Literature DB >> 29059352

Believability of Cigarette Warnings About Addiction: National Experiments of Adolescents and Adults.

Allison J Lazard1, Sarah D Kowitt2, Li-Ling Huang3, Seth M Noar1,3, Kristen L Jarman3, Adam O Goldstein3,4.   

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted two experiments to examine the believability of three addiction-focused cigarette warnings and the influence of message source on believability among adolescents and adults in the United States.
Methods: Experimental data were collected using national phone surveys of adolescents (age 13-17; n = 1125; response rate, 66%) and adults (age 18+; n = 5014; response rate, 42%). We assessed the believability of three cigarette warnings about addiction attributed to four message sources (Food and Drug Administration [FDA], Surgeon General, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], no source).
Results: The majority of adolescents and adults reported the three cigarette warnings were very believable (49%-81% for adolescents; 47%-76% for adults). We found four to five times higher odds of adolescents believing a warning that cigarettes are addictive (warning 1) or that nicotine was an addictive chemical (warning 2) compared to a warning that differentiated the addictive risks of menthol versus traditional cigarettes (warning 3), warning 1 adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 4.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.10, 6.63; warning 2 aOR: 3.87, 95% CI: 2.70, 5.50. Similarly, we found three to five times higher odds of adults (including current smokers) believing the same warnings, warning 1 aOR: 3.74, 95% CI: 2.82, 4.95; warning 2 aOR: 3.24, 95% CI: 2.45, 4.28. Message source had no overall impact on the believability of warnings for either population. Conclusions: Our findings support the implementation of FDA's required warnings that cigarettes are addictive and that nicotine is an addictive chemical. These believable warnings may deter adolescents from initiating smoking and encourage adults to quit smoking. Implications: This article describes, for the first time, the believability of different cigarette warnings about addiction. We now know that the majority of adolescents and adults believe cigarette warnings that highlight cigarettes as addictive and that nicotine is an addictive chemical in tobacco. However, a warning that highlighted the relative risk of addiction for menthol cigarettes compared to traditional cigarettes was not as believable among either population. Our findings support the implementation of FDA's required warnings that cigarettes are addictive and that nicotine is an addictive chemical that may deter adolescents from initiating smoking and encourage adults to quit smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29059352      PMCID: PMC5991197          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  36 in total

1.  The marketing of menthol cigarettes in the United States: populations, messages, and channels.

Authors:  Charyn D Sutton; Robert G Robinson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Analysis of legal and scientific issues in court challenges to graphic tobacco warnings.

Authors:  John D Kraemer; Sabeeh A Baig
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Mass media campaigns designed to support new pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets: evidence of a complementary relationship.

Authors:  Emily Brennan; Sarah J Durkin; Trish Cotter; Todd Harper; Melanie A Wakefield
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Reactions to graphic health warnings in the United States.

Authors:  James M Nonnemaker; Conrad J Choiniere; Matthew C Farrelly; Kian Kamyab; Kevin C Davis
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-06-27

Review 5.  The role of menthol in cigarettes as a reinforcer of smoking behavior.

Authors:  Karen Ahijevych; Bridgette E Garrett
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Adolescents' response to text-only tobacco health warnings: results from the 2008 UK Youth Tobacco Policy Survey.

Authors:  Crawford Moodie; Anne Marie MacKintosh; Dave Hammond
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  Graphic imagery is not sufficient for increased attention to cigarette warnings: the role of text captions.

Authors:  Kyle G Brown; John G Reidy; Anna R Weighall; Madelynne A Arden
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 8.  The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.

Authors:  Seth M Noar; Diane B Francis; Christy Bridges; Jennah M Sontag; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Tobacco product use among adults--United States, 2012-2013.

Authors:  Israel T Agaku; Brian A King; Corinne G Husten; Rebecca Bunnell; Bridget K Ambrose; S Sean Hu; Enver Holder-Hayes; Hannah R Day
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Research on Youth and Young Adult Tobacco Use, 2013-2018, From the Food and Drug Administration-National Institutes of Health Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science.

Authors:  Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness: Validation of a Brief Scale.

Authors:  Sabeeh A Baig; Seth M Noar; Nisha C Gottfredson; Marcella H Boynton; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-07-17

3.  Reactions to graphic and text health warnings for cigarettes, sugar-sweetened beverages, and alcohol: An online randomized experiment of US adults.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Anna H Grummon; Allison J Lazard; Olivia M Maynard; Lindsey Smith Taillie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Impact of pictorial health warning labels on smoking beliefs and perceptions among waterpipe smokers: an online randomised cross-over experimental study.

Authors:  Rime Jebai; Taghrid Asfar; Rima Nakkash; Sara Chehab; Wensong Wu; Zoran Bursac; Wasim Maziak
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.953

5.  Cigarette Constituent Health Communications for Smokers: Impact of Chemical, Imagery, and Source.

Authors:  Sarah D Kowitt; Paschal Sheeran; Kristen L Jarman; Leah M Ranney; Allison M Schmidt; Seth M Noar; Li-Ling Huang; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Should Graphic Warning Labels Proposed for Cigarette Packages Sold in the United States Mention the Food and Drug Administration?

Authors:  Mia Jovanova; Chris Skurka; Sahara Byrne; Motasem Kalaji; Amelia Greiner Safi; Norman Porticella; Alan D Mathios; Rosemary J Avery; Michael C Dorf; Jeff Niederdeppe
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Do Smokers Recall Source or Quitline on Cigarette Constituent Messages?

Authors:  Kristen L Jarman; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Leah M Ranney; KyungSu Kim; Ellen E Jones; Emily Donovan; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-11

8.  Are Some of the Cigar Warnings Mandated in the U.S. More Believable Than Others?

Authors:  Kristen L Jarman; Sarah D Kowitt; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Impact of e-cigarette health warnings on motivation to vape and smoke.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Michelle Jeong; Marissa G Hall; Sabeeh A Baig; Jennifer R Mendel; Allison J Lazard; Seth M Noar; Madeline R Kameny; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 10.  A review of tobacco abuse and its epidemiological consequences.

Authors:  Micah O Omare; Joshua K Kibet; Jackson K Cherutoi; Fredrick O Kengara
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2021-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.