Literature DB >> 15674836

Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions.

Pavel Crystal1, Michael Koretz, Semyon Shcharynsky, Victoria Makarov, Selwyn Strano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy (CNB).
METHODS: Sonographically guided 14-gauge CNBs of 715 breast lesions were performed in 652 patients. Histopathologic results were correlated with imaging findings, and repeat biopsy was recommended in the cases of discordance between the radiologic and pathologic results. Long-term follow-up was used for patients with CNB findings of a benign lesion.
RESULTS: Sonographically guided CNB revealed malignancy in 311 lesions (43%). Thirty-one lesions with CNB findings indicating benign conditions underwent additional image-guided or excisional biopsy because of indeterminate pathologic features, disagreement between radiologic and pathologic results, surgeon preference, or patient request. Within these 31 cases, 9 malignancies were diagnosed. The duration of follow-up for the remaining 373 benign lesions varied from 27 to 60 months. In 3 of these 373 cases, carcinoma was diagnosed at the site of CNB. The false-negative rate of 14-gauge sonographically guided CNB was 3.7%, and the sensitivity of sonographically guided CNB for the diagnosis of breast cancer was 96.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Sonographically guided 14-gauge CNB is a safe and accurate method for evaluating breast lesions that require tissue sampling. Radiologic-pathologic correlation and follow-up of benign lesions are essential for a successful breast biopsy program. 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15674836     DOI: 10.1002/jcu.20089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  27 in total

1.  2008 update of the guideline: early detection of breast cancer in Germany.

Authors:  Ute-Susann Albert; Helmut Altland; Volker Duda; Jutta Engel; Max Geraedts; Syvia Heywang-Köbrunner; Dieter Hölzel; Eva Kalbheim; Michael Koller; Klaus König; Rolf Kreienberg; Thorsten Kühn; Annette Lebeau; Irmgard Nass-Griegoleit; Werner Schlake; Rita Schmutzler; Ingrid Schreer; Hilde Schulte; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Uwe Wagner; Ina Kopp
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  G Schueller; C Schueller-Weidekamm; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Comparison of the accuracy of US-guided biopsy of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge automated cutting needle biopsy devices, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Monica L Huang; Kenneth Hess; Rosalind P Candelaria; Mohammad Eghtedari; Beatriz E Adrada; Nour Sneige; Bruno D Fornage
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy.

Authors:  Y J Suh; M J Kim; E-K Kim; H J Moon; J Y Kwak; H R Koo; J H Yoon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses?

Authors:  Eun Jung Lee; Hae Kyoung Jung; Kyung Hee Ko; Jong Tae Lee; Jung Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?

Authors:  Satoko Nakano; Yoshimi Imawari; Akemi Mibu; Masahiko Otsuka; Toshinori Oinuma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Breast cancer detection with short-interval follow-up compared with return to annual screening in patients with benign stereotactic or US-guided breast biopsy results.

Authors:  Jason M Johnson; Alisa K Johnson; Ellen S O'Meara; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Elise N Hotaling; Sally D Herschorn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Investigation of tissue cellularity at the tip of the core biopsy needle with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Nicusor Iftimia; Jesung Park; Gopi Maguluri; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Amanda McWatters; Sharjeel H Sabir
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Can concurrent core biopsy and fine needle aspiration biopsy improve the false negative rate of sonographically detectable breast lesions?

Authors:  Yao-Lung Kuo; Tsai-Wang Chang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.