Literature DB >> 34706355

The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities.

L Volz1,2, C-A Collins-Fekete3, E Bär3,4, S Brons5, C Graeff6, R P Johnson7, A Runz8, C Sarosiek9, R W Schulte10, J Seco1,2.   

Abstract

This work provides a quantitative assessment of helium ion CT (HeCT) for particle therapy treatment planning. For the first time, HeCT based range prediction accuracy in a heterogeneous tissue phantom is presented and compared to single-energy x-ray CT (SECT), dual-energy x-ray CT (DECT) and proton CT (pCT). HeCT and pCT scans were acquired using the US pCT collaboration prototype particle CT scanner at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. SECT and DECT scans were done with a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash and converted to RSP. A Catphan CTP404 module was used to study the RSP accuracy of HeCT. A custom phantom of 20 cm diameter containing several tissue equivalent plastic cubes was used to assess the spatial resolution of HeCT and compare it to DECT. A clinically realistic heterogeneous tissue phantom was constructed using cranial slices from a pig head placed inside a cylindrical phantom (ø150 mm). A proton beam (84.67 mm range) depth-dose measurement was acquired using a stack of GafchromicTM EBT-XD films in a central dosimetry insert in the phantom. CT scans of the phantom were acquired with each modality, and proton depth-dose estimates were simulated based on the reconstructions. The RSP accuracy of HeCT for the plastic phantom was found to be 0.3 ± 0.1%. The spatial resolution for HeCT of the cube phantom was 5.9 ± 0.4 lp cm-1for central, and 7.6 ± 0.8 lp cm-1for peripheral cubes, comparable to DECT spatial resolution (7.7 ± 0.3 lp cm-1and 7.4 ± 0.2 lp cm-1, respectively). For the pig head, HeCT, SECT, DECT and pCT predicted range accuracy was 0.25%, -1.40%, -0.45% and 0.39%, respectively. In this study, HeCT acquired with a prototype system showed potential for particle therapy treatment planning, offering RSP accuracy, spatial resolution, and range prediction accuracy comparable to that achieved with a commercial DECT scanner. Still, technical improvements of HeCT are needed to enable clinical implementation.
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dual-energy CT; helium ions; particle CT; particle therapy; proton ct; range accuracy; tissue

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34706355      PMCID: PMC8792995          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac33ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  55 in total

1.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  The Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center.

Authors:  T h Haberer; J Debus; H Eickhoff; O Jäkel; D Schulz-Ertner; U Weber
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Dosimetric accuracy and radiobiological implications of ion computed tomography for proton therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Sebastian Meyer; Florian Kamp; Thomas Tessonnier; Andrea Mairani; Claus Belka; David J Carlson; Chiara Gianoli; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Pre-treatment patient-specific stopping power by combining list-mode proton radiography and x-ray CT.

Authors:  Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete; Sébastien Brousmiche; David C Hansen; Luc Beaulieu; Joao Seco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Experimental validation of two dual-energy CT methods for proton therapy using heterogeneous tissue samples.

Authors:  Esther Bär; Arthur Lalonde; Rongxiao Zhang; Kyung-Wook Jee; Kai Yang; Gregory Sharp; Bob Liu; Gary Royle; Hugo Bouchard; Hsiao-Ming Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A technique for spatial resolution improvement in helium-beam radiography.

Authors:  C Amato; M Martisikova; T Gehrke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration.

Authors:  Ming Yang; X Ronald Zhu; Peter C Park; Uwe Titt; Radhe Mohan; Gary Virshup; James E Clayton; Lei Dong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Experimental comparison of photon versus particle computed tomography to predict tissue relative stopping powers.

Authors:  Esther Bär; Lennart Volz; Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete; Stephan Brons; Armin Runz; Reinhard Wilhelm Schulte; Joao Seco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Helium CT: Monte Carlo simulation results for an ideal source and detector with comparison to proton CT.

Authors:  Pierluigi Piersimoni; Bruce A Faddegon; José Ramos Méndez; Reinhard W Schulte; Lennart Volz; Joao Seco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Software platform for simulation of a prototype proton CT scanner.

Authors:  Valentina Giacometti; Vladimir A Bashkirov; Pierluigi Piersimoni; Susanna Guatelli; Tia E Plautz; Hartmut F-W Sadrozinski; Robert P Johnson; Andriy Zatserklyaniy; Thomas Tessonnier; Katia Parodi; Anatoly B Rosenfeld; Reinhard W Schulte
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.506

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for Upright Particle Therapy Patient Positioning and Associated Image Guidance.

Authors:  Lennart Volz; Yinxiangzi Sheng; Marco Durante; Christian Graeff
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.