OBJECTIVES: To extend the literature on educational inequalities in cancer screening participation (1) by simultaneously focusing on participation in screening for cervical, breast and colorectal cancer across 27 European countries and (2) by statistically testing whether these educational inequalities vary according to country-specific screening strategies: organised or opportunistic. METHODS: Self-reported data from Eurobarometer 66.2 (2006) on cancer screening participation in the preceding 12 months were used to outline cross-national variations in screening strategies, target populations and participation rates. Multilevel logistic regressions were applied. RESULTS: Individuals with higher levels of education were more likely to participate in screening for cervical, breast and colorectal cancer than were those with less education. Educational inequalities in cancer screening participation were significantly smaller in countries with organised screening for cervical (OR = 0.696, 95% CI 0.531–0.912), breast (OR = 0.628, 95% CI 0.438–0.900) and colorectal (OR = 0.531, 95% CI 0.303–0.932) cancer than they were in countries with opportunistic screening. The same interaction was observed for participation in screening for breast and colorectal cancer, albeit with marginal significance. CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly highlights the crucial role of educational level in the likelihood of participating in cancer screening. Countries can reduce educational inequalities by applying organised screening programmes.
OBJECTIVES: To extend the literature on educational inequalities in cancer screening participation (1) by simultaneously focusing on participation in screening for cervical, breast and colorectal cancer across 27 European countries and (2) by statistically testing whether these educational inequalities vary according to country-specific screening strategies: organised or opportunistic. METHODS: Self-reported data from Eurobarometer 66.2 (2006) on cancer screening participation in the preceding 12 months were used to outline cross-national variations in screening strategies, target populations and participation rates. Multilevel logistic regressions were applied. RESULTS: Individuals with higher levels of education were more likely to participate in screening for cervical, breast and colorectal cancer than were those with less education. Educational inequalities in cancer screening participation were significantly smaller in countries with organised screening for cervical (OR = 0.696, 95% CI 0.531–0.912), breast (OR = 0.628, 95% CI 0.438–0.900) and colorectal (OR = 0.531, 95% CI 0.303–0.932) cancer than they were in countries with opportunistic screening. The same interaction was observed for participation in screening for breast and colorectal cancer, albeit with marginal significance. CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly highlights the crucial role of educational level in the likelihood of participating in cancer screening. Countries can reduce educational inequalities by applying organised screening programmes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer screening participation; Cancer screening strategy; Comparative health research; Educational inequalities; Europe
Authors: J Ferlay; E Steliarova-Foucher; J Lortet-Tieulent; S Rosso; J W W Coebergh; H Comber; D Forman; F Bray Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Sue E Kim; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Sabrina Wong; Steve Gregorich; George F Sawaya; Judith M E Walsh; Celia P Kaplan Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-04-14
Authors: Rachel Broadbent; Louise Gorman; Christopher J Armitage; John Radford; Kim Linton Journal: Health Expect Date: 2021-11-09 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Esther E Idehen; Anni Virtanen; Eero Lilja; Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen; Tellervo Korhonen; Päivikki Koponen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Vladimir Jolidon; Vincent De Prez; Barbara Willems; Piet Bracke; Stéphane Cullati; Claudine Burton-Jeangros Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 3.295