Literature DB >> 29070987

Results of Short-Term Follow-Up in BI-RADS 3 and 4a Breast Lesions with a Histological Diagnosis of Fibroadenoma at Percutaneous Needle Biopsy.

Paola Clauser1, Massimo Bazzocchi2, Magda Marcon3, Viviana Londero2, Chiara Zuiani2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of short-term (6 months) follow-up in patients with Breast Imaging Report and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 and 4a lesions, after a diagnosis of fibroadenoma at an image-guided biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of 318 women with 349 biopsy-proven fibroadenomas, a 6-month follow-up, and a follow-up of ≥ 24 months were retrospectively reviewed. Information on clinical history, lesion characteristics on ultrasound (US), mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), BI-RADS classification, and follow-up was collected. The false-negative (FN) rate and the negative predictive value (NPV) for the biopsy were calculated.
RESULTS: 43 patients (13.5%) presented with a palpable nodule; 18 (5.7%) had a history of breast cancer. There were 334 lesions visible on US (95.7%), 57 on US and mammography (16.3%), and 15 on mammography only (4.3%); 37 lesions were first detected on MRI. All lesions were stable at 6 months. After an at least 1-year follow-up, 4 lesions changed their features and were excised. Histology showed 1 invasive lobular cancer, 1 ductal carcinoma in situ, 1 phyllodes tumor, and 1 papilloma. The FN rate of the needle biopsy was 1.1% and the NPV was 98.9%.
CONCLUSION: For lesions initially described as BI-RADS 3 and 4a with a histological diagnosis of fibroadenoma after biopsy, short-term follow-up can be avoided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Breast; Fibroadenoma; Mammography; Ultrasound

Year:  2017        PMID: 29070987      PMCID: PMC5649257          DOI: 10.1159/000477536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  20 in total

1.  Best Practice No 179. Guidelines for breast needle core biopsy handling and reporting in breast screening assessment.

Authors:  I O Ellis; S Humphreys; M Michell; S E Pinder; C A Wells; H D Zakhour
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy?

Authors:  Oswald Graf; Thomas H Helbich; Gottfried Hopf; Claudia Graf; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ arising within a mammary fibroadenoma: a case report.

Authors:  Asako Ooe; Sachiko Takahara; Kazuhiro Sumiyoshi; Hitoshi Yamamoto; Eiichi Shiba; Jun Kawai
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions.

Authors:  Pavel Crystal; Michael Koretz; Semyon Shcharynsky; Victoria Makarov; Selwyn Strano
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.910

Review 5.  Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Ji Young Lee; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?

Authors:  Oswald Graf; Thomas H Helbich; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Gottfried Hopf; Margarita Morgun; Claudia Graf; Reinhold Mallek; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Myoepithelial and epithelial-myoepithelial, mesenchymal and fibroepithelial breast lesions: updates from the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast 2012.

Authors:  Puay Hoon Tan; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Benign and malignant phyllodes tumors: mammographic and sonographic findings.

Authors:  L Liberman; E Bonaccio; D Hamele-Bena; A F Abramson; M A Cohen; D D Dershaw
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  False-negative diagnoses at stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle breast biopsy: long-term follow-up of 1,280 lesions and review of the literature.

Authors:  Roger J Jackman; Francis A Marzoni; Jarrett Rosenberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  A case of a fibroadenoma coexisting with an invasive lobular carcinoma in the breast.

Authors:  Shinya Tajima; Yoshihide Kanemaki; Yasuyuki Kurihara; Kyoko Okamoto; Hiroshi Shimamoto; Hiroko Okazaki; Itsuko Okuda; Futoshi Kawahara; Yasuo Nakajima; Mamoru Fukuda; Ichiro Maeda
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.239

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence of breast fibroadenoma in healthy physical examination population in Guangdong province of China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lijun Zhu; Xiaoqi Zeng; Shanshan Jiang; Simin Ruan; Huanrong Ma; Yingjia Li; Changsheng Ye; Jianyu Dong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Imaging of fibroadenoma: Be careful with imaging follow-up.

Authors:  Bunyamin Ece; Sonay Aydın
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 1.534

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.