Sarah D Kowitt1, Paschal Sheeran2, Kristen L Jarman3, Leah M Ranney4, Allison M Schmidt1, Seth M Noar3,5, Li-Ling Huang3, Adam O Goldstein3,4. 1. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 2. Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 5. School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Communication campaigns are incorporating tobacco constituent messaging to reach smokers, yet there is a dearth of research on how such messages should be constructed or will be received by smokers. METHODS: In a 2 × 2 × 2 experiment, we manipulated three cigarette constituent message components: (1) the toxic constituent of tobacco (arsenic vs. lead) with a corresponding health effect, (2) the presence or absence of an evocative image, and (3) the source of the message (FDA vs. no source). We recruited smokers (N = 1669, 55.4% women) via an online platform and randomized them to one of the eight message conditions. Participants viewed the message and rated its believability and perceived effectiveness, the credibility of the message source, and action expectancies (ie, likelihood of seeking additional information and help with quitting as a result of seeing the message). RESULTS: We found significant main effects of image, constituent, and source on outcomes. The use of arsenic as the constituent, the presence of an evocative image, and the FDA as the source increased the believability, source credibility, and perceived effectiveness of the tobacco constituent health message. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple elements of a constituent message, including type of constituent, imagery, and message source, impact their reception among smokers. Specifically, communication campaigns targeting smokers that utilize arsenic as the tobacco constituent, visual imagery, and the FDA logo may be particularly effective in changing key outcomes that are associated with subsequent attitude and behavioral changes. IMPLICATIONS: This article describes how components of communication campaigns about cigarette constituents are perceived. Multiple elements of a tobacco constituent message, including type of constituent, image, and message source may influence the reception of messages among current smokers. Communication campaigns targeting smokers that utilize arsenic as the tobacco constituent, visual imagery, and the FDA logo may be particularly effective in changing key outcomes among smokers. The effects of such campaigns should be examined, as well as the mechanisms through which such campaigns affect change.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Communication campaigns are incorporating tobacco constituent messaging to reach smokers, yet there is a dearth of research on how such messages should be constructed or will be received by smokers. METHODS: In a 2 × 2 × 2 experiment, we manipulated three cigarette constituent message components: (1) the toxic constituent of tobacco (arsenic vs. lead) with a corresponding health effect, (2) the presence or absence of an evocative image, and (3) the source of the message (FDA vs. no source). We recruited smokers (N = 1669, 55.4% women) via an online platform and randomized them to one of the eight message conditions. Participants viewed the message and rated its believability and perceived effectiveness, the credibility of the message source, and action expectancies (ie, likelihood of seeking additional information and help with quitting as a result of seeing the message). RESULTS: We found significant main effects of image, constituent, and source on outcomes. The use of arsenic as the constituent, the presence of an evocative image, and the FDA as the source increased the believability, source credibility, and perceived effectiveness of the tobacco constituent health message. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple elements of a constituent message, including type of constituent, imagery, and message source, impact their reception among smokers. Specifically, communication campaigns targeting smokers that utilize arsenic as the tobacco constituent, visual imagery, and the FDA logo may be particularly effective in changing key outcomes that are associated with subsequent attitude and behavioral changes. IMPLICATIONS: This article describes how components of communication campaigns about cigarette constituents are perceived. Multiple elements of a tobacco constituent message, including type of constituent, image, and message source may influence the reception of messages among current smokers. Communication campaigns targeting smokers that utilize arsenic as the tobacco constituent, visual imagery, and the FDA logo may be particularly effective in changing key outcomes among smokers. The effects of such campaigns should be examined, as well as the mechanisms through which such campaigns affect change.
Authors: Seth M Noar; Diane B Francis; Christy Bridges; Jennah M Sontag; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Jennifer Cantrell; Donna M Vallone; James F Thrasher; Rebekah H Nagler; Shari P Feirman; Larry R Muenz; David Y He; Kasisomayajula Viswanath Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Darren Mays; Andrea C Johnson; Lilianna Phan; Kenneth P Tercyak; Kathryn Rehberg; Isaac Lipkus Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med Date: 2020-02-20
Authors: Mia Jovanova; Chris Skurka; Sahara Byrne; Motasem Kalaji; Amelia Greiner Safi; Norman Porticella; Alan D Mathios; Rosemary J Avery; Michael C Dorf; Jeff Niederdeppe Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kristen L Jarman; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Leah M Ranney; KyungSu Kim; Ellen E Jones; Emily Donovan; Adam O Goldstein Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2018-11
Authors: Elizabeth G Klein; Amanda J Quisenberry; Abigail B Shoben; Tiffany Thomson; SuSandi Htut; Randi E Foraker; Albert M Lai; Michael D Slater Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2018-11
Authors: Noel T Brewer; Michelle Jeong; Jennifer R Mendel; Marissa G Hall; Dongyu Zhang; Humberto Parada; Marcella H Boynton; Seth M Noar; Sabeeh A Baig; Jennifer C Morgan; Kurt M Ribisl Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Leah M Ranney; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Kristen L Jarman; Adam O Goldstein Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Adam O Goldstein; Kristen L Jarman; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Kyung Su Kim; Bonnie E Shook-Sa; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Leah M Ranney Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-02-01
Authors: Lilianna Phan; Andrea C Villanti; Glenn Leshner; Theodore L Wagener; Elise M Stevens; Andrea C Johnson; Darren Mays Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 4.614