Literature DB >> 29063144

[Grip strength measurement : Significance and boundaries].

P Hahn1, C Spies2, F Unglaub2,3, M Mühldorfer-Fodor4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Grip strength measurement is a widely used method for clinical as well as scientific purposes. In hand surgery, it is an essential component in the diagnosis of disease, treatment sequences and assessment. In epidemiological studies, it is a good predictor of healthy ageing or disease progression. PROBLEM: Measurement results and their interpretation can be influenced by many factors. The historical development of dynamometry, measurement technology and the standard values in various population groups are presented. Comparisons with standard values should only be made using current tables because the grip strength has changed in recent decades. Assessment of the voluntarily submaximal grip strength remains problematic. Proposals are made for how to assess grip strength during the evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease exacerbation; Forensic sciences; Hand; Outcomes assessment; Skeletal muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29063144     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-017-3487-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  27 in total

1.  The coefficient of variation as a measure of sincerity of effort of grip strength, Part II: sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  O Shechtman
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Comparative study of millennials' (age 20-34 years) grip and lateral pinch with the norms.

Authors:  Elizabeth Fain; Cara Weatherford
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  Age- and gender-specific normative data of grip and pinch strength in a healthy adult Swiss population.

Authors:  S Werle; J Goldhahn; S Drerup; B R Simmen; H Sprott; D B Herren
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2009-01-07

4. 

Authors:  Albrecht Hirschmüller
Journal:  NTM       Date:  1997-12

5.  Grip strength and forearm circumference in a healthy population.

Authors:  R E Anakwe; J S Huntley; J E McEachan
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2007-01-02

6.  Sensitivity of the Jamar Dynamometer in detecting submaximal grip effort.

Authors:  R F Ashford; S Nagelburg; R Adkins
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Prevalence of muscle weakness based on different diagnostic criteria in community-dwelling older adults: A comparison of grip strength dynamometers.

Authors:  Miji Kim; Shoji Shinkai
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.730

8.  Grip strength in healthy caucasian adults: reference values.

Authors:  Christian M Günther; Alexander Bürger; Markus Rickert; Alexander Crispin; Christoph U Schulz
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Grip strength testing reliability.

Authors:  A Hamilton; R Balnave; R Adams
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.950

10.  A systematic review of dynamometry and its role in hand trauma assessment.

Authors:  P Mafi; R Mafi; S Hindocha; M Griffin; W Khan
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-02-23
View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of trimodal pre-rehabilitation on the rehabilitation of patients with gastrointestinal tumors in the perioperative period.

Authors:  Qianju Li; Yukun Wang; Tianhao Jin; Liesheng Lu; Yifeng Tong
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Lower grip strength and insufficient physical activity can increase depressive symptoms among middle-aged and older European adults: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Han Zheng; Qingwen He; Hongyan Xu; Xiaowei Zheng; Yanfang Gu
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.070

3.  Use of handgrip strength measurement as an alternative for assessing chewing function in people with dementia.

Authors:  Julia Jockusch; Sebastian Hahnel; Ina Nitschke
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.070

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.