Literature DB >> 33506704

A Latent Disease Model to Reduce Detection Bias in Cancer Risk Prediction Studies.

Serge Aleshin-Guendel1, Jane Lange2, Phyllis Goodman3, Noel S Weiss2,4, Ruth Etzioni1,2.   

Abstract

In studies of cancer risk, detection bias arises when risk factors are associated with screening patterns, affecting the likelihood and timing of diagnosis. To eliminate detection bias in a screened cohort, we propose modeling the latent onset of cancer and estimating the association between risk factors and onset rather than diagnosis. We apply this framework to estimate the increase in prostate cancer risk associated with black race and family history using data from the SELECT prostate cancer prevention trial, in which men were screened and biopsied according to community practices. A positive family history was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of prostate cancer onset of 1.8, lower than the corresponding HR of prostate cancer diagnosis (HR = 2.2). This result comports with a finding that men in SELECT with a family history were more likely to be biopsied following a positive PSA test than men with no family history. For black race, the HRs for onset and diagnosis were similar, consistent with similar patterns of screening and biopsy by race. If individual screening and diagnosis histories are available, latent disease modeling can be used to decouple risk of disease from risk of disease diagnosis and reduce detection bias.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening; detection bias; disease surveillance; latent model; risk prediction

Year:  2021        PMID: 33506704      PMCID: PMC8279086          DOI: 10.1177/0163278720984203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  24 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology and pathophysiology of prostate cancer in African-American men.

Authors:  Isaac J Powell
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Colorectal cancer predicted risk online (CRC-PRO) calculator using data from the multi-ethnic cohort study.

Authors:  Brian J Wells; Michael W Kattan; Gregory S Cooper; Leila Jackson; Siran Koroukian
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  A re-analysis of a randomized clinical trial for gastric cancer using interval censoring.

Authors:  J Sakamoto; S Teramukai; H Nakazato; Y Ohashi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Chen Chi; M Scott Lucia; Phyllis J Goodman; John J Crowley; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Analysis of doubly-censored survival data, with application to AIDS.

Authors:  V De Gruttola; S W Lagakos
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Biases in Recommendations for and Acceptance of Prostate Biopsy Significantly Affect Assessment of Prostate Cancer Risk Factors: Results From Two Large Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; Cathee Till; Jeannette M Schenk; M Scott Lucia; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Laura Ichikawa; William E Barlow; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Alternative analytic methods for case-control studies of estrogens and endometrial cancer.

Authors:  R I Horwitz; A R Feinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Misclassification of outcome in case-control studies: Methods for sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Gilbert; Richard M Martin; Jenny Donovan; J Athene Lane; Freddie Hamdy; David E Neal; Chris Metcalfe
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.

Authors:  Shaneda Warren Andersen; William J Blot; Loren Lipworth; Mark Steinwandel; Harvey J Murff; Wei Zheng
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.