Introduction: The US cigar market is diverse, yet until recently most research studies and tobacco surveillance systems have not reported behavioral and related outcomes by cigar type. Methods: The 2013-2014 Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study collected data separately for filtered cigars (FCs), cigarillos, and traditional cigars, which were further distinguished as premium or nonpremium. Descriptive statistics for adult established current smokers of each cigar type and cigarettes were calculated for demographic characteristics, tobacco use patterns, purchasing behaviors and reasons for use. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) using a marginal predictions approach with logistic regression assessed correlates of dual cigar and cigarette smoking. Results: Age, sex, race/ethnicity, education level, and poverty status of smokers varied according to cigar type. Daily cigar smoking prevalence and number of cigars smoked per day were higher for FCs (37.3%; median: 1.6 cigars/day, respectively), than all other cigar types (6.7%-25.3%, all p < .01; 0.1-0.4 cigars/day, all p < .01, respectively); daily smoking and cigars per day were similar for nonpremium cigars and cigarillos (p = .11; p = .33, respectively). Cigarette smoking was twice as common among smokers of nonpremium cigars, cigarillos, and FCs (58.0%-66.0%) than among premium cigars (29.9%). Among current cigar smokers, FC smokers (APR = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.39), other tobacco product users (APR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.15-1.41), and those with a GED/high school diploma or less (APR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.09-1.33) were more likely to also smoke cigarettes. Conclusion: User characteristics, cigar smoking patterns, and dual smoking with cigarettes varied by cigar type highlighting the importance of adequately describing the cigar type studied and, where appropriate, differentiating results by cigar type. Implications: Despite the diversity of the cigar market place, historically many research studies and tobacco surveillance systems have treated cigars as a single product type. This study describes similarities and differences in the user characteristics, tobacco use patterns, and purchasing behaviors of premium, nonpremium, cigarillo, and filtered cigar smokers. To enhance tobacco regulatory science, sufficient descriptions of the cigar type(s) studied and, where appropriate, differentiation of the particular cigar type(s) studied should be undertaken to improve the interpretation of study findings, understanding of cigar use patterns and related behaviors and future approaches to reducing cigar-attributable morbidity and mortality.
Introduction: The US cigar market is diverse, yet until recently most research studies and tobacco surveillance systems have not reported behavioral and related outcomes by cigar type. Methods: The 2013-2014 Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study collected data separately for filtered cigars (FCs), cigarillos, and traditional cigars, which were further distinguished as premium or nonpremium. Descriptive statistics for adult established current smokers of each cigar type and cigarettes were calculated for demographic characteristics, tobacco use patterns, purchasing behaviors and reasons for use. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) using a marginal predictions approach with logistic regression assessed correlates of dual cigar and cigarette smoking. Results: Age, sex, race/ethnicity, education level, and poverty status of smokers varied according to cigar type. Daily cigar smoking prevalence and number of cigars smoked per day were higher for FCs (37.3%; median: 1.6 cigars/day, respectively), than all other cigar types (6.7%-25.3%, all p < .01; 0.1-0.4 cigars/day, all p < .01, respectively); daily smoking and cigars per day were similar for nonpremium cigars and cigarillos (p = .11; p = .33, respectively). Cigarette smoking was twice as common among smokers of nonpremium cigars, cigarillos, and FCs (58.0%-66.0%) than among premium cigars (29.9%). Among current cigar smokers, FC smokers (APR = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.39), other tobacco product users (APR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.15-1.41), and those with a GED/high school diploma or less (APR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.09-1.33) were more likely to also smoke cigarettes. Conclusion: User characteristics, cigar smoking patterns, and dual smoking with cigarettes varied by cigar type highlighting the importance of adequately describing the cigar type studied and, where appropriate, differentiating results by cigar type. Implications: Despite the diversity of the cigar market place, historically many research studies and tobacco surveillance systems have treated cigars as a single product type. This study describes similarities and differences in the user characteristics, tobacco use patterns, and purchasing behaviors of premium, nonpremium, cigarillo, and filtered cigar smokers. To enhance tobacco regulatory science, sufficient descriptions of the cigar type(s) studied and, where appropriate, differentiation of the particular cigar type(s) studied should be undertaken to improve the interpretation of study findings, understanding of cigar use patterns and related behaviors and future approaches to reducing cigar-attributable morbidity and mortality.
Authors: Rosalie V Caruso; Richard J O'Connor; Mark J Travers; Cristine D Delnevo; W Edryd Stephens Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jennifer Cullen; Paul Mowery; Cristine Delnevo; Jane A Allen; Natasha Sokol; M Justin Byron; Amber Thornton-Bullock Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cristine D Delnevo; Mary Hrywna; Daniel P Giovenco; Erin J Miller Lo; Richard J O'Connor Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Kathryn C Edwards; Eva Sharma; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Karin A Kasza; Hannah Day; Hoda T Hammad; Gabriella Anic; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jean Limpert; Lisa D Gardner; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland; Cassandra A Stanton Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Cindy M Chang; Brian L Rostron; Joanne T Chang; Catherine G Corey; Heather L Kimmel; Connie S Sosnoff; Maciej L Goniewicz; Kathryn C Edwards; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Yuesong Wang; Arseima Y Del Valle-Pinero; Maocheng Yang; Mark J Travers; Stephen Arnstein; Kristie Taylor; Kevin Conway; Bridget K Ambrose; Nicolette Borek; Andrew Hyland; Lanqing Wang; Benjamin C Blount; Dana M van Bemmel Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Andrea H Weinberger; Cristine D Delnevo; Jiaqi Zhu; Misato Gbedemah; Joun Lee; Lisa N Cruz; Rachel S Kashan; Renee D Goodwin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Liane M Schneller; Dongmei Li; Zahíra Quiñones Tavárez; Maciej L Goniewicz; Amanda J Quisenberry; Zidian Xie; Irfan Rahman; Scott McIntosh; Richard J O'Connor; Deborah J Ossip Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2020-09-01
Authors: Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Jessica L King; Allison J Lazard; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin; Desmond Jenson; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jennifer W Tidey; Danielle R Davis; Mollie E Miller; Irene Pericot-Valverde; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Diann E Gaalema Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Kathleen R Case; MeLisa R Creamer; Maria R Cooper; Alexandra Loukas; Cheryl L Perry Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-06-30 Impact factor: 3.913