IMPORTANCE: Vascular factors may have important roles in the pathophysiology of glaucoma. A practical method for the clinical evaluation of ocular perfusion is needed to improve glaucoma management. OBJECTIVE: To detect peripapillary retinal perfusion in glaucomatous eyes compared with normal eyes using optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective observational study performed from July 24, 2013, to April 17, 2014. Participants were recruited and tested at Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University. In total, 12 glaucomatous eyes and 12 age-matched normal eyes were analyzed. The optic disc region was imaged twice using a 3 × 3-mm scan by a 70-kHz, 840-nm-wavelength spectral OCT system. The split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography algorithm was used. Peripapillary flow index was calculated as the mean decorrelation value in the peripapillary region, defined as a 700-µm-wide elliptical annulus around the disc. Peripapillary vessel density was the percentage area occupied by vessels. The data statistical analysis was performed from October 30, 2013, to May 30, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Variability was assessed by the coefficient of variation. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the 2 groups of eyes. Correlations between vascular and visual field variables were assessed by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: In 12 normal eyes, a dense microvascular network around the disc was visible on OCT angiography. In 12 glaucomatous eyes, this network was visibly attenuated globally and focally. In normal eyes, between-visit reproducibilities of peripapillary flow index and peripapillary vessel density were 4.3% and 2.7% of the coefficient of variation, respectively, while the population variabilities of peripapillary flow index and peripapillary vessel density were 8.2% and 3.0% of the coefficient of variation, respectively. Peripapillary flow index and peripapillary vessel density in glaucomatous eyes were lower than those in normal eyes (P < .001 for both). Peripapillary flow index (Pearson r = -0.808) and peripapillary vessel density (Pearson r = -0.835) were highly correlated with visual field pattern standard deviation in glaucomatous eyes (P = .001 for both). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for normal vs glaucomatous eyes were 0.892 for peripapillary flow index and 0.938 for peripapillary vessel density. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using OCT angiography, reduced peripapillary retinal perfusion in glaucomatous eyes can be visualized as focal defects and quantified as peripapillary flow index and peripapillary vessel density, with high repeatability and reproducibility. Quantitative OCT angiography may have value in future studies to determine its potential usefulness in glaucoma evaluation.
IMPORTANCE: Vascular factors may have important roles in the pathophysiology of glaucoma. A practical method for the clinical evaluation of ocular perfusion is needed to improve glaucoma management. OBJECTIVE: To detect peripapillary retinal perfusion in glaucomatous eyes compared with normal eyes using optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective observational study performed from July 24, 2013, to April 17, 2014. Participants were recruited and tested at Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University. In total, 12 glaucomatous eyes and 12 age-matched normal eyes were analyzed. The optic disc region was imaged twice using a 3 × 3-mm scan by a 70-kHz, 840-nm-wavelength spectral OCT system. The split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography algorithm was used. Peripapillary flow index was calculated as the mean decorrelation value in the peripapillary region, defined as a 700-µm-wide elliptical annulus around the disc. Peripapillary vessel density was the percentage area occupied by vessels. The data statistical analysis was performed from October 30, 2013, to May 30, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Variability was assessed by the coefficient of variation. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the 2 groups of eyes. Correlations between vascular and visual field variables were assessed by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: In 12 normal eyes, a dense microvascular network around the disc was visible on OCT angiography. In 12 glaucomatous eyes, this network was visibly attenuated globally and focally. In normal eyes, between-visit reproducibilities of peripapillary flow index and peripapillary vessel density were 4.3% and 2.7% of the coefficient of variation, respectively, while the population variabilities of peripapillary flow index and peripapillary vessel density were 8.2% and 3.0% of the coefficient of variation, respectively. Peripapillary flow index and peripapillary vessel density in glaucomatous eyes were lower than those in normal eyes (P < .001 for both). Peripapillary flow index (Pearson r = -0.808) and peripapillary vessel density (Pearson r = -0.835) were highly correlated with visual field pattern standard deviation in glaucomatous eyes (P = .001 for both). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for normal vs glaucomatous eyes were 0.892 for peripapillary flow index and 0.938 for peripapillary vessel density. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Using OCT angiography, reduced peripapillary retinal perfusion in glaucomatous eyes can be visualized as focal defects and quantified as peripapillary flow index and peripapillary vessel density, with high repeatability and reproducibility. Quantitative OCT angiography may have value in future studies to determine its potential usefulness in glaucoma evaluation.
Authors: C P Jonescu-Cuypers; A Harris; R Wilson; L Kagemann; L V Mavroudis; F Topouzis; A L Coleman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Dana Faingold; Chris Hudson; John Flanagan; Kit Guan; Mustafa Rawji; Yvonne M Buys; Graham E Trope Journal: Can J Ophthalmol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 1.882
Authors: Tarek A El Beltagi; Christopher Bowd; Catherine Boden; Payam Amini; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yali Jia; Eric Wei; Xiaogang Wang; Xinbo Zhang; John C Morrison; Mansi Parikh; Lori H Lombardi; Devin M Gattey; Rebecca L Armour; Beth Edmunds; Martin F Kraus; James G Fujimoto; David Huang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Beatriz Abadia; Antonio Ferreras; Pilar Calvo; Mirian Ara; Blanca Ferrandez; Sofia Otin; Paolo Frezzotti; Luis E Pablo; Michele Figus Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: P P Fang; M Lindner; J S Steinberg; P L Müller; M Gliem; P Charbel Issa; T U Krohne; F G Holz Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.059
Authors: Miao Zhang; Jie Wang; Alex D Pechauer; Thomas S Hwang; Simon S Gao; Liang Liu; Li Liu; Steven T Bailey; David J Wilson; David Huang; Yali Jia Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Ryuna Chang; Andrew J Nelson; Vivian LeTran; Brian Vu; Bruce Burkemper; Zhongdi Chu; Ali Fard; Amir H Kashani; Benjamin Y Xu; Ruikang K Wang; Rohit Varma; Grace M Richter Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Linda M Zangwill; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Luke J Saunders; Min Hee Suh; Zhichao Wu; Patricia Isabel C Manalastas; Tadamichi Akagi; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yanin Suwan; Masoud Aghsaei Fard; Lawrence S Geyman; Apichat Tantraworasin; Toco Y Chui; Richard B Rosen; Robert Ritch Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 7.389