| Literature DB >> 29057949 |
L Cheynel1, J-F Lemaître2, J-M Gaillard2, B Rey2, G Bourgoin2,3, H Ferté4, M Jégo2, F Débias2, M Pellerin5, L Jacob2, E Gilot-Fromont2,3.
Abstract
In animals, physiological mechanisms underlying reproductive and actuarial senescence remain poorly understood. Immunosenescence, the decline in the ability to display an efficient immune response with increasing age, is likely to influence both reproductive and actuarial senescence through increased risk of disease. Evidence for such a link has been reported from laboratory animal models but has been poorly investigated in the wild, where variation in resource acquisitions usually drives life-history trade-offs. We investigated immunosenescence patterns over 7 years in both sexes of two contrasting roe deer populations (Capreolus capreolus). We first measured twelve immune markers to obtain a thorough identification of innate and adaptive components of immunity and assessed, from the same individuals, the age-dependent variation observed in parasitic infections. Although the level of innate traits was maintained at old age, the functional innate immune traits declined with increasing age in one of two populations. In both populations, the production of inflammatory markers increased with advancing age. Finally, the adaptive response declined in late adulthood. The increasing parasite burden with age we reported suggests the effective existence of immunosenescence. Age-specific patterns differed between populations but not between sexes, which indicate that habitat quality could shape age-dependent immune phenotype in the wild.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29057949 PMCID: PMC5651810 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13686-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Linear mixed effect models selected for 12 immune parameters.
| Immune trait | Best model selected | Age function | Variable | Parameter estimate ± SE | t-value | p | R2m | R2c | Predicted value at two years | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ♂ TF | ♀ TF | ♂ CH | ♀ CH | |||||||||
| INNATE TRAITS | ||||||||||||
| Neutrophil count | I(age^2)*sex + pop | quadratic | Intercept | 6.00 ± 0.25 | 23.97 | *** | 0.09 | 0.51 | 6.25 ± 0.29 | 6.52 ± 0.15 | 5.34 ± 0.34 | 5.14 ± 0.18 |
| I(age^2) | 0.01 ± 0.003 | 3.97 | *** | |||||||||
| Sex (M) | 0.57 ± 0.29 | 1.96 | — | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | −1.16 ± 0.22 | −5.15 | *** | |||||||||
| I(age^2): sex (M) | −0.02 ± 0.01 | −3.69 | *** | |||||||||
| Monocyte count | Constant | — | Intercept | 0.29 ± 0.09 | 3.12 | — | 0.00 | 0.46 | 0.30 ± 0.10 | 0.31 ± 0.10 | 0.29 ± 0.07 | 0.30 ± 0.10 |
| Basophil count | Constant | — | Intercept | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 4.33 | — | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
| Eosinophil count | Sex | — | Intercept | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 10.03 | *** | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
| Sex (M) | −0.03 ± 0.01 | −2.90 | ** | |||||||||
| Hemagglutination | Age * pop | threshold (8 years) | Intercept | 2.43 ± 0.65 | 3.76 | *** | 0.01 | 0.44 | 4.03 ± 0.33 | 4.03 ± 0.25 | 4.26 ± 0.35 | 3.98 ± 0.36 |
| Age | 0.19 ± 0.07 | 2.85 | ** | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | 2.67 ± 0.88 | 3.04 | ** | |||||||||
| Age: Pop | −0.32 ± 0.10 | −3.01 | ** | |||||||||
| Hemolysis | Age * pop | threshold (10 years) | Intercept | −1.52 ± 1.31 | −1.17 | — | 0.01 | 0.62 | 2.24 ± 0.41 | 2.35 ± 0.37 | 2.10 ± 0.40 | 1.97 ± 0.38 |
| Age | 0.38 ± 0.12 | 3.07 | ** | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | 5.11 ± 2.06 | 2.48 | * | |||||||||
| Age: Pop | −0.53 ± 0.20 | −2.57 | * | |||||||||
| INFLAMMATORY TRAITS | ||||||||||||
| Alpha1-globulin | Age + I(age^2) + pop + sex | quadratic | Intercept | 3.35 ± 0.19 | 17.45 | *** | 0.04 | 0.5 | 3.35 ± 0.20 | 3.11 ± 0.19 | 3.24 ± 0.16 | 2.94 ± 0.15 |
| Age | −0.09 ± 0.03 | −2.54 | * | |||||||||
| I(age^2) | 0.01 ± 0.003 | 3.29 | ** | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | −0.13 ± 0.05 | −2.76 | ** | |||||||||
| Sex (M) | 0.18 ± 0.05 | 3.79 | *** | |||||||||
| Alpha2-globulin | Constant | — | Intercept | 5.79 ± 0.30 | 19.62 | − | 0.00 | 0.26 | 5.63 ± 0.30 | 5.84 ± 0.34 | 5.66 ± 0.33 | 5.88 ± 0.29 |
| Beta-globulin | I(age^2) + sex + pop | quadratic | Intercept | 5.84 ± 0.38 | 15.22 | *** | 0.12 | 0.43 | 6.20 ± 0.54 | 5.73 ± 0.36 | 7.12 ± 0.51 | 6.41 ± 0.41 |
| I(age^2) | 0.02 ± 0.002 | 8.71 | *** | |||||||||
| Sex (M) | 0.63 ± 0.16 | 3.81 | *** | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | 0.64 ± 0.16 | 3.87 | *** | |||||||||
| Haptoglobin | Age * pop + sex | threshold (9 years) | Intercept | −4.24 ± 0.74 | −5.71 | *** | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.34 ± 0.10 | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 0.69 ± 0.14 | 0.30 ± 0.11 |
| Age | 0.48 ± 0.08 | 6.04 | *** | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | 3.18 ± 1.20 | 2.66 | ** | |||||||||
| Sex (M) | 0.25 ± 0.08 | 3.05 | ** | |||||||||
| Age: Pop | −0.33 ± 0.13 | −2.50 | * | |||||||||
| ADAPTIVE TRAITS | ||||||||||||
| Lymphocyte count | Age + I(age^2) + pop | quadratic | Intercept | 2.81 ± 0.17 | 16.49 | *** | 0.14 | 0.37 | 2.25 ± 0.14 | 2.42 ± 0.13 | 1.90 ± 0.17 | 1.89 ± 0.15 |
| Age | −0.15 ± 0.05 | −2.76 | ** | |||||||||
| I(age^2) | 0.01 ± 0.004 | 2.12 | * | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | −0.65 ± 0.08 | −8.27 | *** | |||||||||
| Gamma-globulin | Age + pop | threshold (4 years) | Intercept | 12.32 ± 1.14 | 10.5 | *** | 0.21 | 0.65 | 13.86 ± 0.90 | 13.54 ± 0.93 | 18.55 ± 1.66 | 18.43 ± 1.57 |
| Age | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 6.79 | *** | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | 4.40 ± 0.39 | 11.43 | *** | |||||||||
The effect of different age functions (factor, linear, threshold, quadratic), of sex (F: Female, M: Male), of population (TF: Trois-Fontaines, CH: Chizé), with all two and three-way interactions between them, were tested. All models included individual identity, the year of capture and the cohort of individuals as random effects. When the age threshold model was selected, we have indicated the age at which the parameter begins to vary, and the “Parameter estimate” of the age function is the slope of the variation with age after the threshold age. Statistical significance is represented by *for p < 0.05, **for p < 0.01 and ***for p < 0.001. R2m and R2c are the marginal and conditional variance of the model, respectively. Values are presented ± Standard Error.
Figure 1Predicted age-related changes in immune parameters in two populations of roe deer (Trois-Fontaines and Chizé). Plots are based on predicted effects from the selected model for each parameter (see Table 1). The lines represent model predictions and the shaded areas the 95% CIs. The points correspond to the average value per age and the bars correspond to ± Standard Error. All individuals older than 12 years of age were pooled within a “12+” age class.
Linear mixed effect models selected for 4 parasite abundances.
| Parasitic trait | Best model selected | Age function | Variable | Parameter estimate ± SE | t-value | p | R2m | R2c | Predicted value at two years | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ♂TF | ♀TF | ♂CH | ♀CH | |||||||||
| Gastro-intestinal strongyles | (age + I(age^2)) * pop + sex | quadratic | Intercept | 45.63 ± 16.02 | 2.85 | ** | 0.06 | 0.77 | 34.99 ± 10.81 | 15.05 ± 4.93 | 34.48 ± 10.61 | 22.01 ± 16.35 |
| Age | −15.30 ± 5.16 | −2.97 | ** | |||||||||
| I(age^2) | 1.55 ± 0.42 | 3.72 | *** | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | −48.27 ± 21.40 | −2.26 | * | |||||||||
| Sex (M) | 19.86 ± 8.27 | 2.4 | * | |||||||||
| Age: Pop (CH) | 20.35 ± 7.76 | 2.62 | ** | |||||||||
| I(age^2): Pop (CH) | −1.42 ± 0.64 | −2.23 | * | |||||||||
|
| age * pop * sex | threshold (5 years) | Intercept | −20.85 ± 40.58 | −0.51 | — | 0.15 | 0.18 | 7.97 ± 4.75 | 7.35 ± 3.40 | 81.42 ± 32.81 | 86.40 ± 29.43 |
| Age | 4.19 ± 5.66 | 0.74 | — | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | −4.21 ± 55.94 | −0.08 | — | |||||||||
| Sex (M) | −35.95 ± 60.37 | −0.60 | — | |||||||||
| Age: Pop (CH) | 10.28 ± 8.02 | 1.28 | — | |||||||||
| Age: Sex (M) | 8.13 ± 9.20 | 0.88 | — | |||||||||
| Pop (CH): Sex (M) | −222.44 ± 99.69 | −2.23 | * | |||||||||
| Age: Pop (CH): Sex (M) | 49.66 ± 16.08 | 3.09 | ** | |||||||||
| Protostrongylids | age * pop * sex | threshold (9 years) | Intercept | −24.67 ± 4.09 | −6.04 | *** | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.41 ± 0.37 | 1.40 ± 0.74 | 0.38 ± 0.18 |
| Age | 2.76 ± 0.44 | 6.3 | *** | |||||||||
| Pop (CH) | 22.83 ± 6.14 | 3.72 | *** | |||||||||
| Sex (M) | 17.84 ± 8.22 | 2.17 | * | |||||||||
| Age: Pop (CH) | −2.52 ± 0.66 | −3.82 | *** | |||||||||
| Age: Sex (M) | −1.94 ± 0.90 | −2.17 | * | |||||||||
| Pop (CH): Sex (M) | −213.75 ± 38.07 | −5.61 | *** | |||||||||
| Age: Pop (CH): Sex (M) | 23.83 ± 4.22 | 5.65 | *** | |||||||||
| Coccidia | constant | — | Intercept | 2560.00 ± 2296 | 1.12 | — | 0.00 | 0.98 | 233.38 ± 194.70 | 244.10 ± 202.30 | 26.07 ± 13.75 | 27.48 ± 8.86 |
The effect of different age functions (factor, linear, threshold, quadratic), of sex (F: Female, M: Male), of population (TF: Trois-Fontaines, CH: Chizé), with all two and three-way interactions between them, were tested. All models included individual identity, the year of capture and the cohort of individuals as random effects. When the age threshold model was selected, we have indicated the age at which the parameter begins to vary, and the “Parameter estimate” of the age function is the slope of the variation with age after the threshold age. Statistical significance is represented by *for p < 0.05, **for p < 0.01 and ***for p < 0.001. R2m and R2c are the marginal and conditional variance of the model, respectively. Values are presented ± Standard Error.
Figure 2Predicted age-related changes in parasite abundance in two roe deer populations (Trois-Fontaines and Chizé). Plots are based on predicted effects from the selected model for each parameter (see Table 2). The lines represent model predictions and the shaded areas the 95% CIs. The points correspond to the average value per age and the bars correspond to ± Standard Error. All individuals older than 12 years of age were pooled in a “12+” age class.