0.758–1.063 | 0.210 | ||||
| 0.939 | 0.893–0.987 | 0.919 | 0.863–0.979 | |||
| 0.992 | 0.867–1.135 | 0.907 | ||||
CI = confidence interval; IOP = intraocular pressure; CDR = cup-to-disc ratio; PPA = peripapillary atrophy; pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; RPC = radial peripapillary capillary.
* Variables with p < 0.10 in the univariate model were entered in a multivariate model.
† Because the measurement of whole en face vessel density includes the superficial peripapillary microvascular density, the whole en face vessel density was not incorporated in the multivariate analysis.
Fig 2Scatter plots illustrating the linear correlation between peripapillary microvascular density and ocular parameters.
(A-B) Relationship between the superficial peripapillary microvascular density and axial length (A) and average peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness (B). (C-D) Relationship between the deep peripapillary microvascular density and degree of optic disc rotation (C) and inside disc vessel density (D).
Fig 3Two representative cases of healthy myopic eye with similar degree of axial myopia and different degrees of ovality index and optic disc rotation.
(A) OCT angiography image of 22-year-old man. The signal strength of the image was 76 and the deep peripapillary microvascular density was 79.17%. (B) OCT angiography image of 28-year-old man. He had a larger ovality index and more inferiorly rotated optic disc. The signal strength of the image was 80 and the deep peripapillary microvascular density was 68.55%, which is a deep peripapillary microvascular reduction.