Literature DB >> 21420755

The importance of socio-economic variables in cancer screening participation: a comparison between population-based and opportunistic screening in the EU-15.

Brendan Walsh1, Mary Silles, Ciarán O'Neill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in participation with breast and cervical cancer screening related to individual socio-economic characteristics, across population-based versus opportunistic screening programmes.
METHODS: Data from Eurobarometer 66.2 "Health in the European Union" 2006 on self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening participation in the preceding 12 months within the EU 15 was obtained The sample was restricted to those eligible for screening based on the screening age within each country. Observations for 2214 and 5025 individuals respectively for breast and cervical cancer screening were available. Data on marital status, self-reported health, socio-economic group and years of education were also available. Screening programmes were categorised as population-based or opportunistic and logistic regression analysis used to examine the relationship between participation, individual characteristics and programme type.
RESULTS: Differences in participation related to socio-economic status were observed in opportunistic screening programmes for breast cancer (OR=0.63* and OR=0.51**) and cervical cancer (OR=0.75** and OR=0.64**). Differences related to socio-economic characteristics were not found with respect to participation in population-based programmes.
CONCLUSIONS: In opportunistic programmes, differences in participation across socio-economic groups are evident in respect of both breast and cervical cancer screening. These differences may have implications for treatment and outcomes across socio-economic groups. Such differences were not evident in population-based programmes.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21420755     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  13 in total

1.  Colonoscopy in Germany-Important Steps Towards a National Screening Program.

Authors:  Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Age differences in mammography screening reconsidered: life course trajectories in 13 European countries.

Authors:  Sarah Missinne; Piet Bracke
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  The education gradient in cancer screening participation: a consistent phenomenon across Europe?

Authors:  Barbara Willems; Piet Bracke
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Comparison of patients diagnosed with gonorrhoea through community screening with those self-presenting to the genitourinary medicine clinic.

Authors:  Penny A Cook; John Evans-Jones; Harry Mallinson; Martyn Wood; Fath Alloba; Kathy Jones; Sara Strodtbeck; Layla Hanna-Bashara
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Cervical cancer screening in Switzerland: cross-sectional trends (1992-2012) in social inequalities.

Authors:  Claudine Burton-Jeangros; Stéphane Cullati; Orly Manor; Delphine S Courvoisier; Christine Bouchardy; Idris Guessous
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  Health beliefs, illness perceptions and determinants of breast screening uptake in Malta: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Danika Marmarà; Vincent Marmarà; Gill Hubbard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Ethical Hurdles in the Prioritization of Oncology Care.

Authors:  Folkert de Groot; Stefano Capri; Jean-Claude Castanier; David Cunningham; Bruno Flamion; Mathias Flume; Harald Herholz; Lars-Åke Levin; Oriol Solà-Morales; Christoph J Rupprecht; Natalie Shalet; Andrew Walker; Olivier Wong
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.561

8.  Macro-contextual determinants of cancer screening participation and inequalities: A multilevel analysis of 29 European countries.

Authors:  Vladimir Jolidon; Piet Bracke; Claudine Burton-Jeangros
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-05-28

9.  Obstacles to the uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings: what remains to be achieved by French national programmes?

Authors:  Jonathan Sicsic; Carine Franc
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening.

Authors:  Monika Eichholzer; Aline Richard; Sabine Rohrmann; Seraina M Schmid; Cornelia Leo; Dorothy J Huang; Uwe Güth
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.