Literature DB >> 29057753

Validation of proton stopping power ratio estimation based on dual energy CT using fresh tissue samples.

Vicki T Taasti1, Gregory J Michalak, David C Hansen, Amanda J Deisher, Jon J Kruse, Bernhard Krauss, Ludvig P Muren, Jørgen B B Petersen, Cynthia H McCollough.   

Abstract

Dual energy CT (DECT) has been shown, in theoretical and phantom studies, to improve the stopping power ratio (SPR) determination used for proton treatment planning compared to the use of single energy CT (SECT). However, it has not been shown that this also extends to organic tissues. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate the accuracy of SPR estimation for fresh pork and beef tissue samples used as surrogates of human tissues. The reference SPRs for fourteen tissue samples, which included fat, muscle and femur bone, were measured using proton pencil beams. The tissue samples were subsequently CT scanned using four different scanners with different dual energy acquisition modes, giving in total six DECT-based SPR estimations for each sample. The SPR was estimated using a proprietary algorithm (syngo.via DE Rho/Z Maps, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) for extracting the electron density and the effective atomic number. SECT images were also acquired and SECT-based SPR estimations were performed using a clinical Hounsfield look-up table. The mean and standard deviation of the SPR over large volume-of-interests were calculated. For the six different DECT acquisition methods, the root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) for the SPR estimates over all tissue samples were between 0.9% and 1.5%. For the SECT-based SPR estimation the RMSE was 2.8%. For one DECT acquisition method, a positive bias was seen in the SPR estimates, having a mean error of 1.3%. The largest errors were found in the very dense cortical bone from a beef femur. This study confirms the advantages of DECT-based SPR estimation although good results were also obtained using SECT for most tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29057753     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa952f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  17 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of the impact of imaging noise on dual-energy CT-based proton stopping power ratio estimation.

Authors:  Hugh H C Lee; Bin Li; Xinhui Duan; Linghong Zhou; Xun Jia; Ming Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Theoretical and experimental analysis of photon counting detector CT for proton stopping power prediction.

Authors:  Vicki T Taasti; David C Hansen; Gregory J Michalak; Amanda J Deisher; Jon J Kruse; Ludvig P Muren; Jørgen B B Petersen; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Status and innovations in pre-treatment CT imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Wohlfahrt; Christian Richter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Determination of proton stopping power ratio with dual-energy CT in 3D-printed tissue/air cavity surrogates.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Matthew M Mille; Sina Mossahebi; Haijian Chen; Paul Maggi; Huaiyu Chen-Mayer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Learning-based synthetic dual energy CT imaging from single energy CT for stopping power ratio calculation in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  Serdar Charyyev; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Beth Ghavidel; Jonathan J Beitler; Mark McDonald; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Jun Zhou; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities.

Authors:  L Volz; C-A Collins-Fekete; E Bär; S Brons; C Graeff; R P Johnson; A Runz; C Sarosiek; R W Schulte; J Seco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Helium CT: Monte Carlo simulation results for an ideal source and detector with comparison to proton CT.

Authors:  Pierluigi Piersimoni; Bruce A Faddegon; José Ramos Méndez; Reinhard W Schulte; Lennart Volz; Joao Seco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The impact of secondary fragments on the image quality of helium ion imaging.

Authors:  Lennart Volz; Pierluigi Piersimoni; Vladimir A Bashkirov; Stephan Brons; Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete; Robert P Johnson; Reinhard W Schulte; Joao Seco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Feasibility of using post-contrast dual-energy CT for pediatric radiation treatment planning and dose calculation.

Authors:  Ozgur Ates; Chia-Ho Hua; Li Zhao; Nadav Shapira; Yoad Yagil; Thomas E Merchant; Matthew Krasin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Physics of Particle Beam and Hypofractionated Beam Delivery in NSCLC.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Clemens Grassberger; Gregory C Sharp
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 5.421

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.