| Literature DB >> 29047329 |
Xianfeng Guo1, Shenghui Li2, Jiachun Zhang1, Feifan Wu1, Xiangchun Li2, Dan Wu1, Min Zhang1, Zihao Ou1, Zhuye Jie2, Qiulong Yan3, Peng Li2, Jiangfeng Yi4, Yongzheng Peng5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Akkermansia muciniphila is one of the most dominant bacteria that resides on the mucus layer of intestinal tract and plays key role in human health, however, little is known about its genomic content.Entities:
Keywords: Akkermansia muciniphila; Antibiotic resistance; Genome diversity; Mammalian gut microbiota; Population structure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29047329 PMCID: PMC5648452 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-4195-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Pangenome, core-genome and gene occurrence of the 40 analyzed A. muciniphila isolates. (a) Pangenome accumulation curves. The blue boxes denote the number of unique genes discovered with the sequential addition of new genomes. The equations below the graph show parameters for fits to Heap’s law, and the positive exponent indicates an open state of the pangenome. (b) Gene occurrence plot shows the core-genome and additional accessory genes of A. muciniphila
Fig. 2Phylogroups of A. muciniphila. (a) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on core genome SNPs of 40 A. muciniphila isolates. The tree is inferred using RAxML with 1000 replications, with Rubritalea marina DSM 17716 as outgroup species. Bootstrap support values are shown for the separation nodes of the main phylogroups. (b) Hierarchical clustering of isolates based on whole-genome level average nucleotide identity (ANI). Pairwise ANI between isolates is shown as a heat map
Fig. 3Functional difference between A. muciniphila phylogroups. (a) Principal components analysis based on the KEGG profile. Isolates on the first and second principal components (PC1 and PC2) are plotted by nodes. Lines connect isolates in the same groups, and colored circles cover the isolates near the center of gravity for each group. (b) The significantly different pathways between AmI and AmII/III. Pathways with false discovery rate (FDR) corrected P value (q) of <0.05 (converted to Z-score; two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) are shown
Fig. 4Phylogroups of A. muciniphila strains derived from human and other mammalian gut microbiotas. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on core-genome SNPs of 40 A. muciniphila isolates and 106 new constructed genomes (MAGs). The tree is inferred using RAxML with 1000 replications
Fig. 5Distribution of A. muciniphila phylogroups in mammalian gut microbiomes. (a) Occurrence rate in the Chinese, European and American population and other mammalian gut microbiotas. (b) Relative abundance of A. muciniphila phylogroups in selected samples
Fig. 6Acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes during A. muciniphila evolution. (a) A. muciniphila GP36 gained 8 genes from the plasmid pRSF1010. Genomic fragments painted with red denote their highly homologous regions (nucleotide similarity >99%). Genes are denoted by arrows, and the three antibiotic resistance genes are labeled. (b) Drug sensitive results of A. muciniphila GP36 and ATCC BAA-835. Definition of abbreviations: AM, amikacin; SUL, sulfonamides; TEC, teicoplanin; PB, polymyxin; SCF, cefoperazone-sulbactam; MEM, meropenem; MH, minocycline