Literature DB >> 32766683

Developing Pictorial Cigarillo Warnings: Insights From Focus Groups.

Jennifer Cornacchione Ross1, Jessica L King2, Allison J Lazard3,4, Seth M Noar3,4, Beth A Reboussin5, Desmond Jenson6, Erin L Sutfin1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) selected six text-only warnings for cigarillos to be implemented on packaging and advertising. Pictorial warnings are more effective at discouraging cigarette use than text-only warnings, yet no research exists for cigarillos. We sought to understand what types of images might be most effectively paired with the cigarillo text warnings to inform broad principles for developing pictorial warnings, with a focus on young adults, who have the highest rate of cigarillo use.
METHODS: We conducted five focus groups with a total of N = 30 young adult cigarillo users and susceptible nonusers (53% female, 50% White, and 33% Black). Participants were shown four to eight unique images for each of the six text statements and were asked about visual-verbal congruency, emotional and cognitive reactions, and perceived effectiveness of each image. Sessions were recorded and transcribed; two investigators independently coded transcripts for emergent themes.
RESULTS: Participants reported images that were graphic or "gross" would best grab attention and discourage use of cigarillos. Participants preferred images that were a direct illustration of the information in the warning text, rather than abstract images that required more cognitive effort to understand. Participants also highlighted that including people in the images, especially youth and young adults making eye contact, helped them relate to the warnings, garner their attention, and positively influence their reactions.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified several principles to inform the selection of images to pair with the FDA-required cigarillo text statements. These insights may also apply to pictorial warnings for other tobacco products. IMPLICATIONS: This focus group study identified principles for selecting images to develop pictorial warnings for the six FDA text-only cigarillo warnings. We found that young adult cigarillo users and susceptible nonusers preferred images that were graphic and gross, believable, congruent to the warning text, and included people. Images that match young adults' visual expectations of a disease and are emotion-provoking may be most effective in pictorial warnings and highlight challenges for developing pictorial warnings for health effects that do not have a visible health consequence.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32766683      PMCID: PMC7822103          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  37 in total

1.  Patterns and correlates of the co-use of marijuana with any tobacco and individual tobacco products in young adults from Wave 2 of the PATH Study.

Authors:  Amy M Cohn; Haneen Abudayyeh; Lexie Perreras; Erica N Peters
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  The Most Natural Tobacco Used: A Qualitative Investigation of Young Adult Smokers' Risk Perceptions of Flavored Little Cigars and Cigarillos.

Authors:  Kymberle L Sterling; Craig S Fryer; Pebbles Fagan
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings among Mexican youth and adults: a population-level intervention with potential to reduce tobacco-related inequities.

Authors:  David Hammond; James Thrasher; Jessica L Reid; Pete Driezen; Christian Boudreau; Edna Arillo Santillán
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  College student reactions to health warning labels: sociodemographic and psychosocial factors related to perceived effectiveness of different approaches.

Authors:  Carla J Berg; James F Thrasher; J Lee Westmaas; Taneisha Buchanan; Erika A Pinsker; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Some Risk Appraisals But Not Risk Beliefs: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Jacob A Rohde; Joshua O Barker; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Hum Commun Res       Date:  2020-02-03

6.  Deeming Tobacco Products To Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as Amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; Restrictions on the Sale and Distribution of Tobacco Products and Required Warning Statements for Tobacco Products. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2016-05-10

7.  Cigarillo and Little Cigar Mainstream Smoke Constituents from Replicated Human Smoking.

Authors:  Wallace B Pickworth; Zachary R Rosenberry; Daniel Yi; Emily N Pitts; Wilhelmina Lord-Adem; Bartosz Koszowski
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  Association of Cigarette, Cigar, and Pipe Use With Mortality Risk in the US Population.

Authors:  Carol H Christensen; Brian Rostron; Candace Cosgrove; Sean F Altekruse; Anne M Hartman; James T Gibson; Benjamin Apelberg; Maki Inoue-Choi; Neal D Freedman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  US Adult Cigar Smoking Patterns, Purchasing Behaviors, and Reasons for Use According to Cigar Type: Findings From the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Catherine G Corey; Enver Holder-Hayes; Anh B Nguyen; Cristine D Delnevo; Brian L Rostron; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Heather L Kimmel; Amber Koblitz; Elizabeth Lambert; Jennifer L Pearson; Eva Sharma; Cindy Tworek; Andrew J Hyland; Kevin P Conway; Bridget K Ambrose; Nicolette Borek
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Emotion in the Law and the Lab: The Case of Graphic Cigarette Warnings.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Abigail T Evans; Natalie Hemmerich; Micah Berman
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Young adults' cigarillo risk perceptions, attention to warning labels and perceptions of proposed pictorial warnings: a focus group study.

Authors:  Stefanie K Gratale; Michelle Jeong; Anupreet Sidhu; Zeinab Safi; Andrew A Strasser; Cristine D Delnevo; Olivia A Wackowski
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Responses to pictorial versus text-only cigarillo warnings among a nationally representative sample of US young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Allison J Lazard; Jessica L King; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin; Desmond Jenson; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Experts' Perceptions of and Suggestions for Cigar Warning Label Messages and Pictorials.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Michelle Jeong; Kevin R J Schroth; Mariam Rashid; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Country Participation in the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Health Warnings Database.

Authors:  Christopher M Seitz; Kenneth D Ward; Zubair Kabir
Journal:  Tob Use Insights       Date:  2021-12-03

5.  Cigar Warning Noticing and Demographic and Usage Correlates: Analysis from the United States Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, Wave 5.

Authors:  Stefanie K Gratale; Arjun Teotia; Julia Chen-Sankey; Ollie Ganz; Cristine D Delnevo; Andrew A Strasser; Olivia A Wackowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.