Literature DB >> 29067584

Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Negar Ahmadi1, Agnes Crnic2, Andrew J Seely3,4, Sudhir R Sundaresan3, P James Villeneuve3,4, Donna E Maziak3, Farid M Shamji3, Sebastien Gilbert5,6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection remains a critical component of esophageal cancer treatment with curative-intent. The aim of this study was to compare open (OE) to minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE) with respect to perioperative and oncologic outcomes.
METHODS: Retrospective single-institution review of MIE and OE patients operated between 2001 and 2015 was conducted. Univariable and multivariable models were created using Cox regression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare oncologic outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare oncological outcomes in MIE and OE patients.
RESULTS: Of 210 esophageal resection patients, 47% had OE (137/291) and 25% had MIE (73/291). The MIE and OE groups were comparable with respect to patient factors and operative details. Fewer OE patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. MIE was associated with improved lymph node yield, (MIE = 30 [IQR:22-39]; OE = 14 [IQR:7-19], p < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (MIE = 312 mL [100-400]; OE = 657 mL [350-700], p < 0.001), and shorter median length of stay (MIE = 10 days [IQR = 8-14]; OE = 14 days [IQR = 11-22] p < 0.01). The OE group had significantly more adverse events resulting in reoperation or intensive care unit admission (MIE = 21%; OE = 34%; p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, age and positive resection margins were associated with decreased odds of survival. The number of lymph nodes retrieved, positive resection margins, and pathologic stage were significant predictors of disease-free survival. Analysis of 69 matched pairs showed equivalent median overall survival (MIE = 49 months [18-67]; OE = 29 months [17-69]; p = 0.26) and disease-free survival (MIE = 9 [6-22]; OE = 13 [6-22]; p = 0.45) between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although long-term oncologic outcomes appear to be similar, MIE is associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss, improved lymph node yield, less risk of severe postoperative adverse events, and shorter length of stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Postoperative adverse events; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29067584     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5881-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Arnold Radtke; Thomas J Musholt; Stephan Timm; Andreas Rink; Achilleas Tsiamis; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Evaluating the reliability and reproducibility of the Ottawa Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality classification system.

Authors:  Jelena Ivanovic; Ahmed Al-Hussaini; Derar Al-Shehab; Jennifer Threader; Patrick James Villeneuve; Tim Ramsay; Donna E Maziak; Sebastian Gilbert; Farid M Shamji; R Sudhir Sundaresan; Andrew J E Seely
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Results of a nation-wide retrospective study of lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroharu Yamashita; Yasuyuki Seto; Takeshi Sano; Hiroyasu Makuuchi; Nobutoshi Ando; Mitsuru Sasako
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; D M Follette; B M Wolfe; P D Schneider; P Roberts; J E Goodnight
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

Review 6.  Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  S J Swanson; P Linden
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection.

Authors:  Rajeev Parameswaran; Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Rakesh Krishnadas; Martin Cooper; Richard Berrisford; Shahjehan Wajed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Jingpei Li; Yaxing Shen; Lijie Tan; Mingxiang Feng; Hao Wang; Yong Xi; Qun Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  3 in total

1.  A perspective on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Composite Score for evaluating esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shuyin Liang; James D Luketich; Inderpal S Sarkaria
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Totally Versus Hybrid Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Min Gu; Han-Lu Zhang; Yu-Shang Yang; Yong Yuan; Yang Hu; Guo-Wei Che; Long-Qi Chen; Wen-Ping Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Early implementation of a perioperative nutrition support pathway for patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Carr; Caitlin Harrington; Christina Stella; Diana Glauner; Erin Kenny; Lianne M Russo; Meghan J Garrity; Manjit S Bains; Smita Sihag; David R Jones; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.