Literature DB >> 17197064

Grip strength and forearm circumference in a healthy population.

R E Anakwe1, J S Huntley, J E McEachan.   

Abstract

Two hundred and fifty subjects were recruited. Age, sex, hand preference and anthropometric measurements were recorded for each subject. Grip strength was measured using a Jamar hydraulic dynamometer. Multiple regression analyses were performed. One hundred and seventy two subjects were men and 78 were women. Twenty-six subjects were left hand dominant. Hand grip strength was greatest for the 35 to 44 year old group for both sexes. Grip strength was consistently greater for men than women. Contralateral grip strength predicted maximum grip strength for both sexes. Forearm circumference predicted maximum hand grip strength for men. Although there was a large range of forearm circumferences in the population, there was little difference between sides for each subject (100% less than 2 cm). The demonstrated relationships between: (i) contralateral grip strengths and (ii) grip strength and forearm circumference lead us to suggest that for certain pathologies, a difference in forearm circumference greater than 2 cm may lend credence to a measurement of diminished grip strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17197064     DOI: 10.1016/J.JHSB.2006.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol        ISSN: 0266-7681


  10 in total

1.  In the company of men: quality of life and social support among the Ariaal of northern Kenya.

Authors:  Benjamin C Campbell; Peter B Gray; Jason Radak
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2011-09

2.  Locked volar plating for complex distal radius fractures: Patient reported outcomes and satisfaction.

Authors:  Re Anakwe; Lak Khan; Re Cook; Je McEachan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 3.  [Grip strength measurement : Significance and boundaries].

Authors:  P Hahn; C Spies; F Unglaub; M Mühldorfer-Fodor
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Comparison of the Grip Strength Using the Martin-Vigorimeter and the JAMAR-Dynamometer: Establishment of Normal Values.

Authors:  Sina Neumann; Sebastian Kwisda; Christian Krettek; Ralph Gaulke
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Hand grip strength determination for healthy males in Saudi Arabia: A study of the relationship with age, body mass index, hand length and forearm circumference using a hand-held dynamometer.

Authors:  Khalid A Alahmari; S Paul Silvian; Ravi Shankar Reddy; Venkata Nagaraj Kakaraparthi; Irshad Ahmad; Mohammad Mahtab Alam
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Hand grip strength: Reference values for adults and elderly people of Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil.

Authors:  Cledir Araújo Amaral; Thatiana Lameira Maciel Amaral; Gina Torres Rego Monteiro; Mauricio Teixeira Leite Vasconcellos; Margareth Crisóstomo Portela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Influences of Neck and/or Wrist Pain on Hand Grip Strength of Industrial Quality Proofing Workers.

Authors:  Bettina Wollesen; Julia Gräf; Nils Schumacher; Gianluca Meyer; Matthias Wanstrath; Christian Feldhaus; Kerstin Luedtke; Klaus Mattes
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2020-07-06

8.  Can We Use Grip Strength to Predict Other Types of Hand Exertions? An Example of Manufacturing Industry Workers.

Authors:  Victor Ei-Wen Lo; Yi-Chen Chiu; Hsin-Hung Tu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Handgrip Strength in Young Adults: Association with Anthropometric Variables and Laterality.

Authors:  Luciana Zaccagni; Stefania Toselli; Barbara Bramanti; Emanuela Gualdi-Russo; Jessica Mongillo; Natascia Rinaldo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Wrist-worn wearables based on force myography: on the significance of user anthropometry.

Authors:  Mona Lisa Delva; Kim Lajoie; Mahta Khoshnam; Carlo Menon
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.