Literature DB >> 29045338

A clinical evaluation of the impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on PET FDG metrics.

Delphine Vallot1, Olivier Caselles, Leonor Chaltiel, Anthony Fernandez, Erwan Gabiache, Lawrence Dierickx, Slimane Zerdoud, Mathilde Bauriaud, Frédéric Courbon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of using the Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) algorithm on a bismuth germanium oxide positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) system for F-FDG PET/CT exams in case of low injected activity and scan duration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: F-FDG respiratory gated PET/CT performed on 102 cancer patients, injected with ∼2 MBq/kg of F-FDG, were reconstructed using two algorithms: ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and BPL. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated as the ratio of mean standard uptake value (SUV) over the standard deviation in a reference volume defined automatically in the liver. The peak SUV and volumes were also measured in lesions larger than 2 cm thanks to the automated segmentation method.
RESULTS: On 85 respiratory gated patients, the median SNR was significantly higher with BPL (P<0.0001) and it is even better when the BMI of the patient increases (odds ratio=1.26).For the 55 lesions, BPL significantly increased the SUVpeak [difference: (-0.5; 1.4), median=0.4, P<0.0001] compared with OSEM in 83.6% of the cases. With BPL, the volume was lower in 61.8% of the cases compared with OSEM, but this was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The BPL algorithm improves the image quality and lesion contrast and appears to be particularly appropriate for patients with a high BMI as it improves the SNR. However, it will be important for patient follow-up or multicenter studies to use the same algorithm and preferably BPL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29045338     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  11 in total

1.  Standard OSEM vs. regularized PET image reconstruction: qualitative and quantitative comparison using phantom data and various clinical radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Judit Lantos; Erik S Mittra; Craig S Levin; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 2.  Respiratory-gated PET/CT for pulmonary lesion characterisation-promises and problems.

Authors:  Russell Frood; Garry McDermott; Andrew Scarsbrook
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  How Do the More Recent Reconstruction Algorithms Affect the Interpretation Criteria of PET/CT Images?

Authors:  Antonella Matti; Giacomo Maria Lima; Cinzia Pettinato; Francesca Pietrobon; Felice Martinelli; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-01

4.  The clinical effectiveness of reconstructing 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT bone using Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm for evaluation of metastatic bone disease in obese patients.

Authors:  Sharjeel Usmani; Najeeb Ahmed; Gopinath Gnanasegaran; Rashid Rasheed; Fahad Marafi; Mashari Alnaaimi; Mohammad Omar; Ahmed Musbah; Fareeda Al Kandari; Stijn De Schepper; Tim Van den Wyngaert
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Prostate cancer laparoscopic port site metastasis: A case report.

Authors:  Michael C Jundt; Stephen M Broski
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Usefulness of respiratory-gated PET acquisition during delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning for patients with liver metastases.

Authors:  Shota Watanabe; Kohei Hanaoka; Hayato Kaida; Tomoko Hyodo; Minoru Yamada; Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Kazunari Ishii
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2021

7.  New PET technologies - embracing progress and pushing the limits.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Charline Lasnon; Adam Kesner; Craig S Levin; Irene Buvat; Andrei Iagaru; Ken Hermann; Ramsey D Badawi; Simon R Cherry; Kevin M Bradley; Daniel R McGowan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Impact of the Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear®) in comparison with the OSEM reconstruction on low contrast PET hypoxic images.

Authors:  Edgar Texte; Pierrick Gouel; Sébastien Thureau; Justine Lequesne; Bertrand Barres; Agathe Edet-Sanson; Pierre Decazes; Pierre Vera; Sébastien Hapdey
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-05-12

9.  Evaluation of PET quantitation accuracy among multiple discovery IQ PET/CT systems via NEMA image quality test.

Authors:  Delphine Vallot; Elena De Ponti; Sabrina Morzenti; Anna Gramek; Anna Pieczonka; Gabriel Reynés Llompart; Jakub Siennicki; Paul Deak; Chiranjib Dutta; Jorge Uribe; Olivier Caselles
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-05-12

10.  Evaluation of block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction of 68Ga-DOTATOC, 18F-fluoride, and 11C-acetate whole-body examinations acquired on a digital time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  Elin Lindström; Lars Lindsjö; Anders Sundin; Jens Sörensen; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.