Literature DB >> 26497812

Does sexual selection shape sex differences in longevity and senescence patterns across vertebrates? A review and new insights from captive ruminants.

Morgane Tidière1, Jean-Michel Gaillard2, Dennis W H Müller3, Laurie Bingaman Lackey4, Olivier Gimenez5, Marcus Clauss6, Jean-François Lemaître2.   

Abstract

In most mammals, both sexes display different survival patterns, often involving faster senescence in males. Being under intense sexual competition to secure mating opportunities, males of polygynous species allocate resources to costly behaviors and conspicuous sexual traits, which might explain these observed differences in longevity and senescence patterns. However, comparative studies performed to date have led to conflicting results. We aimed to resolve this problem by first reviewing case studies of the relationship between the strength of sexual selection and age-specific survival metrics. Then, we performed a comprehensive comparative analysis to test whether such relationships exist among species of captive ruminants. We found that the strength of sexual selection negatively influenced the onset of actuarial senescence in males, with males senescing earlier in polygynous than in monogamous species, which led to reduced male longevity in polygynous species. Moreover, males of territorial species senesced earlier but slower, and have a shorter longevity than males of species displaying other mating tactics. We detected little influence of the strength of sexual selection on the rate of actuarial senescence. Our findings demonstrate that the onset of actuarial senescence, rather than its rate, is a side effect of physiological mechanisms linked to sexual selection, and potentially accounts for observed differences in longevity.
© 2015 The Author(s). Evolution © 2015 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing; intrinsic physiological costs; mating system; ungulates

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26497812     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  17 in total

Review 1.  Reproductive costs in terrestrial male vertebrates: insights from bird studies.

Authors:  Josefa Bleu; Marlène Gamelon; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sex chromosomes, sex ratios and sex gaps in longevity in plants.

Authors:  Gabriel A B Marais; J-F Lemaître
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Thermal conditions predict intraspecific variation in senescence rate in frogs and toads.

Authors:  Hugo Cayuela; Jean-François Lemaître; Erin Muths; Rebecca M McCaffery; Thierry Frétey; Bernard Le Garff; Benedikt R Schmidt; Kurt Grossenbacher; Omar Lenzi; Blake R Hossack; Lisa A Eby; Brad A Lambert; Johan Elmberg; Juha Merilä; Jérôme M W Gippet; Jean-Michel Gaillard; David S Pilliod
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Sex differences in adult lifespan and aging rates of mortality across wild mammals.

Authors:  Jean-François Lemaître; Victor Ronget; Morgane Tidière; Dominique Allainé; Vérane Berger; Aurélie Cohas; Fernando Colchero; Dalia A Conde; Michael Garratt; András Liker; Gabriel A B Marais; Alexander Scheuerlein; Tamás Székely; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Men Sustain Higher Dysregulation Levels Than Women Without Becoming Frail.

Authors:  Alan A Cohen; Véronique Legault; Qing Li; Linda P Fried; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  The evolution of monogamy is associated with reversals from male to female bias in the survival cost of parasitism.

Authors:  Tyler N Wittman; Robert M Cox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Comparative analyses of longevity and senescence reveal variable survival benefits of living in zoos across mammals.

Authors:  Morgane Tidière; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Vérane Berger; Dennis W H Müller; Laurie Bingaman Lackey; Olivier Gimenez; Marcus Clauss; Jean-François Lemaître
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evidence for senescence in survival but not in reproduction in a short-lived passerine.

Authors:  Rémi Fay; Michael Schaub; Jennifer A Border; Ian G Henderson; Georg Fahl; Jürgen Feulner; Petra Horch; Mathis Müller; Helmut Rebstock; Dmitry Shitikov; Davorin Tome; Matthias Vögeli; Martin U Grüebler
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Challenges and opportunities for comparative studies of survival rates: An example with male pinnipeds.

Authors:  Jamie L Brusa; Jay J Rotella; Katharine M Banner; Patrick R Hutchins
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Immunosenescence patterns differ between populations but not between sexes in a long-lived mammal.

Authors:  L Cheynel; J-F Lemaître; J-M Gaillard; B Rey; G Bourgoin; H Ferté; M Jégo; F Débias; M Pellerin; L Jacob; E Gilot-Fromont
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.