Literature DB >> 23733656

Evolution of sex differences in lifespan and aging: causes and constraints.

Alexei A Maklakov1, Virpi Lummaa.   

Abstract

Why do the two sexes have different lifespans and rates of aging? Two hypotheses based on asymmetric inheritance of sex chromosomes ("unguarded X") or mitochondrial genomes ("mother's curse") explain sex differences in lifespan as sex-specific maladaptation leading to increased mortality in the shorter-lived sex. While asymmetric inheritance hypotheses equate long life with high fitness, considerable empirical evidence suggests that sexes resolve the fundamental tradeoff between reproduction and survival differently resulting in sex-specific optima for lifespan. However, selection for sex-specific values in life-history traits is constrained by intersexual genetic correlations resulting in intra-locus sexual conflict over optimal lifespan. The available data suggest that the evolution of sexual dimorphism only partially resolves these conflicts. Sexual conflict over optimal trait values, which has been demonstrated in model organisms and in humans, is likely to play a key role in shaping the evolution of lifespan, as well as in maintaining genetic variation for sex-specific diseases.
© 2013 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; disease; mitochondria; senescence; sex chromosomes; sexual conflict; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23733656     DOI: 10.1002/bies.201300021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  72 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in the gut microbiome-brain axis across the lifespan.

Authors:  Eldin Jašarević; Kathleen E Morrison; Tracy L Bale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Mitochondrial maintenance failure in aging and role of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  John Tower
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.013

4.  Sisters' curse: sexually antagonistic effects constrain the spread of a mitochondrial haplogroup superior in sperm competition.

Authors:  Michael V Padua; David W Zeh; Melvin M Bonilla; Jeanne A Zeh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Early-late life trade-offs and the evolution of ageing in the wild.

Authors:  Jean-François Lemaître; Vérane Berger; Christophe Bonenfant; Mathieu Douhard; Marlène Gamelon; Floriane Plard; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Sexual conflict, life span, and aging.

Authors:  Margo I Adler; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  The costs of being male: are there sex-specific effects of uniparental mitochondrial inheritance?

Authors:  Madeleine Beekman; Damian K Dowling; Duur K Aanen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Sex-specific stress tolerance, proteolysis, and lifespan in the invertebrate Tigriopus californicus.

Authors:  Helen B Foley; Patrick Y Sun; Rocio Ramirez; Brandon K So; Yaamini R Venkataraman; Emily N Nixon; Kelvin J A Davies; Suzanne Edmands
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.032

9.  Culled males, infant mortality and reproductive success in a pre-industrial Finnish population.

Authors:  Tim A Bruckner; Samuli Helle; Elisabeth Bolund; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Sexual Dimorphism of Resting-State Network Connectivity in Healthy Ageing.

Authors:  Sharna D Jamadar; Francesco Sforazzini; Parnesh Raniga; Nicholas J Ferris; Bryan Paton; Michael J Bailey; Amy Brodtmann; Paul A Yates; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephanie A Ward; Robyn L Woods; Elsdon Storey; John J McNeil; Gary F Egan
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.